
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 2015, Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages: 113-117
115
Fig. 5: Anchor bolt components
6-C Bond strength
The transferred force between anchor and soil depends
on various factors including method and pressure of
concrete injection, excavating type, excavated hole’s
diameter, bond length and soil type which is called bond
strength. This strength is defined based on laboratory
results [3].
6-D Anchor diameter calculation
To design anchors, the steel bars, type A3 with
characteristic strength of Fy=4000 kg/cm
2
are used. Based
on Iran concrete regulations, for designing tensile bars,
reduction coefficient of steel strength is considered equal to
0/85. Hence the required diameter is calculated for anchor.
6-E lagging designing
The designing of laggings thickness in soldier pile
system is performed based on empirical relations. The
suggested amounts of wooden timber thickness (lagging)
are offered depending on the type of soil, excavation depth
and the distance between soldier piles [3].
6-F The computation of axial capacity required for
a soldier pile
The axial capacity required to a soldier pile is
computed using relation 5. In this relation, the first term is
relevant to pile friction strength with confidence coefficient
of 2 and the second term is the strength of pile’s tip with
the confidence coefficient of 2/5 [3].
Q
a
is pile axial capacity, f
s
wall strength, A
s
pile wall
area, q
t
tip strength and A
t
the area of pile tip.
6-G Computation of total axial load
Total axial load is the result of summing vertical forces
of anchors and the weight of soldier pile, concrete and
wooden timbers, which is compared to pile axial capacity
[3].
7 Parametric Studies
Some of the parameters that influence the behavior of
this system are soil type, excavation depth and the amount
of live load. In this paper, a wide parametric study has been
performed to determine the effect of these parameters. To
include different soils the range of C values of soil
cohesion is considered from 0 to 100 kN/m
2
(0,20,40,60,80,100) and φ the internal friction angle of soil
from 0 to 40 degrees (0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40) and ϒ soil
bulk density with the amounts of 17, 18, 19 and 20 KN/M
3
.
Also, modeling for excavation depths are 3, 6, 9 and 12
meters. Also to apply excavation surrounding live load, the
neighbor building loads is considered from 0 to 10 floors
for each floor the love load is 10 kN/m
2
.
Excavation conditions with respect to soil type, excavation
depth and different live loads are modeled in SupportIT
software. In this software, available flexural moment in pile
is picked and the section correspond to that moment is
designed. If the existing flexural moment in piles lead to
designing non-economical section, using steel anchors
(anchor bolts) in different heights of excavation, the
moment is diminished and the proper section is designed.
Anchor bolts in different situations are modeled in software
and the existing force is taken from them, then their
diameter and length is designed. Wooden timbers
(Lagging) which locate between profiles to protect soil are
also modeled in this model and then the required designing
is performed.
According the multiplicity of modeling, the results are
presented as executive charts in terms of C (soil cohesion),
φ (the internal friction angle of soil), depths, different live
loads and also soil different bulk densities and then these
charts are classified in valuation types [1].
8 Study of Different Parameter Effect in
Designing Soldier Pile System
8-A Effect of excavation side live load (ω) on the amount
of moments in soldier pile
To show the effect of live load changes on the amount
of moments in the different intervals C, φ, a model with
fixed characteristics has been taken into account. And the
anchors situation and ω are considered as variable. With
investigating results, it can be said that live load changes
with other conditions being constant in poor soils (with low
C and φ) are very impressive on united moments. But the
live load changes in high shear strength soils (with high C
and φ) are not impressive on created moments. Figure (6)
[1].
Fig. 6: Chart of live load effect on the amount of moments
8-B Investigation of soil bulk density (ϒ) effect on
flexural moment
To show the effect of soil bulk density on flexural
moment, a model with constant live load and variable