Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques Download of PDF version |
2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages: |
J. Environ. Treat. Tech.
ISSN:
Journal weblink: http://www.jett.dormaj.com
Adsorptive Performance of Iminodiacetic Acid
Functionalized Nanoporous Carbon for Removal of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) Ions in Aqueous System
Mansoor Anbia*, Roghaye Dehghan
Research Laboratory of Nanoporous Materials, Faculty of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology,
Tehran
Received: 25/05/2018 |
Accepted: 26/06/2018 |
Published: 30/09/2018 |
Abstract
In recent years, the exploration of nontoxic and inexpensive methods for the removal of heavy metals from wastewaters has been needed with respect to the impact of these toxic metal ions in the environment. Efficient and common adsorption techniques have been widely used for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater duo to the economically feasible properties. In this study, Nanoporous carbon
Keywords:
1 Introduction1
Nowadays, heavy metal ions have aroused worldwide attention. Heavy metal ions such as Pb (II), Cu (II) and Cd
(II)and their compounds are major pollutants in the coastal environment. These metal ions are high toxic and cannot be biodegradable in nature, which would cause damage to human and environment. [1]. There are many methods for removal of heavy metal ions pollution. From the methods used to remove heavy metal ions such as chemical precipitation, ion exchange, membrane and electrochemical technologies, adsorption method shows to be the most effective than the others[2, 3]. Existence of an adsorbent for adsorption method is necessary. Solid adsorbents bind with molecules by physical attractive forces, ion exchange, and chemical binding[4]. Different type of adsorbents have been studied for removal of heavy metal
Corresponding author: Mansoor Anbia, Research Laboratory of Nanoporous Materials, Faculty of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16846- 13114, Iran.
such as
The objective of this work was to preparation of CMK- 3 ordered mesoporous carbons modified with Imino diacetic Acid (IDA) and its application of as an adsorbent for removal of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) metal ions from aqueous solution. Batch experiments were performed to measure metal ion adsorption capacities. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy
2. Material and Methods
2.1Materials
Reagents used in this study were Tetraethylorthosilicate
(TEOS, 98%), PluronicP123, HCl (32%), Sucrose,
26
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques |
2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages: |
Ammonium persulfate (NH4)2S2O8 and H2SO4 (98%), Diethyl Iminodiacetate, Pb(NO3)2, Cu(NO3)2 and Cd(NO3)2. All chemicals were of analytical grade and were prepared from E. Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) except PluronicP123.
2.2praparation of Adsorbent
In the our previous study,
modified with with
2.3 Characterization
qe = |
(co |
v |
(1) |
|
|||
|
m |
|
|
where Ce (mg/L) is equilibrium concentrations of metal ions, V is the volume in L of metal ions solution, m is the weight in g of the adsorbent and C0 is the initial concentrations of metal ions. The Langmuir and Freundlich models, which correspond to homogeneous and heterogeneous adsorbent surfaces, are used to describe the equilibrium isotherm data. The Langmuir model is given by Eq. (2):
qe = |
qm ×b ×ce |
(2) |
|
1+ b ×ce |
|||
|
|
where qm (mg/g) and b (L/mg) are maximum adsorption capacity of adsorbent and the Langmuir constant related to the adsorption energy coefficient, respectively.
The Freundlich model is given by Eq. (3):
1 |
|
qe = kf × ce n |
(3) |
where kf (mg/g) and n (L/mg) are the Freundlich constants
related to adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively[22, 23].
3. Results and Discussion
3.1Characterization
The XRD patterns of ordered structure of
after the modification with (NH4)2S2O8 and functionalization with IDA.
Figure 1: a) XRD patterns of
27
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques |
2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages: |
The intensities of the XRD peaks for
The surface morphology of the obtained
Figure. 3 shows the
a |
|
b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. SEM photographs of a)
Figure 3. IR spectra of
3.2Effect of pH
To assess the pH dependence of the adsorption,
solutions in the range of pH
seen, adsorption efficiency increases with increasing the pH from 2 to 4, and then decreases at the pH value higher than
4.The increase in the metal removal as the pH increases (2<pH<4) could be due to the decrease in competition between proton and metal species for the surface sites and decrease in positive surface charge, which results in a lower
28
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques |
2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages: |
columbic repulsion of the adsorbing metal. The maximum adsorption was observed at pH 4 for all ions. However, Low adsorption of the analytes at high pH (>4.0), is because of the competition between the formation of hydroxylated complexes of the metal ions on the active sites of the
3.3Effect of concentration of eluent on desorption
The selection of suitable eluent is important for
desorption of the heavy metal ions. Eluent selected should be capable of extracting the analyte and should not affect the adsorbent. As shown in Figure. 4; adsorption of heavy metal ions was decreased at low pH. Therefore, the acidic eluent is the best solution for desorption of the analytes. In this regard HNO3 with different concentration in the range of
3.4Regeneration of adsorbent
One of the most important characterizations of the
adsorption systems is the multiple reuse of the adsorbent, which significantly decreases the process cost. Regeneration of the
the adsorbent is stable in operation process, enabling more than 10
3.5Isotherm study in Batch study
The experimental data on the effect of an initial
concentration of Pb (II), Cu (II) and Cd (II) ions on the
Figure 4. Effect of pH adsorption of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) over
adsorbent was 1 g/L].
Figure. 5. Effect of eluent concentration on desorption of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II). [initial concentration = 100mg/L, solution pH
was 4, dose of adsorbent was 1 g/L].
29
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques |
2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages: |
Figure 7. Adsorption isotherm of ▲) Pb(II), ■) Cu(II) and ●) Cd(II) on
ambient temperature.
Table 1: Langmuir and Freundlich parameters for adsorption of Pb(II), Cu(II) and CdII) on
|
|
Langmuir |
|
Freundlich |
|
|
Metals |
q max(mg/g) |
b(L/mg) |
R2 |
KF(mg/m) |
n (L/mg) |
R2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pb(II) |
160.55 |
0.31 |
0.9967 |
62.66 |
5.06 |
0.9226 |
Cu(II) |
147.20 |
0.21 |
0.9920 |
47.56 |
4.28 |
0.9339 |
Cd(II |
142.38 |
0.18 |
0.9934 |
43.05 |
4.11 |
0.9336 |
30
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages:
Table 2: Comparative data of the adsorption capacity of
|
|
|
|
|
Adsorbent |
|
Metal |
Adsorption capacity(mg/g) |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Adsorbent |
|
Modifying agent |
|
|
conc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference |
|||
|
|
|
dose (g/L) |
|
Pb(II) |
|
Cu(II) |
|
Cd(II) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(mg/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
AEAPTMS |
1.1 |
113 |
|
- |
9.4 |
- |
[25] |
|
||||||
|
|
DETA |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
[26] |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
1 |
318 |
|
57.2 |
57.2 |
- |
[27] |
|
|||||||
|
|
MPTS |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
5 |
127 |
|
36.4 |
36.4 |
- |
[28] |
|
|||||||
|
|
APTS |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
5 |
50 |
|
- |
- |
18.2 |
[29] |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
1 |
100 |
|
94.8 |
90.3 |
71.1 |
[30] |
|
|||||||
|
|
dendrimer |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
SNHS |
|
3 |
100 |
|
26.86 |
- |
20.82 |
[31] |
|
||||||
|
|
Non |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
3 |
100 |
|
31.89 |
- |
31.89 |
[31] |
|
|||||||
|
|
APTS |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
3 |
100 |
|
40.73 |
- |
40.73 |
[31] |
|
|||||||
|
|
APTS |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
1.5 |
300 |
|
147.4 |
145.1 |
142.3 |
|
This study |
|||||||
|
|
IDA |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AEAPTMS:
Mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane; APTS:
4 Conclusions
In this study, the
145.1and 142.3 mg/g for Pb(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II), respectively.
Aknowledgment
The authors are highly thankful to Iran National Science Foundation for the financial support to this project.
References
1.Zhao, G., Wu, X., Tan, X. and Wang, X. (2010). Sorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions: a review. Open Colloid Sci J., 4(1).
2.Kacar, A. and Kocyigit, A. (2013). Characterization of heavy metal and antibiotic resistant bacteria isolated from Aliaga Ship Dismantling Zone, Eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Int. J. Environ. Res., 7(4);
3.Fu, F. and Wang, Q. (2011). Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J environ manage., 92(3); 407- 418.
4.Hashem, M. A. (2007). Adsorption of lead ions from aqueous solution by okra wastes. IJPS., 2(7);
5.Duru, İ., Ege, D. and Kamali, A. R. (2016). Graphene oxides for removal of heavy and precious metals from wastewater. J Mater Sci., 51(13);
6.Hayati, B., Maleki, A., Najafi, F., Daraei, H., Gharibi, F. and McKay, G. (2016). Synthesis and characterization of
PAMAM/CNT nanocomposite as a
7.Zhu, R., Chen, Q., Zhou, Q., Xi, Y., Zhu, J. and He, H. (2016). Adsorbents based on montmorillonite for contaminant removal from water: A review. [Review]. Appl Clay Sci., 123;
DETA: Trimethoxysilyl propyl diethylenetriamine; MPTS: 3-
8.Ihsanullah, Abbas, A.,
M.J., Nasser, M. S., Khraisheh, M. and Atieh, M. A. (2016). Heavy metal removal from aqueous solution by advanced carbon nanotubes: Critical review of adsorption applications. Sep Purif Technol., 157;
9.Ekramul Mahmud, H. N. M., Obidul Huq, A. K. and Yahya,
R.B. (2016). The removal of heavy metal ions from
wastewater/aqueous solution using
10.Silva, M. F., Pineda, E. A. G. and Bergamasco, R. (2015). Application of nanostructured iron oxides as adsorbents and photocatalysts for wastewater pollutant removal. QuimNova., 38(3);
11.Samiey, B., Cheng, C. H. and Wu, J. (2014). Organic- inorganic hybrid polymers as adsorbents for removal of heavy metal ions from solutions: A review. [Review]. Materials., 7(2),
12.Lim, A. P. and Aris, A. Z. (2014). A review on economically adsorbents on heavy metals removal in water and wastewater. [Review]. Rev Environ Sci Bio., 13(2);
13.Dave, P. N. and Chopda, L. V. (2014). Application of iron oxide nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals. Journal Nanotechnol., 2014.
14.Aditya, D., Rohan, P. and Gupta, S. (2011).
15.Goswami, C. and Majumder, A. (2015). Potential of Lemna minor in Ni and Cr removal from aqueous solution. Pollution., 1(4);
16.Malik, R., Lata, S. and Singhal, S. (2015). Evaluation of kinetics and adsorption isotherms for the Elimination of Pb (II) from aqueous solutions using Aloe barbadensis Miller Leaf Powder. Pollution., 1(4);
17.Vallés, V., Ledesma, B., Juárez, J., Gómez Costa, M., Anunziata, O. and Beltramone, A. (2017).
18.Husnain, S. M., Um, W., Chang, Y. Y. and Chang, Y. S. (2017). Recyclable superparamagnetic adsorbent based on mesoporous carbon for sequestration of radioactive Cesium. Chem Eng J., 308;
19.Zhang, C., Zhao, N., Chen, Y., Zhang, D., Yan, J., Zou, W., Zhang, K. and Huang, X. (2016). The signaling pathway of Caenorhabditis elegans mediates chemotaxis response to the
31
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques |
2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages: |
attractant
20.Barczak, M.,
Rotko, K., Dobrowolski, R. and Dąbrowski, A. (2015).
Ordered mesoporous carbons as effective sorbents for removal of heavy metal ions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 211;
21.Anbia, M. and Dehghan, R. (2014). Functionalized
mesoporous carbon with
22.Khazaeli, S., Nezamabadi, N., Rabani, M. and Panahi, H. A. (2013). A new functionalized resin and its application in flame atomic absorption spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts of heavy metal ions after solid phase extraction in water samples. Microchem.J., 106;
23.Qiu, H., Lv, L., Pan,
24.Zolfaghari, G.,
25.Aguado, J., Arsuaga, J. M., Arencibia, A., Lindo, M. and Gascón, V. (2009). Aqueous heavy metals removal by adsorption on
26.Zhang, L., Yu, C., Zhao, W., Hua, Z., Chen, H., Li, L. and Shi, J. (2007). Preparation of
silicas and their application to heavy metal ions adsorption. J.
27.Mureseanu, M., Reiss, A., Stefanescu, I., David, E., Parvulescu, V., Renard, G. and Hulea, V. (2008). Modified
28.Xue, X. and Li, F. (2008). Removal of Cu (II) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto functionalized
29.Heidari, A., Younesi, H. and Mehraban, Z. (2009). Removal of Ni (II), Cd (II), and Pb (II) from a ternary aqueous solution by amino functionalized mesoporous and nano mesoporous silica. Chem Eng J., 153(1);
30.Shahbazi, A., Younesi, H. and Badiei, A. (2011). Functionalized
(II)and Cd (II) heavy metal ions in batch and fixed bed column. Chem Eng J., 168(2);
31.Najafi, M., Yousefi, Y. and Rafati, A. (2012). Synthesis, characterization and adsorption studies of several heavy metal ions on
32