Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2019, Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages: 399-403
Teachers are quite satisfied with the real relationship
between students. They all agree that the atmosphere inside
the student groups is friendly; students are able to work in a
team, which has a positive impact on the learning process.
Teachers note that the real the relationship between students
is close to perfect. The ideal relationship, in their opinion, is
based on mutual support, cooperation and healthy
competition.
Regarding the real attitude of students to teachers, the
majority of respondents noted that they are satisfied with the
fact that they are respected, treated with a certain reverence.
The ideal relationship between the teacher and the students,
the respondents identified as follows: a relationship in which
there is partnership, an understanding of the principles of the
organization of the learning process, readiness for constant
dialogue, and, of course, interest in the subject on both sides.
group, developed and changed in connection with social,
economic and political factors and what is a modern student,
is largely the result of cultural heritage, and not only
associated with historical events.
References
1. Alisov EA, Cherdymova EI, Trubina GF, Yakushev AN,
Zhdanov SP, Popova OV, Kobzar-Frolova MN. Study of
Dominant Type of Student Ecological Focus. Ekoloji. 2018 Jan
1
;27(106):357-62.
2
3
.
.
Andreeva GM. Methodological problems of modern
development of American social psychology. Question of
psychology. 1974;2: 124-131.
Cherdymova EI, Faleeva LV, Ilkevich TG, Sharonov IA,
Sayfutdinova GB, Leusenko IV, Popova OV. Socio-
Psychological Factors that Contribute to and Impede the Process
of Student Eco-Vocational Consciousness Formation. Ekoloji
Dergisi. 2019 Jan 1(107).
4
.
Cherdymova EI, Prokopyev AI, Karpenkova TV, Pravkin SA,
Ponomareva NS, Kanyaeva OM, Ryazapova LZ, Anufriev AF.
EcoArt Therapy as a Factor of Students' Environmental
Consciousness Development. Ekoloji Dergisi. 2019 Jan 1(107).
5
Conclusions
The quality of the future specialist’s training at the
University depends on the educational dialogue in the system
teacher - student. In the process of study, the teacher
develops his/her own idea of each of the students and,
therefore, based on it attitude to each of them. It is expressed
in different ways, in the evaluation of seminars, tests and
exams. It should also be noted the comments and various
statements that teachers give to students for one reason or
another.
This issue has been studied in detail by various
researchers. It turned out that during the dialogue that takes
place between the teacher and the student, much depends on
the psychological characteristics of people. They are
respectively interpreted through behavior, facial expressions,
speech and appearance.
In this connection, it is expedient to turn to the study of
the personality of the student, namely, as represented by
his/her image. The term image is widely used in various
fields of knowledge. It is widespread within cultural
disciplines, such as literature, painting, music, etc. In
addition, this concept is applied in philosophy, psychology
and sociology.
Such a different application of this term is because,
firstly, it opens up great theoretical and empirical possibilities
in the study of the phenomena of reality, and, secondly, it is
an interdisciplinary concept that does not limit the researcher
in the object of this approach. It should be noted that now, the
concept of image is actively used to analyze the socio-
cultural aspects of life. In social disciplines, the tradition of
using this term came from philosophy.
Now students are perceived as different in composition
social and cultural community, which performs a certain
function: the creation and accumulation of symbolic capital,
withdraw to the advanced part of the intelligentsia of the
nation. This point of view led to a change in the methodology
of studying students. However, none of the above-mentioned
gave a complete idea of what students are. The approaches of
the past described the static position of the social group, not
giving an idea of the dynamics, ignoring the transition.
Thus, we can observe that throughout the twentieth
century and to this day, the principles of methodology of
studying of students are transformed more and more every
day. We also observe that the students of Russia, as a social
5. Chertok TV. Psychological features of interpersonal interaction
of students in process of studying at University. Proceedings of
Samara scientific center of Russian Academy of Sciences.
2
012;14(2): 180-182.
6
7
.
.
Clark JОЕ. International business terms. London: Lessons
professional publishing, 2006.
Filonenko VI. Modern Russian students in transitive society:
contradictions and paradoxes of socialization. Rostov on Don:
Publishing house of Institute of professional education,
pedagogical Institute of southern Federal University, 2009.
8. Ganieva YN, Azitova GS, Chernova YA, Yakovleva IG,
Shaidullina AR, Sadovaya VV. Model of high school students
professional education. Life Science Journal. 2014;11(8):504.
9
.
Ikonnikova SN. Sociology of youth. Leningrad: Znaniye
publishing house, 1985.
1
0. Isaeva EG. Features of adaptation of former high school students
of different status in the student group. Collective and
personality: personal in group and group in personal.
Makhachkala, 1988; 16-21.
11. Ivanov AE. Russian Students of the late XIX - early XX century.
Moscow: ROSSPEN publishing house, 1999.
1
2. Kovziridze MA. Factors influencing formation of professional
motivation of students in modern world. MIR (Modernization.
Innovations. Development.). 2010;3: 58-64.
3. Kvon GM, Vaks VB, Kalimullin AM, Bayanova AR,
Shaidullina AR, Dolzhikova AV, Lapidus NI. Developing the
Informational and Digital Environment of a University: Problem
Analysis and Assessment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics,
Science and Technology Education. 2019 May 20;15:10.
1
14. Lisovskogo VT, Shtarke U. Graduate of the 80s: sociological
essay. Leningrad: Leningrad University publishing House, 1990.
1
5. Panasyuk AY. Image Formation: strategies, psycho-technics,
psycho-technologies. Moscow. Omega-L publishing house,
2
007.
1
6. Petrova TE. Russian students and higher education. Moscow:
Socium publishing house, 1995.
17. Petrova TE. Sociology of students in Russia: stages and
regularities of formation. St.Petersburg: Belvedere, 2000.
18. Radetskaya SV. Dependence of concepts of real and ideal
personality from personality characteristics of students and
faculty profile. Nauchny poisk. 2012;2(5): 19-22.
1
9. Shaidullina AR, Morov AV, Morova NS, Petrova TN, Kirillova
OV, Kirillova TV, Riazantzeva IM. The Features of Social
Partnership as a Mechanism for the Integration of Education and
Production. Review of European Studies. 2015;7(3): 292-297.
4
02