2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 654-658  
J. Environ. Treat. Tech.  
ISSN: 2309-1185  
Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com  
Economy Digitalization: Information Impact on  
Market Entities  
Indira G. Salimyanova *, Aleksandr A. Novikov 2,3, Elena V. Novikova 3,2, Irina V.  
1
4
5
6
7
Lushchik , Alina F. Savderova , Natalia V. Berezina , Lyudmila G. Rudenko , Ruslan M.  
Allalyev 8  
1
Department of Innovation Management, St. Petersburg state University of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia  
2
Department of National Economics, the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia  
3
Department of Economics and Finance, Moscow International University, Moscow, Russia  
4
Department of Finance and International Settlements, Monetary and Credit Relations, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia  
5
Department of Finance, Credit and Economic Security, Chuvash State University, Cheboksary, Russia  
6
Department of Finance, Credit and Economic Security, Chuvash State University, Cheboksary, Russia  
7
Faculty of Economics and Finance, Moscow Witte University, Moscow, Russia  
8
Department of Civil Legal Disciplines, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia  
Received: 25/07/2019  
Accepted: 01/09/2019  
Published: 02/092019  
Abstract  
The development of priority areas of science and technology - locomotive industries that stimulate innovation activity of the  
economy as a whole supports the development and competitiveness of national economic systems. Nowadays there is a problem of  
changing the system of priorities generated by the fourth industrial revolution and its key direction  digitalization. The purpose of  
the article is to assess the impact of the digital economy elements on modern socio-economic processes. The authors present an  
analysis of industrial revolutions and their projections for further economic and technological breakthroughs. Based on an  
interdisciplinary approach and based on well-known institutional economic theories, the authors identify new economic trends  
emerging in the digital economy. The theoretical forecast of the economic market subjects’ behavior in the conditions of information  
influence is executed.  
Keywords: Economy Digitalization, Socio-Economic Processes, Economic and Technological Breakthroughs, Digital Economy  
1
taking steps to accelerate digital development. According to  
the Organization for economic cooperation and development,  
1
Introduction  
Increased attention to the problems of digitalization of the  
areas of social and economic life can be noted not only in  
Economics but also in social development and psychology (7,  
32 of the 36 member countries of the organization, as well as  
6
partner countries have national digital strategies. Large-  
scale programs for the development of the digital economy  
operate in the US, China and the European Union countries.  
According to Boston Consulting Group data, the share of  
digital technologies in GDP has tended to increase in the last  
decade in different countries. Thus, according to 2018, the  
absolute leaders in the share of digital GDP are the US with  
1
4, 15, 17, 20, 26). This indicates  
a
significant  
interdisciplinary connection between the problems of  
integration of digital technologies in the life of both  
individual subjects, social groups and institutions. The study,  
according to the authors, among other things, is also relevant  
due to the following reasons. The introduction of new digital  
technologies increases productivity, reduces business costs,  
increases the availability of information and reduces barriers  
to entry into new markets  and has a multiplier effect on the  
development of the economy as a whole. Being aware of the  
high importance of digital technologies, many countries are  
25% and China with 13%. With the ratio of digital to global  
GDP, the US owns 25% of digital GDP and 35% of global  
GDP, China  25% of global GDP. However, this figure is  
growing more rapidly than in other countries. The digital  
share of French GDP of slightly more than 8%, share of the  
digital German GDP was slightly less than 8%. The  
remaining countries' digital GDP is well below global GDP  
(
10).  
All digital technologies have significantly changed the  
Corresponding author: Indira G. Salimyanova, Department  
of Innovation Management, St. Petersburg state University of  
world, and there has been a total change in business models.  
The modern development of markets is characterized by an  
Economics,  
St.  
Petersburg,  
Russia.  
E-mail:  
saliindira@yandex.ru.  
6
54  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 654-658  
increasing use of technological solutions. Investments from  
traditional sectors are increasingly flowing into digital ones.  
Moreover, in the global aspect, this leads to a high degree of  
market uncertainty, as well as competitive risks caused not so  
much by economic factors as by social and political trends in  
recent years. Together, this creates an institutional  
environment in which market actors interact. The study of  
trends in this environment is relevant in the context of the  
expansion of theoretical views and approaches in the field of  
institutional Economics, as well as due to the high dynamics  
of the digital economy.  
driving force of science there is an optimization of the system  
of involvement in the production of a new generation of  
specialists capable of creating  
a
highly intelligent  
environment focused on the development of the digital  
economy. Thus, the fourth industrial revolution, which is  
multifaceted and affects such indicators as investment, gross  
domestic product, productivity, education, consumption,  
trade, employment, inflation, etc., will lead to irreversible  
transformation in production and business (2, 3, 9).  
Therefore, there is a need for new responsive mechanisms for  
the transition of all systems to the digitization in all spheres  
of life, which is they should be supplied by the new  
regulatory challenges, developed a new scheme of data  
management, and solved educational problems of specialists’  
training of a new type, capable to exist in the new digital  
culture.  
2
Materials and Methods  
2
.1 Digitalization as a Result of the Industrial Revolution  
The digital economy as a modern key direction was  
proclaimed at the 46th world economic forum, held in Davos  
in 2016. The motto of the forum Leading the Fourth  
industrial revolution was defined by K. Schwab (2016); this  
revolution is "a mixture of technologies of the physical,  
digital and biological world, which creates new opportunities  
and affects political, social and economic systems". The  
author, considering the importance of revolutionary changes  
in the development of society, identifies the following  
periods of industrial revolutions:  
2
.2 Information base and research methods  
The information base for the study is the official data  
sources, as well as the analysis of the experience and practice  
of a number of large and medium-sized enterprises operating  
in Russia in the fields of industrial production and  
information technology. The study was conducted through  
audits and in-depth interviews with company executives. The  
basis of the study was the institutional approach system of  
cognitive principles that focus on the interpretation of  
historical reality in line with institutional theories developed  
in various fields of social and humanitarian knowledge (13,  
1. The first industrial revolution (1760-1840s), is  
characterized by the construction of Railways, the invention  
of the steam engine, the development of mechanical  
production.  
23). While analyzing institutional approaches in the field of  
2. The second industrial revolution (Late XIX mid XX  
sociology and at the same time analyzing them from  
economic positions, it is impossible not to pay attention to the  
problems of institutional dynamics, and what social  
phenomena are the basis of consumer preferences and  
expectations are. Therefore, N. Fligstein (1996) identifies  
three main elements:  
century), is characterized by the spread of electricity and the  
introduction of the conveyor, the emergence of mass  
production.  
3. The third industrial revolution (the Beginning of 1960  
-
ies of XX century  the end of XX century), is characterized  
by the development of semiconductors, electronic computing  
machines, personal computers, the Internet.  
Institutional  
formations,  
or  
[institutional  
arrangements], allowing agents to organize their activities in  
the markets;  
4. The fourth industrial revolution (the beginning of the  
XXI century now), is characterized by mobile  
communication and the spread of the Internet, miniature  
production devices, the development and application of  
artificial intelligence in all fields of knowledge, digital  
technology, the development of biological engineering;  
flexible interaction at the global level of virtual and physical  
systems of production forms.  
Motivational structure of agents [structure of  
incentives], which determines the immediate motivational  
reasons for their actions;  
Concepts of control [conceptions of control], helping  
to develop an understanding of business processes and  
strategies for their own actions.  
Radical technological breakthroughs based on software,  
characteristic of the third industrial revolution, are being  
modified every year, becoming perfect, transforming  
production and economic activities, improving the quality of  
life. The second machine age is not only about smart and  
interconnected machines and systems. Its range of action is  
much wider. At the same time, there are waves of further  
breakthroughs in a wide variety of areas: from decoding  
information recorded in human genes up to nanotechnology,  
V.V. Radaev (2001) defines institutional entities as rules  
that are both the basis and the result of economic actions.  
Their structure includes the following basic elements:  
property rights; management structures; exchange rules. In  
the context of the high dynamics of the modern world, it is  
noteworthy to define the institutional dynamics of H.  
Schelsky (1970), according to which the dynamics is the  
basic circumstance for social change due to the continuous  
process of production of new needs.  
from renewable energy up to quantum computing.  
A
According to the authors, the following institutional  
theories should be considered in the context of the topic:  
distinctive feature of the last industrial revolution from the  
previous three is the self-synthesis of innovative technologies  
into increasingly advanced and efficient ones, that is, the  
development of technologies is exponential. The speed of the  
avalanche-like flow of innovations, the pace of their  
development and diffusion are unprecedented. Based on the  
the theory of property rights, in which in addition to  
the work of R. Coase (2007) "The firm, the market and the  
low" and A.A. Alchian (1977) "Economic forces at work" we  
allocated the classification of A.M. Honoré (1961), namely:  
6
55  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 654-658  
ownership, use, management, sovereign rights, perpetual  
rights and the rights of ownership non-use to the detriment;  
example, we can trace the following pattern, which is based  
on the above-defined information influence: the emergence,  
development and availability of technologies for the creation  
and transfer of information content greatly facilitates the  
actions of subjects in the field of promotion of views,  
opinions, ideas; this in turn expands the capabilities of each  
individual subject - consumer to conduct an active social life  
and position that can be perceived by such a subject as their  
own development and well-being; private social activity  
naturally generates demand and economic supply, which is  
expressed not only in increasing the number of non-profit  
organizations, but also in the development (primarily) of  
small businesses that are ready to provide services, for  
example, in the field of crowdfunding.  
The theory of transaction costs, considering the  
transaction as the basic unit of analysis of market  
participants’ interaction. The nature of the theory is  
microanalysis, behavioral analysis, study of the specificity of  
assets, etc. O. Williamson (1996) in "The Economic Insights  
of Capitalism" indicates that the activities of modern  
organizations are largely based on minimizing transaction  
costs. It is important to note that it is necessary to study the  
elements of this theory, which are acquiring a completely  
new meaning in modern conditions;  
the theory of optimal contract (authors  Nobel  
laureates, 11), which determines the system of relationships  
in determining the terms of the contract in terms of error in  
the information space of the transaction or the specifics of the  
integration of agents in the process of their economic  
interaction. In addition to conflict resolution, contract theory  
explores opportunities to increase trust between the parties  
and contributes to the development of General terms and  
conditions of contracts and agreements;  
It is appropriate to evaluate the information impact from  
the standpoint of institutional analysis: on property rights  
(theory of property rights); the theory of transaction costs; the  
theory of optimal contract; the theory of public choice. The  
result is presented in table 1.  
It is clear from the table that at present:  
1) property rights and opportunities for their use by the  
owner are limited economically and socially, namely, on the  
one hand, by the problem of saving resources, reducing costs  
and the production of a competitive product, and on the other  
hand, by public control (analysis in the framework of the  
theory of property rights);  
the theory of public choice (5), which studies the  
various ways and methods by which people use government  
agencies and public institutions in their own interests, the  
subject of its analysis is the decision-making process in both  
external and internal uncertainty. The theory explores the  
processes taking place in society, the correspondence of  
public choice to the real preferences of society and the  
conditions of their convergence. The theory is of research  
interest because of the transformation of political and social  
institutions, as well as the gradual change in the priorities of  
national economies.  
2) Transaction costs are directly affected by information,  
i.e. trend information impact. Firstly, transaction costs  
vary depending on the application of modern information  
technologies to the process of concluding an economic  
transaction  contract; secondly, the social side of the issue  
is as follows: the adoption and approval by the society of  
information technologies’ use, as well as the availability of  
confidence in this is a key factor influencing the economy of  
the transaction. Thus, the main conclusion on the theory of  
transaction costs is the convergence of economic and  
sociological approaches. It is important to note that the focus  
of the theory shifts from the description of the behavioral  
characteristics of the subject to the analysis of the behavioral  
aspects of social groups (analysis in the framework of the  
theory of transaction costs);  
3
Results  
The development and structure of modern markets is  
determined by the nature of factors that reflect the objective  
processes taking place in the world economy. The nature of  
the factors is, first, technological development, and especially  
data transfer and storage technologies; second, increased  
political and economic competition between developed and  
developing countries; and third, changes in consumption and  
choice patterns that threaten the development of traditional  
sectors of the economy in the medium term.  
The modern role of information is remarkable, which can  
be considered both as a means of production of services (for  
example, introduction into social rating systems of  
individuals and legal entities), and as a product that has an  
impact on economic decision-making (information on the  
financial solvency of the contractor). At the same time,  
information does not pose a threat to traditional industries,  
but rather expands their capabilities through the emergence of  
appropriate technologies of cloud solutions, technologies of  
Internet of things, big data, etc.  
3) It is possible to implement the concept of smart  
contracts, described in the work of N. Szabo (1994). Its main  
idea is that almost all types and terms of contracts related to  
obligations, information protection and property rights could  
be implemented using digital technologies. The deal made by  
the principals will strive for optimality, and the negative  
impact of opportunism and asymmetry of information will be  
minimized. This should be achieved through the operation of  
a special computer Protocol, which is based on algorithms  
that allow automating the transaction, while the Protocol  
provides full control of the transaction.  
4) Economics and politics in the theory of public choice  
act as mutual prerequisites, interact with each other, and  
constantly move one into another.  
Thus, the trend of information influence has a global  
impact on the development of socio-economic systems. For  
6
56  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 654-658  
Table 1: Analysis of information impact in the context of institutional analysis  
Impact analysis  
Institutional theory  
Type of right  
Degree of influence  
The development of the information technology market reduces the cost of property  
control due to the technical capabilities for rapid access to information from anywhere  
Information technologies provide the owner with previously unavailable opportunities  
for investment planning and analysis of the counterparties' activities  
Possessions  
Use  
The procedure of granting rights to contractors for access to resources or property is  
simplified. This reduces transaction costs and allows you to refuse the services of  
intermediaries  
management  
Theory of property rights  
Due to the development of information transparency and the availability of third parties  
to control the actions of the owner, the owner him/herself may be limited in the rights to  
dispose of property in view of the obligations to third parties  
The trend has a significant impact on the market and contributes to the emergence of  
products with limited ownership over time. This could include any cashiering services  
when the owner is limited to the time of use of the product  
Sovereign right  
Perpetual right  
In this case, only the level of development of the information society can put before the  
owner a moral barrier to the use of property to the detriment of third parties. Often  
reputation costs can be extremely high  
not using the property  
to harm  
ex-ante transaction costs  
kinds  
Characteristic  
The use of IT technologies in the preparation of the contract allows integrating the  
Drafting  
projects  
documents  
of  
and  
related  
contract  
other  
to  
most complex aspects of economic exchange (transaction) in the General planning  
scheme, which contributes to the drafting of the most complete contract. The speed  
of dissemination of information allows you to respond quickly to the actions of the  
counterparty. Transaction costs are reduced, but variables are growing  
Extensive opportunities for the creation and storage of information content on the  
one hand allow more complete use of all open sources of information, but on the  
other  it leads to the emergence of garbage sources. The cost of negotiations is  
increased by the need to process an array of information. In the future, such costs  
will be reduced due to the emergence of new algorithms for information analysis,  
which does not exclude variable costs  
economic exchange  
Negotiation  
Transaction cost theory  
Guarantee provision  
Does not affect the problem of contract guarantee costs  
Ex-post transaction costs  
kinds  
Characteristic  
It is expressed in the development of IT able to predict the outcome of economic  
exchange, causing the possibility of creating the optimal configuration of the  
Adapting to unexpected contract for contractors. It is also evident in the implementation of the current  
events  
monitoring of the contract, when due to the growth of sources of information there  
are many opportunities to fully assess the parameters of the transaction at the  
implementation stage and, thus, reduce the ex - post cost.  
The exact fulfillment of the  
Does not affect the problem of costs for the exact fulfillment by the counterparty of  
obligations under the contract  
obligations  
contract  
under  
the  
Circumstances  
Decision  
The opportunism and the asymmetry Reducing the generation of unproductive (including alternative (imputed)  
of the contract  
Contract design goals  
Problems  
costs increases the efficiency of resource allocation.  
1
. Controllability (observability), as the ability of participants to monitor  
the performance of each other's contract or to prove their effectiveness to  
other principals.  
Optimal contract theory  
2
. Verifiability, as the principal's ability to prove to the arbitrator that the  
contract has been performed or breached, or the arbitrator's ability to find it  
in other ways.  
3
. Privacy, as the principle that information and control over the content  
and performance of the contract should be distributed between the parties  
only to the extent necessary for the performance of this contract.  
Degree of influence  
The problem of pricing and market Information, especially on the actions of state institutions in the field of  
deficits, as well as the elimination or regulation of the electronic economy, significantly affects the actions of  
limitation of market competition in market participants. (Example  the collapse of bitcoin). The information  
the field of electronic economy  
in this case is of significant investment interest  
Public choice theory  
State institutions of power do not always have the opportunity to receive  
reliable information about the state of the market and make the right  
decision.  
The probability of making a false  
decision at a high (state) level  
Restriction of subjects in the right to It is possible only in the case of prohibitions on access to sources of  
make economic decisions  
information through technical blocking.  
6
57  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 654-658  
Transparency and openness of information creates the  
need to create flexible mechanisms that can balance the  
economic basis of behavior in the political process and the  
political methods of intervention in the market economy,  
since the prohibitions within the framework of information  
influence are unproductive (27).  
economic processes (adaptation or withdrawal from the  
market)  
References  
1. Alchian AA. Economic forces at work. Indianapolis: Liberty  
Press. 1977.  
2
3
4
.
.
.
Andieva EYu, Filchakova VD. Digital economy of the future.  
Industry 4.0. Applied mathematics and fundamental Informatics.  
2016;3:214-218.  
Babkin AV, Khvatova TYu. Model of national innovation  
system based on knowledge economy. Economics and  
management. 2010;12: 170-176.  
Benz DS. Theory of contracts as a mainstream: on the issue of  
awarding the Nobel prize to O. Hart and B. Holmström. Bulletin  
of Chelyabinsk state University. 2017;2: 116-121.  
4
Discussion and Conclusion  
Economic theories, in contrast to sociological theories,  
appeal to the behavior of market participants, whose actions  
are carried out in the existing institutional environment.  
The behavioral characteristics of subjects are Central in  
institutional economic theories. The views expressed in  
economic theories give an idea of the consequences of  
subjects’ actions, but to a lesser extent reveal the root causes  
of social nature, which are fundamental. In turn, sociological  
approaches consider institutionalization more fully through  
the fundamental social nature, and the economic approach  
allows better assessing the consequences of market actors’  
interaction under favorable or unfavorable conditions of the  
internal and/or external institutional environment. The set of  
institutional theories makes it possible to give the  
multidimensional assessment of information impact on socio-  
economic relations (4, 9, 22, 25).  
5. Buchanan JM, Tullock G. The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor:  
University of Michigan Press. 1962.  
6. Coase R. Firm, market and law. Moscow: New publishing house.  
2
007.  
7
8
.
.
Derbeneva EN, Guseynova AG. Components of the success of  
the digital economy. Young scientist. 2019;25:195-197.  
Fligstein N. Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach  
to Market Institutions. American Sociological Review. 1996;61:  
6
56-673.  
9. Giddens E. An elusive world. How globalization is changing our  
lives. Moscow: Whole world. 2004.  
Information technology, which is part of the digital  
economy, has an impact on transaction costs. This obvious  
conclusion would be incomplete if the authors did not add to  
it the fact that modern society and markets are not always  
ready to accept and use information technologies, even  
despite the reduction of possible costs. This once again  
proves the irrationality of market participants’ behavior.  
According to the authors, the issue of trust also depends on  
the scale of the economic transaction  the smaller the  
potential financial risks, the higher the trust. The authors  
would like to highlight the theory of transaction costs as a  
theory that, in their opinion, most clearly demonstrates the  
impact of economic but also social factors on the rationality  
of contractors’ behavior.  
10. Gref: 35% of digital GDP belongs to the US. (2018). In  
PLUSworld. URL: http:// PLUSworld.ru  
1
1
1. Hart O, Holmström B. Theory of Contracts. Advances in  
Economic Theory. Fifth World Congress of the Econometric  
Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1987.  
2. Honoré AM. Ownership. Guest A. G. Oxford Essays in  
Jurisprudence: Collaborative Work. Oxford: Oxford  
A
University Press. 1961.  
13. North D. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives.  
2017;1:97-112.  
1
4. Panshin B. Digital economy: features and trends. Science and  
innovation. 2016;3:17-20.  
1
5. Pestik TA. The development of digital technologies and the  
future of psychology. Bulletin of the Moscow state regional  
University. Series: Psychological Sciences. 2017;3: 6-15.  
6. Radaev VV. New institutional approach: the construction of a  
research scheme. Economic sociology. 2001;3: 5-26.  
1
First, under the influence of trends, there are changes in  
the institutional environment, as modern solutions (especially  
digital) lead to the emergence of new institutions and the  
abolition or transformation of old ones; secondly, we can  
increasingly talk about the strengthening of the influence of  
external factors (primarily socio-political), which have a  
destructive impact on the development, as a whole industry  
areas, and individual companies. This makes it more urgent  
for market players to reduce costs in the medium and long  
term and overcome isolation barriers; thirdly, in solving  
problems related to the economic development of the Russian  
Federation, the public role is increasing, reflecting the  
position of audiences on the effectiveness of the functioning  
of domestic political and economic institutions. In this case,  
the mechanisms of the digital economy, providing feedback,  
come to the first place; fourth, the digitalization of the  
economy enhances the competitiveness of both traditional  
market sectors, and contributes to the refinement of strategic  
directions of development, including through the  
objectification of individual entities’ participation in  
17. Salimyanova IG, Malyuk VI. Tools of the digital economy as an  
effective mechanism of innovative development of production  
and non-production activities. Innovative activity. 2018;3: 84-  
9
1.  
1
1
8. Schelsky H. The sociological theory of the Institution. To the  
theory of the Institution. Gutersloh: Gutersloh. 1970.  
9. Schwab K. The Fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: Eksmo.  
2
016.  
20. Sudarushkina IV, Stefanova NA. Digital economy. Azimuth of  
scientific research: Economics and management, 2017;1: 182-  
184.  
2
1. Szabo N. The Idea of Smart Contracts. URL:  
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/  
Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwintersc  
hool2006/.1994.  
2
2. Voronov YuP. Contracts instead of transactions (Nobel prize in  
Economics 2016). ECO, 2017;1: 102-119.  
23. Williamson O. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stocks,  
Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature. 2016;3: 595-  
613.  
2
4. Williamson OI. Economic institutions of capitalism. St.  
Petersburg: Lenizdat. 1996.  
6
58  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 654-658  
2
2
2
5. Wolfson YR, Volchina AE. The problem of classification of  
information society theories. Contemporary studies of social  
problems. 2017;3. URL: http://ej.soc-journal.ru  
6. Yudina MA. Social prospects of the project digital economy of  
the Russian Federation 2017-2030. The Level of lick of the  
population of regions of Russia. 2018;1: 60-  
7. Nurhayati DR, Siswadi. Growth of sesame (Sesamum  
indicumL.) plants with mediated compost biochar on coastal  
sandy land area in Bantul Regency Indonesia. Eurasia J Biosci.  
2
019;13(2):673-9.  
6
59