Models of integrated interactions organization in the field of environmental education

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 576-580

J. Environ. Treat. Tech.

ISSN: 2309-1185

Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com

Models of Integrated Interactions Organization in

the Field of Environmental Education

Marina I. Razumovskaya , Anna A. Larionova , Natalia A. Zaitseva , Olga A. Petrina ,

Marina V. Vinogradova , Natalia G. Nagay , Oksana V. Takhumova

Far Eastern State Transport University, Department Economy and Commerce, Khabarovsk, Russia

The Kosygin State University of Russia, Department of Economic Security, Audit and Controlling, (Technology. Design. Art) Moscow,

Russia

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Department of Hospitality, Tourism and Sports Industry, Moscow, Russia

The State University of Management, Department of State and Municipal Management, Moscow, Russia

Russian State Social University, Scientific and Research Institute of Prospective Trends and Technologies, Moscow, Russia

Institute of Service Sphere and Entrepreneurship of DSTU (Branch), Department of Service, Tourism and Hospitality Industry, Shakhty,

Russia

Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilina, Department Economy, Krasnodar, Russia

Received: 19/05/2019

Accepted: 27/08/2019

Published: 29/08/2019

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this research is to justify the essence of integration interaction organization in the field of

environmental education, as an interaction and estimation abstract model of the application prospects. Methodology: The leading

approach to the study of this problem was the content analysis of scientific-theoretical and practical materials, expert assessments on

the problems of business interaction and organizational integration in education. Results: Results of the study consists in the fact that

the authors described in fundamental provisions of the abstract models of integrated interactions organization in the field of

environmental education, supplemented of systematization criterion "Way of integration" : educational consortium, educational

partnership, regional educational center, resource training center, in terms of the degree of uncertainty and completeness of interaction.

The theoretical significance of the article material is deepening and expanding scientific and methodological approaches to the study

of organizational integration various forms to improve the environmental education quality. Applications of this study: The materials

of the article are of practical importance for educational organizations introducing organizational integration various forms.

Novelty/Originality of this study: The originality of the study is to confirm the choice of the business partnership model defined by

realization of innovative and standard practices in environmental education. The novelty of the research results consists in adapting

business partnerships interaction models of to the organization of integrated interaction in the field of environmental education.

Keywords: education, abstract model, organizational interaction, environmental education.

Introduction

It should be noted that the implementation logic of

integrated educational process is more complicated compared

to the technological process of learning ecology, and in the

interaction organization and management of the parties

involved in the integration, there are some peculiarities. Thus,

technological processes are less focused on the description of

the participants interaction in the execution of the educational

process (22). On the contrary, the interaction of integration

participants on the coordinated application of all skills that

may be needed to respond to requests from the external

environment, is an essential component of the effect in

education. In this regard, it is important to have integration

participants coordination and a high propensity from process

performers to business interactions. Compared to

According to general opinion of researchers, the educational

process is a collection of interconnected organizational and

economic operations that aims at reproducible and repeatable

results of educational program execution for a certain time

interval (26). For the last decade, the educational organization

have been replacing hierarchically aligned models of learning

in the field of ecology and technological approaches to their

execution on the business partnerships model and integrated

processes in education. This was their response to the demands

of the external environment to ensure the sustainability of life

in the conditions of ever-increasing changes for individuals

and their communities, for business entities and their

associations, for states and their unions.

Corresponding author: Marina I. Razumovskaya, Far Eastern State Transport University, Department Economy and Commerce,

Khabarovsk, Russia. E-mail: 9242222540@mail.ru.

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 576-580

technological processes those of organizational interaction

undergo changes much more often. Usually this occurs

following the change in the conditions for organizing

innovative and standard practices in training and increases the

risk of unacceptably large cost for modification an integrated

process for converting information and resources (10,16,24).

What has been said above actualizes the problem of

developing abstract models of integrated interactions

organization in the field of environmental education. Such

models must have certain similarity with respect to the

- organizations contributing to the identification and attraction

of resources from the external environment to achieve standard

learning outcomes;

- organizations - carriers of external environment resources for

the execution of production and organizational processes in the

implementation of educational programs.

As a result of changes in the relations realized by partners

in the space of discrete states of the integrated process,

information evolves (turns into a new quality). It is believed,

along with the change of information and business partnership

will consistently go through the life cycle stage of relations

development, stage of stagnation, stage of decline. And the

main difference of one business partnership organizational

system from the other will determine the time of each stage

implementation.

We need to recall that the beginning of solving the

information movement problem following a change in

business environment conditions was given by the

methodology of business process reengineering (1, 12, 13). Its

continuation are business cases of best practices (17,18,19). In

the future, theoretical concepts of controlling end-to-end

processes were developed (4, 23, 27). However, we need to

take into account the need to adopt the following academic

position at the transition from the competition in

environmental education to cooperation: the uncertainty

compensator role in the value of playing in an integrated

manner performs dominant element. And for that, it solves

problems relating to satisfy the requirements on a variety of

data presence (hidden knowledge and information), which are

keeping the parties to integrate in different organizational

systems, characterized by properties timelines methods

performance, evaluation and control methods.

original, and based on this

executable) models will be productive that will be invariant

in meeting at least some of the environment requirements.

the creation of material

(

Methodological Framework

To define the essence of integration interaction

organization in the field of environmental education, as an

abstract model of interaction and prospect estimates of its

application methods we used content analysis of scientific-

theoretical and practical materials, expert evaluations on the

problems of business interaction and organizational

integration in education.

Application of these methods helped to solve the problem

of modeling the ratio between direct participants of the first

business partnership on the theoretical foundations research:

(

Business models (for example, school activity systems

Activity system school), process school (Process school),

cognitive school (Cognitive school), technology school

(

Technology-driven school), school of strategic choice

Strategic choiceschool), recombination school

Recombination school), dual school (Duality school), etc.)

11);

Marketing affiliate Relations (3,5,15,25);

Competitive advantages organizations (2,7,8).

For the approaches discussed above, the explanation of

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Abstract Model Development for the Integrated

Interactions Organization in the Field of Environmental

Education

causes and consequences lies at the intersection of the resource

approach problem fields and the relational approach to finding

a strategic advantage due to changes in organizational

structures. We also observe consent in the fact that the changes

are applied to inner data streams of parties involved in the

inter-organization interactions. The leading feature in

integrated interactions are traditionally considered the ability

of business partners to establish relationships among

themselves in a non-systemic manner. This ability is

manifested through communicating, that is information

exchange between the participants of the business partnership.

During the exchange there occurs identification, firstly,

external requirements, allowing you to define the purpose, and

secondly, mutual claims to the organizational system in place

the fact of interaction to modify the properties of the

educational program.

According to the results of the study it can be concluded

that while developing abstract models of integrated

interactions organization in the field of environmental

education the following points are fundamental:

- each participant of a business partnership builds a joint

activity around processes (choice including transaction costs),

which by their nature differ from the existing organizational

processes (choice including coordination costs);

- the problem of ambiguity of choice is resolved by the

participant in a business partnership who generates external

events, has the ability to influence the characteristics of

interactions. In other words, who dominates the integrated

processes, acts as the leading compensator of uncertainty in it;

- at the initial stage of the joint activity, all participants of the

business partnership should have an idea of the values that

have yet to be created and the expected timing of interaction

in order to create new value.

Communicating is characterized by instability and

informational, and material reflection of the parameters

established for the processes of meeting the updated external

environment requirements. The level of instability causes the

reaction of mutual influence of integration participants in

environmental education from the following:

We believe, the choice of business partnership model is

determined by the prospects for innovative and standard

environmental

education

practices

implementation.

individuals and their groups, including professionally related

Conditions relevant to the organization of one and the other

type of practice are presented in the table 1. Based on their

strongest sides, partnership participants create an opportunity

in environmental education, focusing on one or more value

factors (consumer, service, scale, positioning).

to participation in information and resources transformation

processes, for private benefits in the educational programs’

implementation (21);

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 576-580

Table 1: The organization conditions of innovative and standard practices in the process of providing educational services

Nature of organization

Conditions

Innovative practices

Standard practices

A variety of services while minimizing the share

of assets adapted to a one-time (developing)

learning process in general pedagogical (private

pedagogical) technology.

Unification of services to obtain an economic

effect on the scale in a repetitive learning

process in general pedagogical (private

pedagogical) technology.

Complex

complementary

asset management

Unique (developing) processes (production,

organizational, regulatory) with the unpredictable organizational, regulatory) with a predictable

probability of failure in obtaining parameters of

the material implementation of the system's

response to external demand.

Stabilized processes (production,

Processes

conversions

information and

resources

probability of failure to obtain the parameters

of the material implementation of the

system's response to external demand.

Control

by processes

On the state of the control object with feedback

and (or) project control method.

Software control method.

Management of competencies based on

existing technologies, application of best

practices and organizational knowledge.

People management

and their groups

Management of abilities and skills, focused on

the formation of new practices.

Control

Budgeting and evaluation of financial

activities.

condition

resources

Control

structure

systems

Estimated financing costs.

Hierarchical organization of interacting

subsystems with coordination at the higher

level.

Process organization with functional adjustment.

Source: compiled by O.L. Kondratieva and M.I. Razumovskaya (14)

In this case, substrate (real) interactions are arranged

according to external environment actualized requests

materialization. In other words, it is the very same technology

integrated educational process, which is highlighted from the

usual activities. To explain the evolution of an integrated

educational process there introduced the conception of

dynamic capabilities for innovative and standard practices in

relation to the logical knowledge chain and experience - the

common actions and behavior rules – commonly "people and

their ways of working to create value." In such a chain, the first

two parts should be considered as an information base of

integrated processes, which is the area of responsibility for the

dominant participant. The third part of the chain means the

movement of information in the labyrinth between the

organizational elements of the partnership.

acquisition by the dominant participant of specific assets in the

region and environmental education. In these zones, we can

expect a relatively low cost of implementing innovative

practices. Upper left square characterizes stable interactions of

business partnership participants who are familiar informally

and very closely, focused on standardizing processes. The

upper right square corresponds to dynamic cooperation with

very close relations, highly appreciated by the partnership

participants, and heightened attention to risk factors, since

uncertainty becomes the rule rather than the exception. In such

squares from the innovative practices can be expected of high

cost, created by various participants in the integration (6,9).

The table 2 shows abstract model of business partnerships

in education. The network integration forms, which were

previously systematized in this study (20) by criterion "Way

of integration", educational consortium, educational

partnership, regional Education Center, resource training

center. They are distributed to the four squares in the following

way. The two of the lower squares are characterized by a

relatively small degree of relations closeness, which means

that the participants of a business partnership open up to each

other a small part of their basic abilities and value. Conversely,

the two upper squares determine the substantial closeness of

the relationship, different from the usual activities in one or

more of the following aspects (28).

Proper information exchange in jointly implemented

processes provides

coordination mechanism for

communication elements. It links elements that are “tangled”

in different organizational systems and information as

“

islands” of data that people accumulate over time through

their own experience in the successive stages of the dynamic

integration capabilities development of environmental

education programs. Two dimensions allow to characterize

such opportunities - the proximity of relationships and

dynamic relationship. Focusing on them, we further present

the abstract model of business partnership in the form of a

four-square matrix.

The lower left square of the matrix defines stable

interactions with a small closeness of relations realized by

business processes participants in materialization process of

the external environment actual requests. The lower right

square indicates dynamic interactions with a low degree of

partners closeness whose relationships are established and

terminated due to the lack of great significance in the

- consumer (meet the need of new consumers or expand the

range of educational programs to existing customers);

- service (intellectual property that can be offered to existing

or new customers);

- scale (to distribute the educational program in large quantities

or over a wider area);

- positioning (promotion of the educational program from the

standpoint of better quality inherent in the participant of a

business partnership higher status).

Table 2: Matrix for assessing the dynamic capabilities of integrated interactions in education

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 576-580

Closer relationship

Educational

consortium

Regional

educational

Centre

stable

development

Educational

partnership

Resource

teaching

Centre

dynamic

development

Less close relationship

Source: adapted by O.L. Kondratieva and M.I. Razumovskaya, R. Welbourne (14, 28)

Two right squares (interaction on the basis of regional

Philosophy. Boston: D. Re-idel Publishing Company. 1974.

education Al and Resource training Center, characterized by a

high degree of uncertainty for the period in which innovation

should be implemented quickly and on a regular basis, guided

by reducing transaction costs and coordination. In periods of

less uncertainty or in stable markets, a more stable relationship

can occur between participants in a business partnership

5. Christopher, M., Payne, A., and Ballantyne, D. Relationship

Marketing: Bringing Quality, Customer Service and Marketing

Together. Oxford: Oxford University.1991.

Davoudi SMM, Fartash K, Venera G. Zakirova, Asiya M.

Belyalova, Rashad A. Kurbanov, Anna V. Boiarchuk, Zhanna M.

Sizova. Testing the Mediating Role of Open Innovation on the

Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights and

Organizational Performance: A Case of Science and Technology

Park, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology

Education. 2018;14(4): 1359-1369.

(

educational consortium, educational partnership), indicated in

the two left squares of the matrix. The development of

interactions occurs in the direction from more dynamic to

fewer dynamic relations (28). At the same time, for all

methods of integration, be it a resource training center,

educational partnership, regional educational center,

educational consortium, there is a need for cost distribution,

risk control, and distribution of results.

Deser SB, Demirag MK. A Therapeutic Challenge: Management

of Atrial Thrombus. J Clin Exp Invest. 2016;7(4):278-82.

https://doi.org/10.5799/jcei.328366.

Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., and Kale, P. Splitting the pie: Rent

distribution in alliances and networks. Managerial and Decisions

Economics.218; 29(3): 137-148.

Conclusion

9. Fartash K., Davoudi, S.M.M., Tatiana A. Baklashova, Natalia V.

Svechnikova 4, Yulia V. Nikolaeva, Svetlana A. Grimalskaya.

The Impact of Technology Acquisition & Exploitation on

Organizational Innovation and Organizational Performance in

Knowledge-Intensive Organizations, EURASIA Journal of

Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 2018; 14(4):

According to the research results, it can be concluded that

the ability to establish partnerships in environmental education

programs as soon as possible is an objective necessity, and not

one’s own desire, for example, of the dominant integration

participant. The model choice for organizing an integrated

educational process essentially depends on how much it makes

sense to bear the costs of transactions and coordination

independently or in partnership. So, the faster, cheaper and

more productive the dominant element will be able to

eliminate uncertainties in the logical chain: "people and their

knowledge, experience - common actions and rules of

behavior - common ways of creating value”, the more

innovations can be created and applied in environmental

education using business partnership models. In the context of

innovative practices strategic management in environmental

education, this means less time and resources spent on the

formation of partnership agreements, i.e. transaction costs.

The interactions organization model with the participation of

business partners presented above is an alternative to the

evolutionary way of their development. It develops the views

of Coase R., Williamson O. and their followers that the

sustainable frontiers of business partnership depend not only

on technology, but also on the cost dynamics and various

organizational alternatives benefits.

497-1507.

0. Galushkin, A.A. Use of Information and Communications

Technology to Foster the Competitiveness of the Entrepreneurial

Organizations within the Education and Science Sector.

International Journal of Engineering & Technology. 2018;

(3.14): 323-326.

1. Gassmann, O. Exploring the Field of Business Model Innovation

Switzerland. Palgrave: MacMillan. 2016.

2. Hammer, M., and Champi, D. Reengineering the Corporation: a

Manifesto revolution in business. St.Petersburg: S.Petersburg

University.2000.

3. Kheiry, M. V., Hafezi, A. M., & Hesaraki, S. Bone Regeneration

Using Nanotechnology–Calcium Silicate Nano-Composites, UCT

Journal of Research in Science, Engineering and Technology.

013; 1(1): 1-3.

14. Kondratieva, O.L., and Razumovsky, M.I. Modeling network

integration space for educational programs. In the collection:

Problems and prospects of development management in the Midle

East, materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference

with international participation. 2018; 77-84.

5. Kushch, S.P. Current trends in the development of relations

between an industrial company and suppliers. Economic science

of modern Russia. 2006; 3: 90-95.

References

Abdikeyev, N.M., and Kiselev, A.D. Knowledge Management

Corporation and business reengineering. Moscow: Publishing

House "Infra-M" 2011.

6. Masalimova, A.R., Mikhaylovsky, M.N., Grinenko, A.V.,

Smirnova, M.E., Andryushchenko, L.B., Kochkina, M.A., and

Kochetkov, I.G. The Interrelation between Cognitive Styles and

Copying Strategies among Student Youth. Eurasia Journal of

Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2019; 15(4):

em1695. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103565

Ahuja, G.. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and

innovation:

A longitudinal study. Administrative science

quarterly. 2000. 45(3): 425-455.

Biekert, J. The Data Revolution. Target Marketing. 1992; 15: 1-

7. Melo, R., Bezerra, M. C., Dantas, J., Matos, R., de Melo Filho, I.

J., Oliveira, A. S., ... & Maciel, P. R. M. Sensitivity analysis

Bunge, M. Ontology I: The World of Systems, Treatise on Basic

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 576-580

techniques applied in cloud computing environments. In 2017

2th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and

Technologies (CISTI). 2017, June; 1-7.

8. Milner, B.W. Organization Theory. Moscow: INFRA-M. 2000.

9. Mintzberg, G. School strategies. St. Petersburg: Peter. 2000.

0. Razumovskaya, M.I., Zaitseva, N.A., Larionova, A.A.,

Chudnovskiy, A.D., and Breusova, E.A. Prospects for applying

various forms of organizational integration to improve the quality

of education. Astra Salvensis. 2018; 6: 348-36

1. Sibgatullina, T.V., Utemov, V.V., Galushkin, A.A., and Zaitseva,

N.A. Age Heterogeneity of STEM Educators. Eurasia Journal of

Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2019;15(7),

em1730. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108429

2. Sizova, Z.M., Semenova, T.V., Naydenova, N.N., Narbut, V.V.,

Chelyshkova, M.B., and Masalimova, A.R. Fairness Principle in

Accreditation of Health Specialists: The Differential Item

Functioning Method. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science

and Technology Education. 2019; 15(9): em1749.

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108485.

3. Soffer, P., and Wand, Y. On the Notion of Soft-Goals in Business

Process Modeling. Business Process Management Journal. 2005;

1(6): 663-679.

4. Tastan, S.B., & Davoudi, S.M.M. An Examination of the

Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative

Work Behavior with the Moderating Role of Trust in Leader: A

Study in the Turkish Context. Procedia social and behavioral

sciences, Elsevier. 2015; 181: 23-32.

5. Tretyak, O.A. Development of the concept of demand chain

management on new foundations. Russian Journal of

Management. 2008; 6(4): 141-148.

6. Vlckova, J., Kubiatko, M., Usak, M. The Perception of Biology

by Czech Lower Secondary School Students. Eurasia Journal of

Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2019; 15(5):

em1714. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105277

7. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. An Ontological Model of an Information

System. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 1990;

(11): 1282-1292.

8. Welbourne, R. Business partnerships: How to succeed in a joint

business. Moscow: LLC "Vershina". 2004.