Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
J. Environ. Treat. Tech.  
ISSN: 2309-1185  
Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com  
Sustainable Development Management of an  
Urban Municipality  
*
Tatyana VAZHENINA , Rada DUKA, Elena KorYakina, Nadezhda Sheveleva  
Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia  
Received: 02/07/2019  
Accepted: 27/08/2019  
Published: 03/09/2019  
Abstract  
The results of a study on the sustainable development of an urban municipality are presented in this article. The object of  
scientific work is the municipality of the city of Tyumen. The subject of the research is socio-economic and administrative relations  
that contribute to ensuring the sustainable development of urban municipalities. The purpose of the study is to develop  
recommendations and proposals for managing sustainable development of the city of Tyumen. The following hypothesis is put  
forward by the authors in this paper: there is an assumption that updating recommendations on the effective management of the  
sustainable development of the city of Tyumen in order to improve the state of the three aspects of sustainable development or to  
maintain them at an optimal level in the long term is an important principle of the administrative apparatus of the city. An optimal  
balance of economic, social and environmental condition of the city is possible with systematic management of these aspects of  
sustainable development. In this paper, the authors studied some methods for assessing the sustainable development of an urban  
municipality and proposed an improved method for assessing the sustainable development of a city. The authors also evaluated the  
sustainable development of an urban municipality using the city of Tyumen as an example. The activities and recommendations for  
managing the sustainable development of the city of Tyumen were proposed.  
Keywords: Sustainable development, Tyumen, Sustainable development assessment, Sustainable development management, Urban  
municipality, Factors for sustainable development provision, Ecological environment, Social environment, Socio-economic  
development, Resource potential.  
1
development. Therefore, it is important to properly and  
1
Introduction  
effectively manage their social, economic and environmental  
development in order to ensure comfortable living conditions  
in the city (improving the quality of life and incomes of the  
population and, as a result, replenishing budgets (2)),  
increasing the efficiency of production activities of economic  
entities of the municipality, rational use of natural resources.  
Management of an urban municipality should be aimed at  
strengthening the autonomy of local authorities, which, on  
their part, should search for the possibility of self-  
development based on their own resources (3).  
The relevance of the research topic is that at the present  
time municipal government plays an important role in the  
context of public administration. The state as a whole is  
governed through the management of municipalities. The  
need to manage sustainable urban development is caused by  
two opposite outcomes of events: urbanization of cities  
occurs, and a large concentration of people in one place  
prevails as a result, and in contrast to this fact, complex and  
contradictory socio-demographic, economic, technological,  
environmental and other problems emerge, affecting both the  
city itself and the state (1).  
1
. As a result, there is an objective need to manage the  
sustainable development of an urban municipality, providing  
favorable conditions for the socio-economic development of  
the city, developing its resource potential and innovative  
technologies, as well as creating a conceptually new structure  
of consumption and production, while maintaining ecological  
balance in the context of constant progress (4).  
The concept of sustainable development focuses on  
ensuring a balanced synthesis of three aspects of sustainable  
development. It sets targets for determining the priorities of  
socio-economic development of territories and actively  
eliminates problem areas of the municipalities’ uneven  
2
.
The object of the study is the Tyumen city  
municipality.  
The subject of the research is the socio-economic and  
administrative relations that contribute to the sustainable  
development of urban municipalities.  
3
.
Corresponding author: Tatyana VAZHENINA, Industrial  
University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia. Email:  
vazhnaiy82@yandex.ru.  
705  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
4
.
The aim of the study is to formulate  
indicators are generalized, are measurable, and reflect the  
current characteristics of all the presented factors of the  
sustainable development of the city allowing visual  
assessment of the studied urban municipality state. The  
authors identified five main indicators based on six factors of  
the territory development that describe the state of sustainable  
development of the city:  
1. City functionality. This indicator includes industrial,  
cultural and economic spheres of the city. The set of city  
functions determines its level of development (the level of  
functionality is higher when the city performs more  
functions: multifunctional, mesofunctional, monofunctional  
cities). This functionality allows characterizing the city in its  
main areas of activity and niche affiliation.  
recommendations for the effective management of Tyumen  
city municipality sustainable development.  
Statistical materials of the Territorial Body of the Federal  
State Statistics Service for the Tyumen Region, the  
Administration of the Tyumen Municipal District,  
monographs and periodicals, materials of scientific and  
practical conferences and seminars on the problem of  
sustainable development of territories became the  
informational background of this paper.  
2
Materials and Methods  
In order to assess the sustainable development of the city  
of Tyumen,  
a method for assessing the sustainable  
2
. The ratio of wages to the subsistence minimum. This  
development of urban municipalities by Bogomolova and  
Mashentsova was applied. Based on this method, factors that  
ensure sustainable urban development are assessed (5).  
According to the authors of this method, the state of the  
social sphere of the city and its infrastructure, as well as the  
environmental component, both directly depend on the  
economic condition of the territory.  
The social sphere of an urban municipality includes the  
quality of life of the population, the ecological situation and  
the economic development of the territory. The following  
rule applies for this aspect of sustainable development: "city  
development becomes sustainable when the city's economy  
becomes independent and less prone to peak points of a  
crisis. Such a city becomes autonomous and does not depend  
on the economy of other cities and the country as a whole".  
Important spheres of city life are industrial, economic and  
cultural and recreational ones. They determine the priority of  
the characteristics of the territory relative to other factors of  
sustainable development, as well as the place of the territory  
among the functional classification of cities.  
Thus, based on the above, the authors identify six main  
social, economic and environmental factors that ensure  
sustainable development: territorial management or the  
administrative apparatus; the economic condition of the  
territory; the state of the cultural sphere; economic  
development rates; the manufacturing sector; the state of the  
social sphere associated with the state of the city’s ecology.  
These factors directly affect the sustainable development  
of an urban municipality and also contribute to improving the  
competitiveness of the city, being key areas for comparing  
the studied city with other cities, as well as for possible  
changes in any factors in the future. All factors are  
interrelated and are part of one system (6). In the framework  
of the system approach, any change in one of the factors will  
inevitably entail a change in the rest of them (7).  
indicator gives an idea of the quality of life of the population  
and reflects the socio-economic situation of the city, based on  
the ratio of the minimum necessary funds for living to the  
funds that can be spent for other purposes. In other words, the  
ratio of wages to the subsistence minimum in quantitative  
terms makes it possible to determine the amount of free cash  
per capita, the solvency of the population and its material  
well-being.  
3
. The ratio of retail trade turnover to the subsistence  
minimum. This indicator represents the percentage of free  
cash of the population that is spent on purchases and  
entertainment, and also reflects the level of solvency of the  
population. The economic security of the population is  
expressed through the following dependence: the higher the  
values of this indicator, the higher the purchasing power. This  
implies the conclusion about the quality of life of the city and  
its economic climate.  
4
. Average life expectancy. This indicator reflects the  
quality of life of the population in socially significant  
directions. Average life expectancy is a fairly versatile  
indicator that includes a set of individual characteristics. One  
of these individual characteristics is the quality of health care  
and its availability, the second is the state of the  
environmental situation in the city, which contributes to the  
increase in life expectancy, or, on the contrary, affects it  
negatively. The ecological condition of the city is determined  
by the quality of the prevailing lethal diseases. Also, in the  
event of a deep study of the issue, in the context of many  
factors affecting the average life expectancy, this indicator  
can be considered in detail, including a group of indicators on  
the birth rate and infant mortality, mortality in general, and  
diseases that more often lead to deaths within a certain  
territory of the city into analysis. Combining all these  
individual indicators will allow describing the social sphere  
of the city in detail.  
Environmental factors that correlate with social factors  
include the biological, climatic and environmental features of  
the territory, and also describe the presence of natural  
resources, compliance with environmental standards in all  
sectors of the city’s activities, which influence the purity of  
the entire hydro, bio and atmosphere (8).  
The above factors characterizing the general situation in  
the city are of an exceptionally qualitative nature. The authors  
of the urban municipality sustainable development  
assessment method selected five indicators that influence  
factors in order to assess this situation in the city. The  
5
. Officially registered unemployed number per  
thousand people. The indicator reflecting the state of the  
economic sphere of the city and the current state of its  
economy. It is the main indicator of the labor market. If the  
unemployment rate is 7% or higher, this indicates a period of  
economic recession and entry into a crisis, while if the  
unemployment rate does not exceed 4%, it is considered low  
and is within the natural rate of unemployment and indicates  
a period of economic recovery.  
706  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
The degree of influence of all the above indicators on the  
state of the city’s sustainable development factors is  
described in Table 1 with a detailed gradation of each of the  
indicators and their weight. With the help of such gradation,  
it becomes possible to translate the qualitative factors of  
sustainable development of the territory into quantitative  
development of the city is appropriate since the proposed  
criterion allows for  
a
complete and comprehensive  
assessment of the state of the city and correct formulation of  
recommendations for the effective management of an urban  
municipality. In order to track the impact of production  
facilities on the city’s environment, to assess environmental  
indicators of the city’s territory adequately and in detail, an  
additional criterion should be introduced into the existing  
method of assessing sustainable development, the one that  
influences six major socio-economic factors. This factor is  
called the impact of industrial facilities on the environment  
(10).  
Significant environmental aspects (11) of the activities of  
enterprises are identified, realistic environmental policies are  
developed, environmental goals and objectives are  
determined, and necessary environmental protection  
measures are planned and implemented when assessing the  
environmental impact of the production facilities of the city.  
The identification of environmental aspects includes an  
assessment of the significance of the designated  
environmental aspects for the enterprise, determination of the  
individual sectors of the enterprise's environmental impact  
(measurable) indicators. Each indicator has its own weight  
and individual rating scale. Determining the value and  
choosing the appropriate weight on the scale of assessment  
are based on socio-economic and statistical research. This  
feature makes the method of assessment cost-effective and  
affordable, and the assessment of the state of factors of  
sustainable development is objective and eliminates the  
human factor. The gradation used for the assessment has clear  
boundaries and is suitable for any city. On the basis of this  
method for assessing the sustainable development of an urban  
municipality, cities of any country may be compared with one  
another, which makes this method of assessment universal.  
The aggregate weight of indicators of sustainable  
development factors should ideally be 1 (reference value),  
which means the maximum compliance of values and the  
sustainability of development of all factors (9) (Table 2). The  
method of assessing sustainable development by Bogomolova  
and Mashentsova covers the assessment of socio-economic  
aspects of sustainable development mainly, indirectly  
covering the environmental aspect through the influence of  
the environment on the average life expectancy of the city’s  
population. This method of assessing the actual  
environmental aspect is insufficient and cannot disclose the  
state of the environment, hydrosphere, biosphere or  
atmosphere more comprehensively. Adding an additional  
criterion to the main method of assessing the sustainable  
degree. The identified environmental aspects show  
a
significant environmental impact, which requires the  
immediate adoption of appropriate measures in order to  
reduce it or maintain it at an optimal level where the  
reduction is not possible. The importance of environmental  
aspects is determined by the following main factors: the  
degree of environmental impact, the state of the environment  
in the affected area, compliance with the requirements of  
established standards and current legislation, and the  
stakeholders’ priorities.  
Table 1: Indicators characterizing the level of the city's independence and influencing the state of the sustainable development factors  
Indicator Indicator weight  
Monofunctional  
No.  
1
0.03  
0.07  
0.15  
0.05  
0.1  
City functionality  
Mesofunctional  
Multifunctional  
0.15  
0.25  
Wages = from 1 [SM] to 2.9 [SM]  
Wages = from 3 [SM] to 4.9 [SM]  
2
Ratio of wages to the subsistence minimum  
Ratio of retail trade turnover to the subsistence minimum  
Average life expectancy  
Wages = 5 [SM] and more  
0.25  
Up to 100 [%]  
From 101 [%] to 200 [%]  
0.04  
0.09  
3
4
5
0.2  
0.2  
0.2  
Over 201 [%]  
0.2  
Up to 60 [years]  
From 61 to 70 [years]  
0.05  
0.12  
0.2  
Over 71 [years]  
Up to 10 [thousand people]  
From 10.1 to 70 [thousand people]  
0.2  
0.07  
Number of officially registered unemployed in Russian cities (per thousand  
people)  
Over 71 [thousand people]  
1
0.04  
Total  
Table 2: Interpretation of sustainable development factors  
Value  
Aggregate factor  
weight  
Presence of sustainable socio-economic and environmental development of the city. Characteristics of all five indicators  
show favorable conditions for life in the city. The cumulative weight of all indicators corresponds to the maximum value.  
The socio-economic and environmental development of the city is stable and uniform. The total weight of all indicators  
corresponds to the average value.  
A crisis of the socio-economic and environmental development of the city. All its main areas of life are in a critical condition  
and require fundamental changes. The cumulative weight of all indicators corresponds to the minimum value.  
>
0.9  
.5-0.9  
0.5  
0
<
707  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
An assessment method according to Markin et al. (10) is  
used in order to assess the impact of industrial facilities on  
the environment. The essence of this method is as follows:  
characterizes the amount (volume) of the environmental  
impact of harmful substances, S  features of the spread of  
the impact of harmful substances in the environment, I  the  
danger degree of the impact of harmful substances in the  
environment.  
Each impact factor is evaluated on a three-point scale,  
depending on the value of the specified parameters. The final  
score, which characterizes the rank of this impact factor, is  
obtained by multiplying the scoring values by three  
parameters. An increase in the result indicates an increase in  
the degree of impact of this factor on the environment.  
Scoring is dimensionless in its quality characteristics and  
does not reflect the value of any physical quantities. It only  
describes the scale of the problem being evaluated and the  
degree of importance of its solution.  
1
. In order to assess the impact of industrial facilities on  
the environment, firstly, the impact index should be found,  
that is, the assessment of the level of impact on the  
environment in points (Eq.1):  
II ASI  
,
(1)  
where A is an evaluation summary in points in terms of  
the amount of emissions of harmful substances into the  
environment, S is an evaluation summary in points for the  
spread of harmful substances in the environment, I is an  
evaluation summary in points by influencing factors (impact)  
of harmful substances on the environment.  
2
. The third stage of the environmental impact  
assessment of industrial facilities is the definition of scoring  
criteria. Based on the Russian and European experience in the  
field of environmental protection, criteria for determining  
points from one to three were developed for each of the three  
parameters of impact types. The development of the criteria is  
based on:  
The degree of environmental impact is  
a major  
importance factor of environmental aspects. Assessment of  
the impact of the enterprise on the environmental situation of  
the city includes determining the degree of impact,  
identifying the main impact factors and their quantitative  
characteristics. An enterprise may submit a consolidated list  
of environmental factors by the type of its activity, without  
any special research. In order to quantify the impact factors,  
instrumental measurements of exposure parameters are made  
-
the relation of the impact types to the established  
regulations, standards and permits;  
-
-
the impact spread nature: global, regional, local;  
the impact hazard degree is determined by the hazard  
(
concentrations of pollutants, emissions, wastewater, and  
class of pollutants, reversibility or irreversibility of impact.  
The convenience of an additional criterion is that the  
environmental impact of industrial facilities can be assessed  
using 12 indicators proposed by the authors. However, any  
indicators can be chosen for the city under assessment,  
depending on the uniqueness of the city and its features. The  
scoring criteria for assessing the environmental impact of  
production facilities on the environment are the following  
consumed resources) or calculation methods are used based  
on specific norms.  
The second stage of the environmental impact assessment  
of production facilities is the determination of the impact  
degree. In other words, it is the ranking, which determines the  
comparative "importance" of impact factors and priorities for  
solving the identified problems. A special methodology has  
been developed for the ranking of environmental aspects,  
taking into account the specifics of the enterprise. The  
methodology is based on the scoring method for assessment  
and development by the Danish company COWI. This  
method is simple and allows creating an acceptable general  
description of the company's impact on the environment, and,  
first of all, it is used to identify the priority areas of  
environmental activities in the enterprise. The degree of  
impact of each factor is determined by three parameters: A –  
(Tables 3-6):  
(
1) Air Emissions: This indicator is characterized by the  
features of spread and the danger level of emitted pollutants,  
the sum of annual emissions, which is formed during the  
operation of individual technological facilities (compressor  
and pumping stations, oil and gas pipelines, oil tank farms,  
production sites).  
Table 3: Scoring of pollutants emissions into the atmosphere by production facilities  
Criteria  
The amount of substances emitted exceeds 1,000 [tons per year]  
Parameter  
It is determined based on the volume of annual emissions and  
Score  
3
2
the nature of the pollution sources location. Due to the  
different potential for pollution of surface air with the same  
amount of emissions, different criteria are established for  
functional areas that include point or distributed emission  
sources  
The amount of substances emitted is 100-1,000 [tons per year]  
A
The amount of substances emitted is less than 100 [tons per year]  
1
The amount of substances emitted exceeds 2,000 [tons per year]  
The amount of substances emitted is 200-2,000 [tons per year]  
The amount of substances emitted is less than 200 [tons per year]  
Substances of hazard class 1 extremely dangerous, highly toxic  
Substances of hazard classes 2 and 3 high and moderately  
hazardous, methane  
3
2
1
3
Spread of emissions in the atmosphere is always 3 points since  
the air distribution is global  
S
I
The impact is determined by the danger level of the emitted  
substances  
2
1
Substances of hazard class 4 low hazard  
708  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
Table 4: Wastewater discharges scoring by production facilities  
Criteria  
Parameter  
Score  
The amount is determined depending on the volume of the The amount of substances discharged exceeds 10 [tons per year]  
annual wastewater discharge generated during the operation of The amount of substances discharged is 1-10 [tons per year]  
individual technological objects and the excess of this volume The amount of substances discharged is less than 1 [ton per  
3
2
A
S
I
1
3
over the established standard  
year]  
Discharge of polluted wastewater into surface water bodies and  
terrain without treatment  
Discharge of polluted wastewater into underground horizons,  
The spread depends on the degree of purification and the filtration fields, evaporation ponds, or into surface water bodies  
2
1
nature of the wastewater receiver  
after local treatment facilities in excess of established standards  
Drainage of wastewater to wastewater treatment plants of third-  
party organizations or discharge of treated wastewater into  
surface water bodies and underground horizons  
The impact is determined depending on the hazard class of the waste, same as for air emissions (see paragraph "1. Air emissions")  
Table 5: Scoring of disposal of waste that pollutes the environment by production facilities  
Parameter  
Criteria  
Score  
The weight of waste exceeds 100 [tons per year]  
The weight of waste is 10-100 [tons per year]  
The weight of waste is less than 10 [tons per year]  
Waste is stored at the enterprise for more than 3 years or is placed at  
unauthorized dumps  
Waste is disposed of at the plant or placed at licensed landfills  
Waste is stored at the enterprise for less than 3 years in accordance with the  
established requirements  
3
2
1
The amount is determined based on the volume  
A
S
I
(weight) of the annual waste production  
3
2
1
The spread depends on proper waste  
management  
The impact is determined depending on the hazard class of the waste, same as for air emissions (see paragraph "Air emissions")  
Table 6: Scoring of topsoil disturbance by production facilities  
Parameter  
Criteria  
The area of disturbed land exceeds 1 [hectare]  
The area of disturbed land ranges from 0.1 to 1 [ha]  
The area of disturbed land is less than 0.1 [ha]  
Removal of the whole soil profile  
Score  
3
The amount is determined depending on the area  
of disturbed land  
A
S
2
1
3
2
1
The spread depends on the impact depth.  
Removal of only the upper humus soil horizon  
Soil surface impact only  
The impact will lead to complete soil degradation and removal from crop  
The impact is determined by the possibility of rotation  
3
I
restoration (remediation) of the soil profile and Remediation is obstructed or can be done with deviations from norms,  
2
1
fertility  
leading to a decrease in soil fertility  
The impact is easily eliminated by remediation without reducing soil fertility  
(
2) Wastewater Discharges: Wastewater is determined by  
Mashentsova (5), this criterion, which influences the main  
factors of sustainable development, will allow examining the  
study object, adequately and effectively applying the program  
of management of the territory’s sustainable development, as  
well as provide with an opportunity to identify "weak" spots  
and effectively eliminate them.  
the nature of the output either to its own or to municipal  
wastewater treatment plants, transfer to other organizations,  
discharge to water bodies, ponds, evaporator plants or  
filtration fields. Wastewater is characterized by the sum of  
annual discharges, the content and the hazard class of  
pollutants. (3) Waste: The indicator is characterized by the  
assessment of waste types, the list of which is determined in  
accordance with the current classification. (4) Topsoil  
Disturbance. Assessment is carried out according to the  
following criteria.  
Using the above criteria, the environmental aspects of the  
enterprise’s activity are assessed for each type of impact. A  
general ranking list of the environmental aspects of an  
enterprise is compiled based on the results of this assessment.  
Thus, by supplementing the basic method for assessing  
sustainable development according to Bogomolova and  
3
Results and Discussion  
The development of Tyumen is happening at a significant  
pace, so it is extremely important to maintain a balance of all  
the aspects of sustainable development of this municipality.  
The choice of the city of Tyumen to assess sustainable  
development is due to the growth of industrial enterprises and  
their negative impact on the environment, as well as due to  
the impact of economic and environmental changes on the  
social sphere.  
709  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
In order to ensure the sustainable development of the  
economic, industrial, cultural, recreational and, consequently,  
ecological sphere of the city’s life, the following six main  
socio-economic categories are distinguished:  
that the city of Tyumen is actively developing its  
functionality, as evidenced by the main areas of the city’s  
activities. The greater the set of functions of a city, the higher  
its level of development, the more competitive the city is,  
both for the population and for the state as a whole. The  
second factor of the sustainable development of the urban  
municipality is the ratio of wages to the subsistence minimum  
of the city of Tyumen. In the city of Tyumen, the size of the  
subsistence minimum is established by a decree of the  
Government of the Tyumen Region (Table 7). In order to  
compare the subsistence minimum, five categories of  
activities in state and municipal property organizations were  
selected. The time interval considered was from the fourth  
quarter of 2014 to 2017, as long as a series of absolute values  
dynamics was taken for the ease of comparison (12).  
Based on Table 7, it can be concluded that the subsistence  
minimum of the presented categories of the population  
annually increases at different rates. Nevertheless, the  
increase in the subsistence minimum indicates inflation and  
the gradual fall of the ruble, and every year the population  
needs more and more money to ensure the normal  
functioning of the body and to maintain its health. In order to  
assess the quality of life of the population, its solvency and  
the amount of free cash per capita, the average wage over the  
2014-2017 period should be considered in absolute values  
(Table 8).  
-
-
-
-
-
-
territory management or administrative apparatus;  
economic state of the territory;  
state of the cultural sphere;  
pace of economic development;  
production sector;  
state of the social sphere.  
To ensure that these categories are not of a qualitative  
nature and that they can be adequately assessed, one should  
select five main measurable factors affecting those  
categories:  
-
-
-
city functionality;  
ratio of wages to the subsistence minimum;  
ratio of retail trade turnover to the subsistence  
minimum;  
-
-
average life expectancy;  
officially registered unemployed number per thousand  
people.  
For a more complete assessment and tracking of the  
sustainable development trend over time, a time series from  
014 to 2017 was selected for all the factors of sustainable  
2
development of the city of Tyumen. Thus, the first factor of  
the sustainable development of the urban municipality is the  
city functionality (Fig. 1). Based on Fig. 1, one can conclude  
Table 7: The size of the subsistence minimum for the period from the 4th quarter of 2014 to 2018  
Subsistence minimum, [rub.]  
Population category  
2
014  
2015  
2016  
2017  
Able-bodied population  
Pensioners  
8,942  
6,814  
8,559  
10,203  
7,777  
9,912  
10,378  
7,933  
10,031  
10,744  
8,193  
10,390  
Children  
Per capita  
8,470  
9,692  
9,855  
10,197  
Fig. 1: Analysis of the functionality of the city of Tyumen for 2014-2017 (compiled by the authors).  
710  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
According to Table 8, there is a tendency to an increase  
in wages of all categories of workers, which is caused by the  
increase in the subsistence minimum by the Government of  
the Tyumen Region, as well as by a gradual increase in prices  
for goods and services. Table 9 presents the ratio of the  
average wage (Table 8) and the subsistence minimum (Table  
ecological environment, a general conclusion about the  
sustainable development of the city of Tyumen can be made  
(Table 11).  
Thus,  
the  
socio-economic  
and  
environmental  
development of the city of Tyumen is stable and uniform.  
However, for the sustainable development of the city, the  
sum of all factors should be > 0.9. In the city of Tyumen, the  
sum of all factors is 0.72. This indicator falls within the  
boundaries of the total weight of factors from 0.5 to 0.9,  
which means that there are unrecognized errors in the  
development of the city. Perhaps there is a lack of resources  
in the budget for the implementation of programs in the field  
of the city’s sustainable development (16). In order for the  
city to have resource reserves that will lead to its  
development at the expense of its own potential and will  
reduce the influence of external factors on its operation, it is  
necessary to improve the indicators of sustainable  
development so that the total weight of sustainable  
development factors of Tyumen tends to 1.  
In the first part of the adapted method for assessing  
sustainable development, the city of Tyumen has already  
been assessed previously (Table 11). For the assessment of  
the second part of the method, namely, the assessment of the  
impact of industrial facilities on the environment of the city  
of Tyumen (Table 16), a time series from 2014 to 2016 was  
chosen.  
Thus, all the analyzed environmental aspects of Tyumen  
tend to decrease over the period in question. When ranking  
them by scoring each environmental factor based on the  
assigned points, it can be said that the total waste of  
enterprises, household garbage and harmful substances have  
the lowest degree of environmental impact. The impact index  
by 2016 was only 4 and 6 points, respectively. Greater impact  
on the environment was provided by wastewater discharges  
and soil cover changes due to urban planning; the impact  
index is 8 and 12 points, respectively.  
7
). Based on the Table 9 data, one can conclude that the  
wages of workers in the selected categories are greater than  
the subsistence minimum. The ratio of wages to the  
subsistence minimum indicates the quality of life of workers  
in different professions and specialties, their level of  
solvency, as well as the consumption of high-priced goods  
and services and luxury items. The third factor of the  
sustainable development of the urban municipality is the ratio  
of retail trade turnover to the subsistence minimum in the city  
of Tyumen. For the evaluation of the city by this factor, the  
period of the fourth quarter of 2014 to 2017 was taken in  
absolute terms. In order to determine the retail trade turnover  
relative to the subsistence minimum (Table 7), the  
subsistence minimum of the able-bodied population was  
taken on the basis of the availability of free money resources  
for this category of the population with the maximum  
replenishment of the consumer basket (13). The ratio of retail  
trade turnover to the subsistence minimum is presented in  
Table 10. The fourth factor of the sustainable development of  
the urban municipality is the average life expectancy of the  
population (14). For the analysis and assessment of this  
factor, a time series of 2014-2017 was taken (Table 10). The  
fifth factor of the sustainable development of the urban  
municipality is the officially registered number of  
unemployed per thousand people (Table 10). For the analysis  
of this factor, a group of persons in the age category from 15  
to 72 years was selected. For the analysis of this factor, the  
period from the fourth quarter of 2014 to 2017 was chosen in  
absolute terms (15).  
Summarizing all the indicators of the factors of socio-  
economic development of the city and the influence of  
Table 8: Average wage in the context of the activities of workers for the period from the 4th quarter of 2014 to 2017  
Average wage, [rub.]  
Professional field  
2
014  
2015  
2016  
2017  
Doctors and medical workers with higher education  
Research scientists  
Teachers of preschool educational institutions  
General education institutions teachers  
Teachers of HPE organizations  
Social workers  
51,509.7  
47,964.2  
40,077.0  
45,399.0  
48,383.8  
22,336.0  
51,876.7  
46,721.9  
39,348.1  
46,773.6  
49,129.9  
21,716.3  
52,629.0  
52,482.9  
39,382.7  
48,170.2  
55,098.8  
22,863.4  
57,308.0  
56,803.5  
40,215.6  
50,271.2  
66,761.0  
31,262.7  
Table 9: The ratio of the average wage in the context of the activities of workers and the subsistence minimum for the period of the 4th quarter of  
014 to 2017  
Ratio of wages to the subsistence minimum  
2
Professional field  
Factor weight  
2
014  
2015  
5.08  
4.58  
3.86  
4.58  
4.82  
2.13  
2016  
5.07  
5.06  
3.79  
4.64  
5.31  
2.20  
2017  
5.33  
5.29  
3.74  
4.68  
6.21  
2.91  
Doctors and medical workers with higher education  
Research staff  
Teachers of preschool educational institutions  
General education institutions teachers  
Teachers of HPE organizations  
Social workers  
5.76  
5.36  
4.48  
5.08  
5.41  
2.50  
0.25  
0.25  
0.1  
0.1  
0.25  
0.05  
711  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
Average weight factor  
0.1  
Table 10: Indicators of the city of Tyumen sustainable development factors  
Retail turnover for the period from the 4th quarter of 2014 to 2017  
Years  
Indicator  
2
014  
2015  
2016  
2017  
Retail trade turnover, thousand rubles  
474,951,416  
328,250,121  
360,200,778  
362,339,617  
Ratio of retail trade turnover to the subsistence minimum, [thousand rubles], for the period from the 4th quarter of 2014 to 2017  
Ratio of retail trade turnover to the subsistence minimum  
Factor weight  
Indicator average weight  
53,114.7  
0.2  
0.2  
32,171.9  
34,708.1  
33,724.8  
0.2  
Indicator optimal weight  
Unemployment rate of the city of Tyumen for the period from the 4th quarter of 2014 to 2017  
Unemployed  
38.3  
5.5  
43.2  
6.2  
40.2  
36.2  
4.8  
Unemployment rate  
Factor weight  
5.6  
0.07  
0.07  
0.07  
0.07  
0.07  
0.2  
Indicator average weight  
Indicator optimal weight  
Average life expectancy of the population of Tyumen for 2014-2017  
Average life expectancy  
70.3  
0.12  
71.4  
0.2  
72.1  
0.2  
72,7  
0,2  
Factor weight  
Indicator average weight  
0.2  
Indicator optimal weight  
0.2  
Table 11: Indicators of factors of socio-economic development that affect the level of independence of the city  
Factor  
weight  
0.15  
0.1  
0.2  
0.2  
No.  
Factor  
Factor characteristic  
1
2
3
4
5
City functionality  
Ratio of wages to the subsistence minimum  
Ratio of retail trade turnover to the subsistence minimum  
Average life expectancy  
Multifunctional  
Wages = from 3 [SM] to 4.9 [SM]  
Over 201[%]  
Over 71 [years]  
From 10.1 to 70 [thousand people]  
Officially registered number of unemployed in Russian cities (per thousand people)  
Total  
0.07  
0.72  
Thus, based on the data on industrial environmental  
impact factors, one can conclude that annually, starting in  
014, the level of air pollution in the Tyumen city by the  
indicators of its sustainable development factors (20). As a  
result, the city will receive even more autonomy in its  
development and become less susceptible to both internal and  
external destabilizing factors, which means the increase in its  
stability.  
2
industrial complex and the transport component of the city  
has been decreasing. The trend to reduce the impact of urban  
planning on topsoil and also to reduce discharges of  
wastewater polluting the water bodies of the city is observed.  
These improvements in the ecological sphere of the city  
along with stable socio-economic development are due to  
innovative activities in the field of environmental  
management, investments in funds aimed at protecting the  
environment and the rational use of natural resources (17,  
In order to manage the sustainable development of the  
city of Tyumen, a scenario approach was chosen, where  
recommendations for managing the sustainable development  
of the city, as well as the program for managing sustainable  
development, are presented for all three aspects at once (21).  
Modification of one aspect entails modification of the  
remaining aspects, and, as a result, a change in the system as  
a whole. Based on this causal relationship, it can be argued  
that the modification of all three aspects of sustainable  
development may entail a threefold modification of the  
system of sustainable city development, according to the  
synergy principle. In order to achieve sustainable  
development of the city of Tyumen and effective  
management of all three aspects, as well as to provide  
favorable conditions for life in the territory (22, 23), one  
should adhere to the program of measures to ensure  
sustainable development, which includes all management  
functions, namely planning, organization, motivation and  
control (Fig. 2). Planning, as a function of the city’s  
1
8). So, the study of environmental impact factors shows how  
important are the caring attitude to the ecology of the territory  
and smart nature management in the context of economic and  
social development (19). Impact factors clearly represent the  
very effect of the economic aspect on the environmental one,  
in particular, the impact of any production facility on the  
environment. This method of assessing the impact of  
industrial facilities on the environment is very important,  
since any new project of the city, or a new organization  
established by entrepreneurs, directly or indirectly concerns  
the ecology of the territory, and ecology, in turn, is an  
important factor in the social aspect of sustainable  
development. Based on the improved method of assessing the  
sustainable development of the city of Tyumen, it can be  
concluded that the social, economic and environmental  
aspects of the city’s sustainable development require  
effective modern management to achieve the highest  
sustainable  
development  
management,  
includes  
recommendations for improving the sustainable development  
of the city through the management of three aspects of  
sustainable development (Table 17). The recommendations  
are of a medium-term nature; therefore, the deadlines for their  
712  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
implementation are 3-5 years. Funds for the implementation  
of these recommendations for sustainable development can  
be allocated from the city budget, as well as through federal  
subsidies and by attracting foreign investment (24).  
By adhering to the program for sustainable development  
management, the city of Tyumen will be able to achieve high  
results in the field of such development: the successful  
application of the sustainable development concept within the  
city. The concept uses new energy sources, renewable  
resources, resource-saving technologies, cleaner production,  
ecological housing construction, organic farming, promotion  
of environmentally friendly products and goods, active use of  
"smart consumption" of resources, formation of the "green  
economy" structure of production and consumption (25, 26).  
Table 16: Assessment of the environmental impact of industrial facilities, 2014-2016  
Values  
2015  
Score*  
2015  
Parameters  
2
014  
2016  
2014  
2016  
Environmental impact parameters of harmful substances  
Impact amount  
Impact spread  
Impact (hazard class)  
Impact index  
3,000 [tons/year]  
3,000 [tons/year]  
1,500 [tons/year]  
1,500 [tons/year]  
3-4 class  
780 [tons/year]  
780 [tons/year]  
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
18  
18  
6
Environmental impact parameters of wastewater discharges  
16.5 [tons/year] 13 [tons/year] 10 [tons/year]  
Impact amount  
Impact spread  
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
Discharge of polluted wastewater in excess of established  
standards  
2-3 class  
Impact (hazard class)  
Impact index  
12  
Environmental impact parameters of total enterprise and household waste  
115 [tons/year] 95 [tons/year] 80 [tons/year]  
12  
8
Impact amount  
Impact spread  
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
Waste is stored at the enterprise for less than 3 years in  
accordance with the established requirements, is used at the  
enterprise or is transferred to other enterprises  
2-3-4 class  
Impact (hazard class)  
Impact index  
6
4
4
Parameters of the topsoil impact of town planning work and other activities  
Disturbed land area exceeds 1 hectare  
Impact amount  
Impact spread  
3
3
3
3
3
2
Removal of only  
Removal of the whole soil profile  
the upper humus  
soil horizon  
Remediation is  
obstructed or can  
be done with  
deviations from  
norms  
Impact (hazard class)  
Impact index  
The impact will lead to soil degradation  
3
3
2
18  
18  
12  
*
Evaluation is made on a three-point scale, where 1 is a low threat, 3 is a high threat.  
713  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
Fig. 2: Proposed measures to ensure the sustainable development of the city of Tyumen (compiled by the authors).  
Table 17: Recommendations for managing the sustainable development of the city of Tyumen  
Sustainable development  
Recommendations  
aspect  
-
withdrawing non-environmentally friendly products, technologies, and equipment from the  
competitive environment, investing in sectors of the economy involved in recycling, manufacturing  
products and providing services related to improving the environmental situation of the city, renewable  
resources, cleaner production, resource-saving technologies;  
-
development of environmental insurance and quotas trading in various areas of environmental  
management, licensing activities that affect the ecology of the territory. The introduction of fines and  
monetary compensation in favor of the administrative apparatus of the city for discharging harmful  
substances into the environment, for deforestation, the establishment of high barriers to opening and  
operation of enterprises that cause great harm to the environment;  
Economic  
-
effective control of the Tyumen region state program "Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex"  
for 2013-2020 by compulsory reporting on each of the activities, as well as the unification of  
documents for monitoring the status of activities. The priority is the active attraction of investments in  
Tyumen for the effectiveness of this program. It provides for the effective control of the following  
subprograms: development of agro-industrial production of the Tyumen Region in 2013-2020;  
development of agricultural land reclamation in the Tyumen Region for 2016-2020; sustainable rural  
development until 2020.  
-
ensuring the safety of the environmental component of the city and the environmental protection,  
subsidizing projects that involve recycling and production of recycled goods for subsequent use of such  
goods in everyday life or in the future production. The city authorities support the reconstruction of  
production facilities during the transition to low-waste and resource-saving technologies, the  
improvement of engineering, transport infrastructure, and the energy complex of the city using  
innovative solutions;  
Ecologic  
-
preservation of landscape and biological originality, increasing the stability of ecosystems,  
maintaining the purity of rivers, urban gardening and preserving the historical and cultural urban  
planning heritage;  
-
development of draft laws in the field of improving the state of the city’s ecology, introducing  
relevant regulatory indicators of the maximal permissive concentration of harmful substances taking the  
state of the city’s territory into account.  
-
development of legislative mechanisms to ensure that financial resources are consistent with the  
scope and terms of compulsory medical services for the population, ensuring public participation in  
health issues;  
Social  
-
improvement of the system of public territories, centers, and social infrastructure facilities,  
714  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
improvement of the spatial structure of the city territory, ecological housing construction,  
reconstruction and improvement of residential and industrial areas, implementation of tax and  
subsidized support for cooperative housing development;  
-
supporting global social projects within the city of Tyumen, increasing the level of social literacy in  
all aspects of sustainable development, the actual organization of educational process in educational  
institutions, in line with the latest achievements in culture, science, technology, and engineering, "smart  
consumption" of resources.  
Governance and Innovative Development of the Economy of the  
North: Science Journal of the Research Center of Corporate Law.  
Management and Venture Investment of Syktyvkar State  
University. 2014;3: 11-19.  
4
Conclusion  
Based on the improved method of assessing the  
sustainable development of the city of Tyumen, it can be  
concluded that the social, economic and environmental  
aspects of the sustainable development of the city require  
effective management to achieve the highest indicators of  
sustainable development factors. As a result, the city will  
become autonomous, less prone to both internal and external  
destabilizing factors. Recommendations on the city’s  
sustainable development management, as well as the  
sustainable development management program, should be  
made for all three aspects at once, because modification of all  
three aspects of sustainable development may entail a three-  
fold modification of the city’s sustainable development  
system. In order to apply the recommendations in the field of  
sustainable development of the city of Tyumen and achieve  
sustainable socio-economic and environmental development,  
the city’s administrative apparatus will need to set target  
implementation dates of 3-5 years and financial means to be  
received from the city budget, as well as from federal  
subsidies and attraction of foreign investments. In case of the  
optimal synthesis of these recommendations for the  
management of sustainable development of the city of  
Tyumen, it is possible to achieve high results in the  
management of all aspects of sustainable development and  
compete with cities of regional and federal importance in the  
considered indicators.  
1
1
1
0. Markin SV, Belousova EE, Lykov OP, Nedra AYu, Dedov AG.  
Determination of importance of ecological aspects of activity of  
production facilities of oil and gas complex. Chemical  
Technology. 2010;9: 568-575.  
1. Identification of environmental aspects: Improving the efficiency  
of the management system of OJSC Kamaz. Information on  
https://studwood.ru/531609/menedzhment/vyyavlenie_ekologich  
eskih_aspektov  
2. The size of the subsistence minimum: Tyumen region: the  
official portal of state authorities. Information on  
https://admtyumen.ru/ogv_ru/society/social_policy/life_level/mi  
nimum.htm  
13. Trade and services: Department of the Federal State Statistics  
Service in the Tyumen region. Information on  
http://tumstat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/tumstat/ru/stati  
stics/tumStat/enterprises/trade/  
4. The most frequent causes of death of residents of the Tyumen  
region: regional Internet portal "Nash Gorod". Information on  
http://www.nashgorod.ru/news/news96371.html  
1
15. Employment and unemployment in the Tyumen region in 2005-  
2017: Office of the Federal State Statistics Service in the  
Tyumen  
region.  
Information  
on  
http://tumstat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/tumstat/resourc  
es/023d1b00436a348a8c02cd74665da2b8/%D0%A0%D0%A1_  
%D0%A2%D0%9E.htm  
1
6. Kuklin AA, Naslunga KS. Methodological features of the  
assessment of the regional budget’s situation. Economy of  
Region. 2018;14(2): 395-407. DOI: 10.17059/2018-2-5.  
References  
17. Rudneva LN, Pchelintseva IG, Guryeva MA. The indicative  
system of assessing the level of ecologization in the context of  
the region’s sustainable development. International Journal of  
Economics and Financial Issues. 2016;6(S1): 227-232.  
18. Kurushina E. On regularities of economic dynamics in times of  
crisis. Canadian Journal of Science, Education and Culture.  
2014;2(6): 378-384.  
19. Doroshenko SV, Shelomentsev AG, Sirotkina NV, Khusainov  
BD. Paradoxes of the "natural resource curse" regional  
development in the post-soviet space. Economy of Region.  
2014;4(40): 81-93.  
1
.
Georgievich AE. Оutlines of the theory of urban agglomerations'  
self-development. Экономика региона. 2012;1.  
2
.
Tatarkin AI, Kuklin AA, Agarkov GA. Formation of an optimal  
set of measures to counteract the shadow economy on the basis  
of scenario analysis. Economy of Region. 2008;2(14): 9-22.  
Tatarkin AI, Animitsa EG. The formation of paradigmatic theory  
of regional economy. Economy of Region. 2012;3(31): 11-21.  
Tsapieva OK, Denevizyuk DA, Agaragimov MM. Integrated  
assessment of sustainable development of the city. Economy and  
management. 2007;20: 15-21.  
3
4
.
.
5
6
7
.
.
.
Bogomolova IV, Mashentsova LS. Method of assessment of  
factors ensuring sustainable development of large cities. Russian  
business. 2015;16(16): 2509-2520.  
Vazhenina TM. Economic Support of Sustainable Development  
of the Peripheral Municipal Formation. Industrial University of  
Tyumen. 2012.  
Gizatullin KhN, Samotaev AA, Doroshenko YuA. Integral  
characteristics of rating estimates of economic development of  
subjects of the Russian Federation. Economy of Region.  
20. Sudin KN, Mutovin SI. Tools for Sustainable Development of  
Northern Territories: Experience of Regional Studies. Siberian  
Federal University. Krasnoyarsk, 2014.  
21. Bolshakov BE. Science of Sustainable Development. Book I,  
RAEN, Moscow, 2011.  
22. Kiseleva LS, Strielkovski V. Economic analysis of happiness,  
wellbeing and health: a Tyumen Region case study. Actual  
Problems of Economy. 2014;161(11): 245-254.  
23. Kiseleva, L. Health as an economic resource in the context of  
contemporary theories, Czech Journal of Social Sciences.  
Business and Economics. 2013;2(3): 62-71.  
2
012;1(29): 195-203.  
8
9
.
.
Rudneva LN, Pchelintseva IG, Gureva MA, Simarova IS.  
Sustainable development and "green" economy: main concepts  
and approaches. International Journal of Applied Business and  
Economic Research. 2017;15(12): 23-33.  
Vazhenina TM. Methodology economic sustainability  
assessment of peripheral municipal formation, Corporate  
24. Zybatov VA, Vazhenina LV. Methodical approaches to the  
analysis and forecasting of development of fuel and energy  
complex in the region. Economy of Region. 2014;4(40): 188-  
199.  
715  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages: 075-0ꢀ6  
2
2
5. Gureva MA, Sheveleva NP. Mostovaya DA. Environmentally  
oriented innovations in the concept of green growth.  
International Scientific Research. 2016;1(26): 8-10.  
6. Vazhenina LV. Prospects of social and economic development  
of the Tyumen region (based on the creation of petrochemical  
industries). News from Higher Educational Institutions.  
Sociology. Economics. Politics. 2005;4: 65-80.  
716