Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 870-873
More relevant studies, in particular, a survey of student
youth in Simferopol conducted by A.V. Boiko in 2016,
only strengthen our assumptions. With 98% of respondents
who note their positive attitude to nature, more than half of
the respondents, experiencing a serious lack of information
motivation, do not take part in environmental practices (11-
respondents are sure that they personally can influence the
solution of environmental problems, while 39.7% believe
that not ordinary people are primarily responsible for the
quality of the environment, and city authorities.
This “shifting of responsibility” is reflected in
behavioral practices. The most common of them among
Tatarstan students are saving water and electricity (45.2%
and 38.7%). In general, Tatarstan students have more desire
to do something for the environment than real behavioral
attitudes. This is, in our opinion, due to the consumer
attitude to life and focus on individual economic goals.
Thus, the vast majority of informants motivate their
reluctance to participate in active practices by the lack of
time for them (“I don’t know whether I would like to enter
somewhere or not. I like the idea but I don’t know whether I
would find time for this or not”).
13, 17-20).
Turning to the results of the author’s study, first of all,
we note that the environmental awareness of the
respondents is characterized by average indicators. Despite
the fact that, according to respondents, 56.2% of them at
least once in their life searched for any kind of
environmental information on their own, they rate their
environmental awareness by 3 points out of 5 and get more
environmental information, they do not seek to increase it
(
42.7%). Informants of an informal interview characterize
their level of environmental awareness in the same way,
clarifying that they know little because they are only
interested in the environment in the framework of their
general development or in relation to their place of
residence (“Informing in our city is mediocre... and I know
the same. Although it is possible that people themselves do
not want to know. As for me, I would like to know more but
about Kazan and the Republic of Tatarstan particularly
rather that about the world or the country”).
4
Summary
The resource representation of nature was largely
reflected in the environmental consciousness of the student
youth of the Republic of Tatarstan, which became the
object of the author’s study. Environmental problems of the
republic are considered by students not so much dangerous
as annoying, although, in their opinion, they do not
interfere with
a
prosperous life. In this regard,
The subjective assessment of environmental awareness
of the interviewed Tatarstan students proportionally fully
coincides with the objective that we received from the test
results. The average assessment of their environmental
knowledge is 2 points out of 3 possible, which forms the
following hierarchy of values in which ecological well-
being takes 7th place (20.5%). First of all, respondents
worry about economic problems: low salaries and
scholarships (59.2%), unemployment (39.2%), increasing
prices (28%), economic crisis (23.7%), the crisis of
morality and culture (22.2%), and corruption (22%). This
situation can be explained by the immediate relation of
problems to Tatarstan students. In other words, they care
about what they themselves can and are afraid to face (“The
most important thing for me in life?.. Well-being. If there is
well-being, then you have a job, livelihoods, an opportunity
to develop. I want to be on to a good thing”). Such a
somewhat consumer attitude to life forms a corresponding
attitude towards nature, the level of concern about the state
of which is quite high (90.5%) and is expressed mainly by
concern about local environmental problems that concern
respondents directly. Among them are low quality of
drinking water (61.5%), air (58%) and water bodies
pollution (55.7%), landfills (34%), dirty streets, dilapidated
buildings (22.5%), decrease in area of green spaces
environmental assistance is perceived in most cases by an
altruistic action, which is disadvantageous in terms of time
costs. The results obtained in this part correlate with the
conclusions made earlier by Russian and foreign authors.
Following them, in the current situation, we assume a
significant role of the awareness on the nature of
environmental problems, on the nature and purpose of
everyday activities to help the environment, and,
accordingly, the factor of mass information on these issues.
The lack of environmental information entails the “failure”
of environmental communication - the reproduction of a
low level of involvement in environmental practices.
5
Conclusions
The environmental consciousness of modern youth is
highly controversial, which is a consequence of the
failure” of environmental communication. Young people
“
are informed about the nature of relationship of human and
nature, about its high value and the need for directed
environmental activity of every citizen to maintain the state
of the environment. Along with this, in relation to the
current state of ecology, the severity, diversity and
consequences of environmental problems, there is a
significant information gap. As a result, the value attitude
to the nature of youth includes a deep respect for it and the
(
22.2%), non-natural food products (21%).
illusion of
a harmonious, almost harmless mutual
The study participants noted a real environmental
neighborhood, the nature of which can change, however, in
the long term only. The model of environmental behavior
laid down by this form of consciousness is based on passive
actions of both ends of the spectrum, excluding any active
activity. Thus, the use of nature that is active and carries a
clear threat is condemned, but its passive forms do not
cause such a strong negative reaction. At the same time,
passive forms of environmental activity are common that
make up the practice of self-preserving behavior, while
degradation and expressed their concern about this (76.7%).
Despite this, in general, the students surveyed highly rate
the degree of favorable environmental conditions in their
place of residence (73.5%) and feel protected from
environmental risks (46%). Along with this, it is necessary
to solve environmental problems, and 66.2% of respondents
and about half of interviewers express their desire to
contribute to their solution. At the same time, a slightly
smaller share positively assesses their strengths - 53.2% of
872