Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 939-943
Each of these aspects involves its own tools and methods,
and, above all, proper analysis conduct. So, potential
counterparties are subject to a more thorough analysis for
their degree of solvency and the assessment of transaction
effectiveness, taking into account the form of payment,
possible risks and additional costs associated with the
conclusion of contracts (6, 11, 12). Regarding regular
customers, the structural analysis is carried out according to
several criteria: the timing of occurrence and repayment,
according to the degree of the counterparty importance for
the enterprise (ABC analysis), according to the established
amounts of a commodity loan. Thus, a company receives not
only a complete picture of the current and possibly future
state of receivables, but also the ability to predict the receipt
of funds, taking into account a pre-developed settlement
procedure for the future period and possible amounts of bad
receivables.
The most effective mechanisms for receivable
optimization are factoring, offsetting mutual claims and their
restructuring. It is advisable to select and apply them on the
basis of a counterparty credit rating compilation, which
allows ranking debtors not only by the degree of their
solvency and timeliness of their obligation fulfilling, but also
by the needs of an enterprise in cash resources at a particular
time moment. In other words, a credit rating is necessary for
a company from the perspective of the temporary aspect of
cash inflows. So, if debt restructuring is applied to problem
debtors, the factoring scheme can be applied both to bona
fide buyers and customers, and in relation to overdue debts.
The option of mutual claim offsetting is possible if a
company has, first of all, mutual obligations and, secondly,
the goals of the company pursues in this case: priority of
repayment of receivables or payables.
relates to the problem of receivables. The fact is that drawing
up an additional agreement to the principal debt and setting a
schedule for paying off overdue debts will allow a company
to receive, albeit by installments, but still a positive cash
flow. At the same time, several options are possible, starting
from mitigating the penalty conditions specified in the main
contract, ending with a flexible schedule for main debt
repayment.
Considering a restructuring option, it must be borne in
mind that the real value of cash received will differ from the
nominal value of the debt by a discount coefficient that
reflects the level of the inflation component. Offsetting
mutual claims is also an interesting financial tool for large
corporations with extensive cooperative ties, assuming the
existence of mutual obligations between its counterparties (8,
10, 14). In these conditions, the management of such
enterprises can solve the problems arising with the repayment
of debts through their mutual offsets. Mutual liabilities are
selected by counterparties, maturity and amount of debt, as
well as their degree of content uniformity. The significance
of this debt repayment mechanism is the simultaneous write-
off of obligations. At that, there is no real cash flow.
3
Results and Discussion
The theoretical aspects of accounts receivable
optimization through factoring and debt restructuring, are
considered in the second part of the article, provide specific
calculations for one of the leading Russian enterprises
"KAMAZ" PJSC. The structural analysis of accounts
receivable for three reporting periods (2016 - 2018) showed
the growing dynamics of this indicator, and its growth was
significantly faster than revenue growth. In the structure of
total receivables, customer and buyer liabilities decreased
from 58% to 43%. Over the same period, advance payments
have grown significantly (by 12.8%). During consideration of
receivable optimization approach application feasibility in
terms of cash receipts, the obligations of suppliers and
contractors should not be taken into account. As for short-
term liabilities, loans and borrowings increased from 9% to
Let's consider the appropriateness of the abovementioned
method application to optimize receivables.
The goal of a factoring transaction for an enterprise is the
speed of receipt of funds from the sale of relatively liquid
receivables (7, 13,15,16,17). Its use is conditioned by several
reasons. The first is the degree and frequency of the need for
cash resources at any given point of time. The second reason
is the problem of external financing source attraction. The
price of a factoring transaction will depend on the degree of
the receivable liquidity and its maturity, the interest rate of
the bank loan provided by the factoring company and the
commission of the factoring company (2, 9,20).
21%, and accounts payable decreased from 27% to 19% in
general sources of financing over the same period. In general,
the total amount of current liabilities of "KAMAZ" PJSC
exceeds the amount of receivables excluding advance
payments to suppliers and contractors by 2.4 times. Hence
the relevance of timely payments by debtors.
The feasibility of a factoring agreement conclusion for
the sale of receivables is conditioned, first of all, by the real
possibility of a faster receipt of funds, since such a
transaction may take place before the receivable maturity. If
overdue debt falls into a factoring transaction, then in this
case an enterprise removes the problem of its collection. In
any case, the factoring scheme is the receipt of funds with a
certain discount. In addition, timely factoring is the most
important factor to accelerate the turnover of receivables.
Thus, choosing the feasibility of a factoring scheme
The effectiveness of the factoring transaction for
KAMAZ" PJSC can be shown by the example of other
receivables, the share of which in total liabilities was 38%
15,443.4 million rubles) in 2018. So, if 5% of this amount
or 772.2 million rubles) were spent through factoring
"
(
(
operations, then the positive flow of a company could make
02.3 million rubles under the most severe conditions of the
6
transaction (with the discount of 22%). Thus, "KAMAZ"
PJSC would have reduced the amount of receivables by 772.2
million rubles. At that, cash received in the amount of 602.3
million rubles could be sent towards paying off accounts
payable, in particular, on tax liabilities, which amounted to
application,
a company proceeds from its monetary
component. Its effectiveness will be determined by the
relevance of timely fulfillment of obligations of an enterprise:
the payment of suppliers' bills, tax obligations, loan
servicing. The restructuring of liabilities, as was noted above,
1
,405.7 million rubles in 2018. In addition, as the result of
this scheme, the speed of circulation of receivables would be
9
40