Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1141-1145  
J. Environ. Treat. Tech.  
ISSN: 2309-1185  
Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com  
Safety Practices among Fisher Folks in Antique:  
Basis for Extension Activity  
Peter Ralph B. Galicia  
University of Antique, Sibalom, Antique, Philippines  
Received: 05/08/2019  
Accepted: 20/11/2019  
Published: 20/12/2019  
Abstract  
This descriptive-correlational study aimed at ascertaining the safety practices among fisher folks as basis for extension activity.  
Utilized for data gathering was researcher-constructed questionnaire on safety practices. The computer-processed statistics were  
means, frequency, and rank for descriptive analysis and the t-test for Independent Samples, One-way ANOVA and Stepwise  
Multiple Regression Analysis for inferential analysis. Alpha level was set at .05. The study found out that generally, fisher folks’  
common safety practices were less. The fisher folks in Antique had shared five common safety practices: they check weather  
condition at all times, they put in heart and mind that “Safety First” is the utmost priority onboard, they check the condition of all  
equipment and machinery before use, they maintain healthy body while fishing, and they get information about changes in the sea  
condition. On the other hand, they also shared five least common safety practices: they maintain working condition of fire  
extinguisher and fire detection alarm, they trained to operate safety equipment and appliances, they join fire drills weekly, they join  
awareness program about safe navigation, and they use lifejacket when jumping into the water. No significant difference existed  
in the common safety practices among fisher folks when classified according to certain categories of variables. None of the personal  
factors could significantly predict the common safety practices among fisher folks.  
Keywords: Fishing Industry, Safety, Practices, Fisher folks, Antique  
1
BFAR has filed 863 cases against fishing operators as of July  
1
Introduction  
2016 to June 2017. Through the concerted efforts of the  
Shipping has a major role in transporting cargoes all over  
bureau, 238 cases have been rectified (14).  
Thus, the researcher found it relevant to determine the  
safety practices among fisher-folks in Antique as basis for  
extension activity.  
the world and perhaps one of the most dangerous modes of  
transporting passengers and cargoes. The best way of  
improving safety at sea is by developing international  
regulations to be followed by all shipping nations (1-13, 16)  
Safety of life at sea (SOLAS) is one of the main concerns  
of International Maritime Organization (IMO), a specialized  
agency created by United Nations (UN). Many regulations  
and conventions have been adopted to improve operational  
safety conditions. The Philippine, as member country of  
IMO that belongs to the “white list”, is expected to adhere to  
the regulations imposed by the agency (16).  
2 Theoretical Framework of the Study  
This research is anchored on Risk Homoeostasis Theory  
by Wilde which proposes that in every activity, people  
accept a level of individual evaluation of risk in terms of  
their overall safety to enable them to avoid accidents that  
usually occur at sea due to lack of safety practices. People  
tend to ignore risk when the level of risk is below the  
acceptable limit and eventually increase their exposure to  
risk. But, when people observe a higher risk, they exercise  
precautionary measures to avoid exposure on risk. Thus,  
people usually do not respond for their own good but they  
manage to respond on more rules, policies, regulations, and  
new procedures imposed to them by authorities.  
Philippine registered vessels below 35 Gross Tonnage  
(
GT) are expected to strictly follow the policies and  
regulations imposed by the government. Small-scale  
fisherfolks engaged on fishing activity are prone to accidents  
and emergency at sea. Thus, they must be equipped with  
sufficient trainings on safety to further enhance their safety  
awareness and practices onboard vessels (18).  
The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR)  
Regional Office 6 has filed the most number of cases on  
illegal, unreported, unregulated fishing in the country (8).  
Thus, there is a need of an approach to save them from  
injuries in times of work. The safety practices may determine  
an effective implementation of safety environment at sea.  
Corresponding author: Peter Ralph B. Galicia, University  
of Antique, Sibalom, Antique, Philippines. Email:  
antique_1985@yahoo.com.ph.  
1141  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1141-1145  
All items in the instrument had factor loads of .941 for  
common safety practices, under the valid constructs intended  
for the study. The instrument consisted of two parts: Part I  
elicited information on the fisherfolks’ age, years in school,  
years of work experience, and training attended. Part II  
elicited data on the fisherfolks’ common safety practices.  
4
.4 Procedure  
The researcher requested permission to administer the  
research instrument from the office of Municipality Mayor  
of Hamtic, Antique, known as fishing village in the area.  
Upon approval of the permit, meticulous oral instructions  
both in English and Tagalog were given to make certain that  
the participants accomplished the questionnaires properly.  
Figure 1: Illustrates in graphic form the paradigm of this research  
3
Objectives of the Study  
The objective of this study was to ascertain the common  
4.5 Data Analysis  
The accomplished questionnaires were scored and  
subjected to appropriate computer-processed statistics using  
the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)  
software version 23. Means, frequency, and rank were the  
descriptive statistical tools employed in the study. t-test,  
One-Way ANOVA, and the Stepwise Multiple Regression  
Analysis set at .05 alpha level were the inferential tools used.  
safety practices among fisherfolks in Antique. Also, to  
determine the significant difference in the common safety  
practices among fisherfolks in Antique when classified as to  
categories. Further, to determine the personal factors that  
best predict safety practices. Furthermore, to formulate an  
extension activity that will improve the safety practices of  
fisherfolks in Antique.  
5
Results and Discussion  
4
Methodology  
5.1 Ranks on the Common Safety Practices among Fisher  
folks  
4
.1 Research Design  
The descriptive method of research was employed in this  
Table 1 presents the fisherfolks’ common safety practices.  
The results revealed that the top five highest means on the  
fisherfolks common safety practices were: they check  
weather condition at all times (M = 3.82), rank 1.5; they put  
in heart and mind that “Safety First” is the utmost priority  
onboard (M = 3.82), rank 1.5; they check the condition of  
investigation since the data were collected to answer  
questions concerning the common safety practices among  
fisherfolks in Antique. Descriptive research, according to  
Gay, et al., involves collecting data in order to answer  
questions concerning the common safety practices among  
fisherfolks in Antique. A descriptive research, Gay, et al.  
add, determines and reports the way things are (15).  
all equipment and machinery before use  
3; they maintain healthy body while fishing (M = 3.68), rank  
.5; and they get information about changes in the sea  
(M = 3.80), rank  
4
condition (M = 3.68), rank 4.5. This means that fisherfolks’  
religiously comply with local government regulations,  
practice safety by heart, maintain the condition of all  
equipment, maintain healthy lifestyle, and ensure safe  
navigation.  
However, the following were least ranked on the  
fisherfolks’ common safety practices: they maintain  
working condition of fire extinguisher and fire detection  
alarm (M = 1.26), rank 21; they were trained to operate  
safety equipment and appliances (M = 1.25), rank 22; they  
join fire drills weekly (M = 1.24), rank 23; they join  
awareness program about safe navigation (M = 1.21), rank  
4
.2 Participants  
The participants in this study were the 322 randomly  
selected fisherfolks in Hamtic, Antique, known as fishing  
village in the area, from a total registered fisherfolk  
population of 1, 671 retrieved from the Municipal Fisherfolk  
Registration System (FishR) Database of Bureau of  
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) Region 6 as of  
year 2018 (8). Simple Random Sampling Technique was  
used to select the specified number of respondents in  
Hamtic, Antique, known as fishing village in the area.  
4.3 Instrument  
24; and they use lifejacket when jumping into the water (M  
The data needed for the present research were drawn from  
a questionnaire-checklist on the common safety practices  
among fisherfolks constructed by the researcher and duly  
validated by a jury composed of five members. This  
instrument was constructed on the basis of the four  
prescribed modules in Modified Basic Safety Training  
Course (MBSTC), namely: Elementary First Aid, Personal  
Survival Technique, Fire Prevention and Fire Fighting, and  
Personal Safety and Social Responsibility which was  
developed by the MARINA for the IMO basic safety training  
course for seafarers’ onboard ship below 35 gross tonnage  
= 1.20), rank 25. This means that fisherfolks are deficient on  
safety equipment and appliances onboard, have no  
information regarding the operation of safety equipment and  
appliances, lack practice on fire drills, rarely conduct safety  
awareness program, and lack life-saving appliances  
available on boat.  
5.2 Difference in the Fisher folks’ Common Safety  
Practices  
Table 2 presents the difference in the fisherfolks’ common  
safety practices when classified according to years in school,  
years in work, and training attended. The results reveal that  
(
17).  
1142  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1141-1145  
no significant difference existed in the fisherfolks’ common  
safety practices when classified according to years in school  
t(320) = 1.023, years in work experience t(320) = .702, and  
training attended t(320) = .245, p > .05. These results imply  
that regardless of personal factors, fisherfolks have the same  
common safety practices. This result affirmed the findings  
of Ansuya, et al. that selected demographic variables have  
no influence on common practices on safety measures (3).  
difference existed in the fisher folks common practices on  
safety measures when classified according to age F(2,319) =  
.229, p > .05. This result suggests that the seafarers,  
regardless of age, have similar common practices.  
Table 3: One Way ANOVA Results in the Differences in  
the Fisherfolks’ Common Safety Practices When Classified  
According to Age  
Table 1: Ranks on the Common Safety Practices among  
Fisher folks  
5
.4 Predictors of the Fisherfolks’ Common Safety  
Practices  
Data in Table 4 reveal that of the four identified personal  
factors, age, years in school, years in work experience, and  
training attended are not significant predictors of the  
fisherfolks’ common safety practices (F = .139, 1.046, .492,  
and .060, respectively, p > .05). These results imply that  
none of the personal factors may affect the manifested  
common safety practices among fisherfolks.  
Table 4: Predictors of the Fisherfolks’ Common Safety  
Practices  
On the other hand, this finding is contrary to the result of  
Rodriquez & Kiran’s study which revealed that significant  
difference existed in respondents’ practice on safety  
measures when classified according to income of fishermen  
and source of information (19).  
5
.5 Proposed Extension Activity  
Kaligtasan ng mga Mangingisda”: Extension  
Activity  
Table 2: T-test Results for Difference in the Fisherfolks’  
This is a proposed extension activity of the  
Common Safety Practices  
University of Antique  College of Maritime Studies  
to address the problems of the fisherfolks in the  
Province of Antique when it comes to safety, which is  
a contributing factor on their fishing activity at sea.  
The results of the study revealed that no significant  
difference existed in the common practices on safety  
measures among fisherfolks. Hence, the results of the  
study will serve as basis in the formulation and  
defining objectives and strategies, program priority of  
this extension activity to meet the needs of the fishing  
industry, and align with development priorities and  
commitments of the Philippine government.  
5
.3 Difference in the Fisher folks’ Common Safety Practice  
When Classified According to Age  
Table 3 presents the difference in the fisher folks’  
common practices on safety measures when classified  
according to age. The results show that no significant  
In the next five years, from 2019 to 2023, the  
extension activity will achieve the specific objective  
by improving the overall safety practices among  
fisherfolks in the Province of Antique.  
1143  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1141-1145  
The extension activity aims to promote the overall  
safety; improve the safety practices; improve the  
financial stability and human capital; improve the  
health and wellness; and improve the livelihood  
endeavors among fisherfolks in the Province of  
Antique.  
United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)  
2030, Philippine Transport Plan and Strategy, and  
Comprehensive National Fisheries Industry Development  
Plan (CNFIDP) 2016  2020.  
References  
1
.
Aberoumand A. Nutritional Properties of Some Novel Selected  
Fish Species in Khuzestan Province, Iran. Journal of Food  
Technology Research, 2014;1(1):52-59.  
Table 5: presents proposed extension activity  
2
.
Agaton, C. Coal, Renewable, or Nuclear? A Real Options  
Approach  
to  
Energy  
Investments  
in  
the  
Philippines. International Journal of Sustainable Energy and  
Environmental Research, 2017;6(2):50-62.  
3
4
.
.
Ansuya, Navaneetha M., Nanda Kumar P. Occupational health  
problems and job satisfaction among fishermen. Nightingale  
nursing time, 2010;6(5):49-51.  
Anya MI. Ozung PO, Okah U, Ayuk AA, Igwe PA. Blood  
Profile of West African Dwarf (WAD) Goats Fed Cassava Peel  
Meal Based-Diets Supplemented with African Yambean  
Concentrate. Canadian Journal of Agriculture and Crops,  
2
018;3(2):55-63.  
5
6
7
.
.
.
Baykan ZK, Ozcan M. Growth and Survival Parameters and  
Blood IgG and Total Protein Levels of Calves Born in the First  
Production Year of Brown Swiss and Simmental Cows. Animal  
Review, 2017;4(2):35-44.  
Bhuyan MS, Rashed-Un-Nabi M, Hoque M, Sharif ASM, Islam  
M. Monitoring of Surface Soil Quality Parameters of the  
Sitalakshya River, Bangladesh. Review of Environment and  
Earth Sciences, 2018;5(2):42-54.  
Brahim A, Douka C, Azang SPE, Ningatoloum C, Belinga  
RB, Ankemekom FG, Fohouo FNT. Foraging Activity of Apis  
mellifera L.(Hymenoptera: Apidae) on Corn Panicles at  
Yaoundé, Cameroon. Canadian Journal of Agriculture and  
Crops, 2018;3(2):64-71.  
Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources. Philippine fisheries  
profile, 2014.  
Chang Y, Kim G. Forecasting Waste Agricultural Plastics  
Generation in the Republic of Korea and its Policy  
Implications. Agriculture and Food Sciences Research,  
2018;5(2):68-72.  
6
Conclusions  
The fisherfolks in Antique believe that they have shared  
five common safety practices: they check weather condition  
at all times, they put in heart and mind that “Safety First” is  
the utmost priority onboard, they check the condition of all  
equipment and machinery before use, they maintain healthy  
body while fishing, and they get information about changes  
in the sea condition. On the other hand, they also shared five  
least common safety practices: they maintain working  
condition of fire extinguisher and fire detection alarm, they  
trained to operate safety equipment and appliances, they join  
fire drills weekly, they join awareness program about safe  
navigation, and they use lifejacket when jumping into the  
water. They share similar common safety practices in terms  
of personal factors such as age, years in school, years in work  
experiences, and training attended. None of the fisherfolks’  
personal factors can predict their common safety practices  
that may affect their manifested common safety practices.  
The researcher proposed an extension activity titled,  
8
.
9
.
10. Chaturvedi A. Storage Stability of Intermediate Moisture  
Cauliflower Brassica Oleracea, Var, Botrytis Cabbage Brassica  
Oleracea, Var, Capitata Using Radiation as Hurdle Technology.  
Journal of Food Technology Research, 2014;1(1):60-72.  
1
1. Clausen E. Probable Deep Erosion by Continental Ice Sheet  
Melt Water Floods: Chalk Buttes Area of Carter County,  
Montana, USA. International Journal of Geography and  
Geology, 2018;7(1):14-26.  
12. Dike E, Dike N. Did Global Warming and Climate Change  
Cause the Degradation of Lake Chad, Africa's Most  
Important'EcologicalCatastrophe'?. Review of Environment and  
Earth Sciences, 2018;5(2):15-41.  
Kaligtasan ng mga Mangingisda” to further improve the  
1
3. El-Gali ZI. Evaluation of Some Plant Extracts and Powders in  
Control of Bean Damping-Off By Sclerotinia  
safety practices of fisherfolks in Antique.  
Sclerotiorum. Agriculture and Food Sciences Research,  
2018;5(1):47-51.  
14. French LA. BFAR6 filed most number of illegal fishing cases.  
7
Recommendations  
It is recommended that the concerned agencies should  
coordinate with the fisherfolks to ensure their safety and  
build resiliency, sustainable development in fishing  
community. Also, concerned agencies should provide up-to-  
date safety information accessible to all fisherfolks. Further,  
concerned agencies should provide safety related trainings  
that improve their safety practices. Futhermore, concerned  
agencies should help the fisherfolks in providing safety  
equipment that will enhance their safety practices during  
fishing activities. These recommendations are aligned with  
the national and international policies on PDP 2017-2022,  
1
5. Gay LR, Mills GE. Airasian PW. Educational research:  
Competencies for analysis and applications (with MyLab  
th  
Education). 9 edition. 2018.  
1
6. International Maritime Organization, Fishing vessel safety.  
17. MARINA. Philippine fishing vessels safety rules and  
regulations. Philippines: Maritime Industry Authority, 2018.  
1144  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1141-1145  
1
8. MARINA Circular No. 2010  02 (2010). Rules in the issuance  
of a seafarer’s identification book (SIB) for seafarers onboard  
Philippine-registered vessels below 35 GT. Philippines:  
1
9. Rodrigues DE, Kiran U. A pilot study on knowledge & practice  
regarding prevention of occupational hazards and attitude  
towards utilisation of safety measures among fishermen  
working at a selected harbor. K. Pandyarajah Ballal College of  
Nursing, Someshwar Road, Mangalore - 575 021. E-mail:  
deves7@rediffmail.com. Nitte University Journal of Health  
Science. NUJHS, 2013;3(3). ISSN 2249-7110.  
1145