Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2020, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages: 310-313
2
.3 Experimental Design
Ten grams of triplicate samples plantain peels were
after the unripe peel treatment levels of copper in the effluent
significantly (<0.05) reduced to 1.27 mg/l, 1.18 mg/l, 1.04
mg/l, and 0.83 mg/l in weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively (Table
2).
weighed using weighing balance and distinctly macerated in
Litres of the collected effluent sample. The results were
4
monitored for the aforementioned parameters weekly for a
period of one month.
Mercury was not detected in the effluent before and after
treatment (Table 2). The bioassay for lead indicated that the
levels of lead before treatment were 1.71 mg/l in week 1,
1.38 mg/l in week 2, 1.18 mg/l in week 3 and 1.11 mg/l in
week 4 (Table 2). Treatment with unripe peels showed that
the lead levels were significantly (p<0.05) reduced to 1.11
mg/l in week 1, 1.04 mg/l in week 2, 1.01 mg/l in week 3 and
0.87 mg/l in week 4 (Table 2).
Results on iron levels showed that before treatment iron
level was 15.44 mg/l in week 1, 11.44 mg/l in week 2, 10.81
mg/l in week 3 and 10.08 mg/l in week 4 (Table 2). After
treatment with the unripe peels, levels of iron reduced
significantly to 8.98 mg/l in week 1, 6.96 mg/l in week 2,
2
.4 Statistical analysis
All emerging data were subjected to statistical analysis
using Version 20 of SPSS, One Way Analysis of variance
ANOVA) was utilized for mean separation, while Duncan
(
multiple range statistic was used to establish the significance
of the observed differences at P=0.05.
3
Results and Discussion
Results of the physicochemical quality of the effluent
before and after treatment are presented in Table 1. Before
treatment, results on pH level from weeks 1 - 4 was; 4.22
1.32 mg/l in week 3, and 1.55 mg/l in week 4 (Table 2).
Furthermore, the bioassay treatment with ripe peels was
most active in reducing iron levels to 0.96 mg/l in week 1,
(
week 1), 4.66 (week 2), 4.70 (week 3), and 4.77 in week 4.
The treatment with the unripe plantain peel demonstrated
significant (P<0.05) improvement in pH level in week 1
0.59 mg/l in week 2, 0.39 mg/l in week 3, and 0.36 mg/l in
week 4. In summary, it was observed that treatment
improved water quality with respect to the analysed
parameters as the weeks progressed. However, it was
observed that the ripe plantain peels treatment was more
effective than the unripe plantain peels treatment.
Effective treatment of polluted water samples with parts
of plantain have been documented in literature in a previous
study. Acidic and high iron containing water was treated
with the leaves, stem and trunk of plantain by Ohimain et al.,
(
5.24), week 2 (5.73), week 3 (6.48) and week 4 (6.57).
Furthermore, the ripe peel bioassay was the most effective
treatment which improved the pH levels of 5.93, 5.94, 6.58
and 6.80 in weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively (Table 1).
The Dissolved oxygen level of the effluent before
treatment was reported as 3.07 mg/l in week 1, 3.57 mg/l in
week 2, 3.59 in week 3 and 3.97 mg/l in week 4. After
treatment with the unripe plantain peels, DO level of the
effluent improved significantly (p<0.05) to 4.10 mg/l in
week 1, 4.31 mg/l in week 2, 4.42 mg/l in week 3 and 4.88
mg/l in week 4. The unripe plantain peel was the most
effective with improved DO levels to 4.40 mg/l in week 1,
[
10]. After 4 weeks of treatment, acidic pH levels reduced
from 4.15 mg/l – 6.48 mg/l for leaf treatment, 4.15 mg/l –
.85 mg/l for bract treatment, and 4.15 mg/l – 7.88 mg/l, for
6
the leaves treatment. In the same study effective iron
treatment was reported for the leaves (8.62 mg/l – 1.05 mg/l),
bracts (8.62 mg/l – 2.12 mg/l), and trunk (8.62 mg/l – 0.11
mg/l).
In another study, the unripe peels of plantain were
reported to have reduced iron concentration from 11.44 mg/l
to 9.98mg/l in week 1, 7.96mg/l in week 2, 4.92mg/l in week
4.54 mg/l in week 2, 4.59 mg/l in week 3, and 4.96 mg/l in
week 4 (Table 1).
The Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of the effluent
before treatment was 1.44 mg/l, 1.44 mg/l, 1.44 mg/l and
2
.11 mg/l in weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. However,
treatment with unripe plantain peels showed improvement to
.10 mg/l (week 1), 4.31 mg/l (week 2), 4.42 mg/l (week 3),
4
3, and 1.55mg/l in week 4 [11]. For the ripe plantain peel
and 4.88 mg/l in week 4. Furthermore, the unripe plantain
peel treatment had more efficacy with BOD levels of 1.38
mg/l in week 1, 1.53 mg/l in week 2, 2.21 mg/l in week 3 and
treatment results were reported as; 7.96 mg/l (week 1), 6.39
mg/l (week 2), 3.08 mg/l in week 3, and 0.86 mg/l in week 4
[11]. In the same study, they reported that the pH treatment
2.42 mg/l in week 4.
for unripe peels was; 5.34 in week 1, 5.83 in week 2, 6.34 in
week 3, and 6.56 in week 4. Meanwhile, the ripe peel was
Prior to the biotreatment the concentrations of chemical
oxygen demand of the effluent was 2.22 mg/l in week 1, 2.62
mg/l in week 2, 2.64 mg/l in week 3 and 2.69 mg/l in week
5
4
.53 in week 1, 5.59 week 2, 6.55 in week 3 and 6.70 in week
. The mechanism of treatment is yet to be unravelled.
4. Treatment with the unripe plantain peels improved COD
Although biosorption by the plant and presence of
phytochemicals are suspected mechanism.
levels to 2.31 mg/l in week 1, 2.54 mg/l in week 2, 2.55 mg/l
in week 3 and 2.75 mg/l in week 4. There was more
improvement in the COD level of the effluent when unripe
peel was applied with values of 2.59 mg/l in week 1, 2.75
mg/l in week 2, 3.33 mg/l in week 3 and 3.58 mg/l in week
3
Conclusions
The persistent and anthropogenic discharged of point-
4
(Table 1).
sourced untreated effluent into aquatic ecosystem is a
regrettable and unfortunate action. In this research treatment
was applied to point source effluent using unripe and ripe
peels of plantain. Fortunately, the biotreatment of the water
with ripe and unripe plantain peels resulted to significant
(p<0.05), improvement of all physicochemical properties
assessed. Similarly, the treatemts were able to reduce heavy
metal concentration significantly (p<0.05). based on the
The result of heavy metal concentrations before and after
treatment is presented in Table 2. Prior to treatment, the level
of cadmium was below detection limit and remained so after
the applied treatments were concluded (Table 2). Results on
the levels of copper before treatment were 1.84, 1.68, 1.46
and 1.44 mg/l in weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. However,
312