Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 766-769
The efficacy of the process was evaluated through a period of
steady state operation ensuring high degree of wastewater
stabilization defined by extent of chemical oxygen demand
effluent samples for the acetogenic reactor were sent for Furrier
Transformation Inferred Spectrophotometric analysis (FT-IR).
5
(COD), bio chemical oxygen demand (BOD ), and color removal.
The overall objective was to develop an energy efficient
alternative to the conventional treatment process used for textile
wastewater treatment that also does not require any chemicals for
operation. This process will go a long way to make the textile
processing more sustainable.
2
Materials and Methods
Raw wastewater: The test wastewater was collected from the
wastewater equalization basin of one of the largest towel
manufacturer in the world, Talha Terry Towel, in Gazipur,
Bangladesh. The wastewater was a time proportioned sample
collected over twenty-four hour of operation of the wastewater
treatment plant.
Seed: Both the acetogenic and aerobic polishing rector was
seed with waste mixed liquid suspended solids from the
wastewater treatment plant sludge thickener of the Talha Terry
Towel.
Figure 2: Acetogenic aerobic wastewater treatment used at the bench
level
Specific oxygen consumption (SOUR): The oxygen utilization
rate (OUR) was measured at day twenty by transferrin the aerobic
culture to two 100 ml beakers. One reactor was fed 10 ml
untreated textile wastewater and the other reactor was fed 10 ml
of acetogenic reactor effluent. The surface of the liquid volume
was covered with plastic foil to prevent oxygen transfer and the
reactor dissolved oxygen was measured real time to determine the
oxygen consumption for an hour to determine the OUR. The
Specific oxygen consumption for both the wastewater were then
determined by dividing the OUR by the reactor MLSS.
Reactor Configuration: In the bench scale react setup the
textile wastewater was fed directly to the acetogenic reactor
where acetogenic microorganisms prevailed. The acetogenic
reactor has a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of four days with
only a periodic shock aeration once per day instead of continuous
aeration to maintain acetogenic operation. The acetogenic reactor
effluent was sent to a clarifier where the acetogenic biomass was
recycled back to the acetogenic reactor periodically to prevent
reactor washout. The effluent from the clarifier was polished in a
continuously aerated aerobic reactor operated in a sequential
batch mode with the effluent passed through a membrane
ensuring that the mixed liquor is kept in the reactor. The treated
effluent was analyzed on a daily basis for water quality
parameters.
Anaerobic acetogenic reactor: The bench scale reactor was a
glass vessel with a liquid volume of 1.0 L. The reactor content
was completely mixed (Figure 2). The reactor was maintained at
a (HRT) of 4.0 days. Every day 250 ml was wasted and 250 ml of
the wastewater was fed to the reactor. The short HRT reflects an
operation condition known as washout mode of operation that is
the food to microorganism ration (F/M) increases with every day
of operation. To further prevent methanogenic microorganisms
from growing in the reactor in a daily basis, the reactor content is
purged with air and raise the dissolved oxygen level in the reactor
to 2.0 mg/L (3) (4) (5). Based on our prior experience in operating
anaerobic acetogenic reactor that F/M ratio of greater than 1.0
causes reactor failure (6). To negate this the reactor waste MLSS
recycled back to the acetogenic reactor periodically. The reactor
pH, temperature and MLSS were monitored on a daily basis.
Aerobic Membrane Batch Reactor: The aerobic batch reactor
had a liquid volume of 500 ml and was maintained in a waste feed
mode on a daily basis (50 ml waste/feed volume). The reactor was
continually aerated. The reactor effluent was passed through a
membrane to separate the liquid from the biomass. The MLSS
was not wasted for the duration of the testing program.
3
Results and Discussions
In line with biological treatment process to treat wastewater
from industries this experimental program looked at textile
processing wastewater treatment possibility using biological
acetogenic process (6, 10, 11). The composite wastewater
characteristic used in the study was a complex wastewater with
5
high BOD (3500 ± 114 mg/L), COD (5186 ± 138 mg/L), and
color (3540 ± 353 ptco). The BOD/COD ratio of 0.67 makes the
wastewater a good candidate for biological treatment and served
as the challenge wastewater for the combined acetogenic aerobic
polishing treatment process. The total dissolved solids and the
total suspended solids of the test wastewater were 1963 ± 10 mg/L
and 1783 ± 619 mg/L on an individual basis. The pH of he
wastewater was 9.6 ± 0.26.
The picture contrasting the color removal between the
influent untreated wastewater and the treated water along with the
5
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD ) and the chemical oxygen
demand (COD) removal trends for the combined process are
shown in Figure 3a-c. From the onset the combined acetogenic
aerobic process was able to treat the wastewater to a high degree
of efficiency. Over the period of 20 days of operation the system
consistently achieved complete removal of color as shown by the
picture contrasting the influent blue color and clear treated water
5
and greater than 95% removal efficiency of BOD , and COD for
the twenty days of operation. Also the system did not require any
period of acclimation prior to achieve the high degree of waste
stabilization observed. The reason may be that the seed source
was from the same wastewater treatment plant where the test
wastewater was from and the culture is already acclimated to the
wastewater. The microorganism present had the ability to produce
Analysis: The composite wastewater was analysed for COD,
BOD
centrifuged and the supernatant was saved on a daily basis and
analysed for COD, BOD , and color for all days of operation as
per standard methods (7). For spaced days of operation saved
5
, color, and TDS. The aerobic reactor effluent was
5
7
67