Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 779-786
initiatives to be taken depends on the needs of the business
and its people. The change or transformation can occur in the
HRM structure, HRM strategy, and HRM systems and
processes, when the HRM practices are redesigned to better
reflect internal or external requirements (4) of the business.
In this regard, in defining how HRM practices are done and
delivered within an organization, it is important to
understand the nature of the HRM change that contributes to
organisational performance and effectiveness. In fact,
knowing the distinction between change and transformation
can be essential to an organization’s success and possibly its
survival (5). Ulrich and Brockbank (6) distinguished
between a transformed HRM function versus HRM change.
Rothwell (7) defined HRM transformation “as the process of
fundamentally re-thinking and re-chartering the HRM
function or department in an organization”. HRM change
and HRM transformation are not the same; the former refers
to a fundamental reconstruction of the HRM function, i.e.,
changing something that already exists, whereas the latter
concentrates on discovering new things. For example, Ulrich
and Brockbank (6) explicitly explained, if HRM function has
moved to a new service delivery mechanism of having
service centres, centres of expertise or outsourcing and yet
still delivering the same old HRM services, the function has
changed, but not transformed. Likewise, changing any single
HRM practices such as recruitment, training, and
to create the capability, capacity, and organisational culture
needed to not only go through current market volatility, but
also create the foundation for continued profitability. With
multi-generational workforce with different expectations,
talent would want to work in an environment where they can
do their best work and make a valuable impact. According
to Dery and McCormick (13), considerable changes have
taken place from the year 2006 onwards in how work is
performed. There is a rise in the use of technology such as
smartphones, cloud services, virtual networks, and web-
based services; and these technologies are increasingly
becoming mainstream, according to a report released by
Capgemini (14). The impact of the rapid digital growth has
meant that organizations have had to adapt to new market
expectations. In the context of banking institutions, banks
have responded by establishing digital business strategies to
digitise the bank’s operations and products offerings based
on customers’ needs.
The field of HRM is growing and is expected to continue
as an area of theorising, empirical, and methodological
development. Therefore, in response to changing business
demands and the evolving role of HRM, the objective of this
study is to explore the way the HRM function of a banking
institution changes or transforms in response to the increased
competition for digitised banking transformation and what
this means in terms of managing human capital requirements
for sustainable workplace environment of the future. The
main reason behind selection of looking into banking sector
is that the future competitiveness and growth of the sector
have more potentiality in increasing employment and
improving the Malaysian economy. Based on the research
purpose and current understanding, the following research
questions are formulated for this study to understand
changes to the HRM of a banking institution:
performance management does not lead to
a real
transformation. However, the entire array of the HRM
structure change and practices collectively adds value for
key stakeholders, without any transformation occurrence (8).
The concept of HRM transformation goes even further
when it is further supported by other HRM literature. It is
considered as transformative HRM practices when HRM
functions embed analytical and sophisticated systems of
thinking in order to create the kinds of understanding that
drive better workforce strategies and workplace outcomes
for the organization (9,10). HRM transformation must
change both HRM behaviour and work outputs in such a way
that the changes add value for key stakeholders. Whereas,
changing one aspect of the HRM practices makes it better,
but it does not link it to value-adding agendas. For example,
changes and improvements in the customer connections,
individual abilities, or organization capabilities are
constituted as just HRM change.
1) How do the external and internal factors affect the
HRM function’s need for change?
2) How is HRM in a banking institution undergoing the
change process to be sustainable for the future?
The rest of this paper is organised as follows: Section 2
describes the research method with the qualitative data
analysis and findings. Section 3 presents and elaborates the
findings. Section 4 provides a discussion on findings.
Finally, Section 5 concludes the whole paper.
Accordingly,
for organizational
and business
2
Methodology
sustainability, HRM function must engage with the new
rules of business sustainability and align its organizational
activities in view of that (11,12). It is not just making money
and ethical business decisions. Research has shown that by
investing in employee-based initiatives such as conducive
working environment, an inclusive culture, green initiatives
promoting environmental efficiencies in the workplace,
talent development, beyond the minimum requirements of
employment law, a business can reap the benefits of
improved employee motivation and productivity, while
contributing to a healthier society (3). Given the landmark
Given the limited existing research on HRM changes
happening in the Malaysian banking sector, an exploratory
and inductive approach was adopted. It involved a series of
in-depth interviews with a range of HR professionals in one
of the leading local banking institutions in the capital city of
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. The study focuses on the chosen
Banking group’s transformation journey in digitizing the
bank completely and how the HRM division aligns its
functions with delivering value and impact to the Group.
2
.2 Participants
In-depth interviews were conducted with four business
change occurring in financial services industries,
a
progressive and forward-thinking HRM function is critical
to ensuring organizations’ ability for a smooth transition into
the digital age. Organizations need their HR leaders to help
lead the process of internal business transformation in order
leaders, seven HR professionals from the Group Human
Resource (GHR) division and three from the high potential
talents, identified by the key HR contact in GHR who
facilitated the overall research access into the banking
7
80