Improvement of the Master's Training in the University in the Context of Educational Standards of the New Generation

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 750-755

J. Environ. Treat. Tech.

ISSN: 2309-1185

Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com

Improvement of the Master's Training in the

University in the Context of Educational Standards

of the New Generation

Anastasia V. Stafeeva , Nikolay B. Vorobyov , Svetlana S. Ivanova , Maxim A. Balakin ,

Irina Y. Burkhanova , Mariyash E. Akmambetova , Elena A. Saveleva-Rath

Department of Physical Education Theoretical Foundations, Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Department of Vocational Education and Management of Educational Systems, Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University,

Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Department of Pedagogy and Continuing Professional Education, Astrakhan State University, Astrakhan, Russia

Department of Children 's Camps, Federal State Budget Educational Institution "International Child Center "Artek", Yalta, Russia

Received: 18/12/2019

Accepted: 19/03/2020

Published: 20/02/2020

Abstract

The topic of the investigation is considered relevant due to the fact that at the moment in the higher education establishments of the

Russian Federation the federal educational standard of a new generation (three plus plus) has commenced in many majors. This standard

implies the formation of general professional and universal competencies among university graduates. Professional competencies can

be established as compulsory or recommended by the main educational program. In this regard, the theoretical necessity and practical

development of the content of educational programs, which will include not only general professional competencies, but also professional

ones, which will solve the tasks of developing the skills required by a professional standard by type of activity, is an urgent need. The

goal is to develop new approaches, forms and criteria for assessing professional competency (PC-1) formulated in the main educational

master degree program in the major 44.04.01 Pedagogical education, “Educational technologies in the field of physical education”. The

leading method of research on this topic is the analysis of existing approaches to the implementation of the FSES (Federal State

Educational Standard, 2018) three plus plus, the development of the content of the discipline "Modern educational technologies in the

physical education of children and adults", as well as the criteria for assessing professional competencies in the process of studying the

discipline in the master's program. The article discusses examples of a project assignment and contextual task for master degree students,

the implementation of which determines the degree of formation of skills to implement modern educational technologies of PE for

teaching and development of children and adults engaged in educational activities, to analyze the process of their effectiveness using

modern science methods, as well as information and innovative technologies. Materials can be applied to improve the quality of PE

teachers training on the level of Master`s program and organize the control and evaluation activities of future teachers in order to

objectively evaluate the achieved learning outcomes.

Keywords: Teacher, Master's program, Educational standard, Basic educational program, Professional competencies, Forms for

assessing learning outcomes

Introduction

¹Master's training in the Russian Federation is one of the

Currently, pedagogical universities are implementing the

third generation standard, the so-called standard “three two

plus”. This standard focuses educational institutions on the

formation of three types of competencies: universal, general

professional and professional. Moreover, the first two types of

competencies are proposed by the standard as compulsory.

Professional competencies established by the educational

program are formed on the basis of professional standards that

correspond to the professional activities of students and can be

formulated by the educational institution on their own. These

professional competencies can be established as compulsory or

recommended by the main educational program [8, 9]. Thus,

the urgent need is the theoretical justification and practical

development of the content of educational programs, which

will include not only general professional competencies, but

also professional ones, which will help to solve the problems of

stages in the implementation of basic professional educational

programs in the multi-level structure of higher education. The

integration of Russian higher education in the European space

also affects the requirements for graduate students [1, 2, 3].

“The master must be able to consciously apply the acquired

knowledge in solving new non-standard problems, have the

ability to solve problems with incomplete or limited

information, communicative and organizational and

managerial skills, be prepared for a systematic independent

development and increase the level of education. For the

successful implementation of the tasks set, it is necessary to

build a flexible and dynamic system of master training, capable

of transformation, which is based on principles that promote the

development of competitive highly qualified personnel” [4, 5,

, 7].

Corresponding author: Anastasia V. Stafeeva, Department of Physical Education Theoretical Foundations, Kozma Minin Nizhny

Novgorod State Pedagogical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia. E-mail: staffanastasiya@yandex.ru.

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 750-755

developing skills required by a professional standard by type of

activity [10, 11, 12].

main goal of the module is to prepare masters in the field of

physical education to implement the design of educational

space and manage it, as well as to manage the process of self-

development as an individual and professional. These factors

are considered to provide a social, personal and professional

readiness to increase professional, pedagogical and managerial

skills [19-22]. During the implementation of this module,

students receive basic competencies in the field of

organizational, managerial, design and reflective and

evaluative activities that provide the optimal level of readiness

for building a career in the field of physical education and

sports [23-26].

The main target group is made up of bachelors and

specialists in the field of PE who are professionally focused on

realizing their potential in the field of physical education and

sports (future physical education teachers, trainers and teachers

in additional educational institutions, instructors in fitness

centers, etc.).

Methodological Framework

The methodological basis for conducting research aimed at

developing new approaches to improving the training of master

students in teachers training was the activity approach, which

laid the foundation for the design of the FSES, which focuses

on the inclusion of students in the activity, thereby making it

possible to describe the results of educational and cognitive

activities of students using educational results [13-15].

From the standpoint of the Professional Standard of the

teacher and in the logic of the activity approach, the structure

of educational results can be described on the basis of the

following components: knowledge needed to perform actions;

actions; skills as a personal characteristic of mastery of actions.

This means that in order to assess the degree of formation of

competencies among graduates of a certain major, taking into

account the Professional Standard, it is necessary to decompose

the competencies at the level of PPEP (Principle Professional

Educational Program), putting each set of educational results in

accordance with each competency [16–18].

The curriculum of the discipline "Modern educational

technologies in the physical education of children and adults"

is oriented to full-time master degree students of the program:

4.04.01- Pedagogical education, major "Educational

technologies in the field of physical education." In the structure

of the module, the discipline "Modern educational technologies

in the physical education of children and adults" is compulsory.

In the course of studying the discipline, students master

theoretical and practical material on the design of modern

technologies for the physical education of children and adults.

The discipline aims at creating the conditions for the

formation of competencies among master degree students

necessary for further education in the field of physical

education and sports.

By educational results, we mean the student's activity

indicators presented in the form of a description of their

identifiable actions. The formulating of these indicators, as O.I.

Rebrin points out, should reflect what "the student needs to

know, understand and / or be able to demonstrate at the end of

the learning process or part of it." This procedure allows the

selection of academic disciplines, to fill them with content and

to determine the objects of assessment by discipline (module)

in the form of sets of educational results.

To create the competency of PC-1 in the framework of the

study of the discipline, educational competencies were

formulated on the basis of the following labor activities

presented in the professional standard "Teacher":

Results and Discussion

At Minin University Principle Professional Educational

Program 04.04.01 Pedagogical education, major “Educational

technologies in the field of physical education” is currently

implementing. The goal of the Principle Professional

Educational Program (PPEP) is the development of students'

personal qualities and the formation of universal, general

professional and professional competencies in accordance with

the Federal State Educational Standard [12] of Higher

Education in 04.04.01 - Pedagogical education (master degree).

The main types of professional activity in this program are

pedagogical, organizational, managerial and research activities.

In developing the curriculum for the implementation of the

PPEP (Principle Professional Educational Program), in

accordance with FSES (Federal State Educational Standard of

Higher Education) 3 ++, the following professional standards

were analyzed and selected for the formation of compulsory

professional competencies: professional standard “Teacher”,

professional standard “Teacher of professional training and

further professional education”. As a result of this analysis and

the correlation of types of professional activity, the professional

competency PC-1 was formulated - “To be able to justify and

implement modern physical education teaching technologies

for teaching and developing children and adults, to analyze the

process of their effective use in educational establishments”.

To build competency PC-1, the module "Management

Technologies in Physical Culture and Sports Organizations" in

the amount of 27 credits is provided by the curriculum. The

A / 01.6.1 Development and implementation of

curriculum programs within the framework of the basic general

educational program

A / 03.6.3 The use of tools and diagnostics and

assessment of indicators of the level and dynamics of child

development (professional standard “Teacher of Additional

Education” A / 01.6. Labor function: Organization of students'

activities aimed at developing an additional general educational

program).

The Indicators of Competencies Achievement and Labor

Actions (ICA) were also pointed out:

PC-1.1. To operate methods of designing, implementing

and determining the effectiveness of modern physical

education teaching technologies for teaching and developing

children and adults.

PC-1.2. To implement modern physical education teaching

technologies for training and development of children and

adults engaged in educational activities, analyzes the process of

their effectiveness using modern methods of science, as well as

information and innovative technologies. Table 1 and 2

presents the content of the discipline with the decomposition of

the competencies of the PC 1.1. and PC 1.2. on the sections of

the program and relevant assessment tools to assess their

formation.

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 750-755

Table 1: The content and forms of assessing the formation of the Indicators of Competencies Achievement of the discipline

Modern educational technology in the physical education of children and adults"

Competencies decomposition Unit (topic) Assessme Grade

ICA

Criteria

code

nt tools

point

(% accomplishment)

II semester

PC-1.1

Knows: modern concepts of Unit 1. Modern concepts of Report

physical education of students in physical education.

Russia and abroad;

7-10

Completeness

Can: use the methods of

designing, implementing and

determining the effectiveness of

Accuracy

Topic 1.1. Concepts of

modern

teaching

educating

physical

technologies

and

education

for

developing

Project

12-18

7-12

physical education abroad.

Topic 1.2. Models of

physical education in Russia.

Unit 2. Modern technologies

of physical education in

educational establishment.

Topic 2.1. Technology of

children and adults.

Accuracy

Context

task

physical

training

secondary school.

Completeness

accuracy

and

Topic 2.2. Technology for

the development of planning

documents for educational

material on the subject

Project

assignmen

12-18

Accuracy

“

Physical Education” within

-12

the framework of the Federal

State Educational Standard

Context

task

Total PC-1.1

45-70

Table 2: The content and forms of assessing the formation of the ICA of the discipline "Modern educational technology in the

physical education of children and adults"

Can

PC-1.2.

Develop and implement modern Unit 3. Modern technologies of Report

physical education teaching physical education of youth and

technologies for training and adults.

7-10

Completene

development of children and Topic.3.1.

adults engaged in educational technologies

activities, analyze the process of education of students.

their effectiveness using modern Topic 3.2. Fitness technologies

methods of science, as well as for adults.

Modern

physical Project

12-18

14-24

Completene

assignment

Accuracy

information

technologies.

Total PC-1.2

and

innovative

Creative task

45-70

Thus, to assess the degree of formation of the indicator PC

.1 the following forms of assessment were used: report,

and criteria for their assessment, which would allow us to

assess the degree of formation of knowledge and skills of

master students in the study of discipline "Modern educational

technology in the physical education of children and adults."

For example, imagine 2 forms for assessing the ICA - 1

competency PC-1, such as the project assignment and context

task.

The project assignment contains the following content:

“Develop a technology (model) of physical education in an

educational establishment using one of the models of physical

education”. To complete the task, an instruction was developed:

“The project assignment is carried out by each student. In a

project it is necessary to give arguments for the choice of

approach (concept) for the development of technology (model)

of physical education in an educational establishment.

Formulate the goal, objectives, expected results of the project.

Develop the content of the model in accordance with the chosen

approach. Identify development prospects, educational effects,

pedagogical risks. Draw conclusions. Project protection is

project assignment, context task. These forms make it possible

for students to evaluate the knowledge of modern concepts of

physical education of students in Russia and abroad, as well as

some skills in using the methods of designing, implementing

and determining the effectiveness of modern physical

education teaching technologies for training and developing

children and adults. Table 2 presents the content of the

discipline with the decomposition of the competencies of PC

.2. According to the sections of the program and the

corresponding assessment tools to assess their formation.

Based on the statute on midterm assessment of Minin

University, the levels of formation of professional competence

PС-1 were developed. Based on the situation, the master

student can receive 70 points during the semester, according to

the results of completed tasks on the ICA - 1 from 25 to 42

points in the first semester and ICA - 2 in the second semester

(

table 3) .The greatest difficulty is the development of forms

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 750-755

carried out in the form of a public presentation at the lesson, as

part of a contact independent work or in an electronic

educational environment. Also, criteria and a rating scale for

the project, where the maximum mark for a project assignment,

according to the discipline rating, is 18 points, and the

minimum mark is 12 points (table 4) were developed. The

content of the context task “Development of physical training

in a secondary school” was developed on the topic of the

discipline “Technology of physical training in a secondary

school” and is formulated as follows: “One of the primary tasks

of physical education lessons at school is to achieve the proper

level of development of endurance, as the most important

physical quality that affects the indicators of the functional

capabilities of the body of schoolchildren, and thereby

contributes to the preservation and strengthening of health. The

problem of planning the endurance physical quality in the

process of physical education of schoolchildren is due to the

difficulty in achieving a cumulative effect, a small arsenal of

adequate methods for developing endurance, as well as

difficulties in assessing the level of development of this quality

depending on the age and physical characteristics of the

students. In this regard, the problem arises of developing a

technology for the development of physical qualities for

endurance training for students of various age groups. Choose

one age group (7-11 years old, 12-15 years old, 16-17 years old)

as agreed with the teacher and for the selected age group,

complete the following tasks." After reviewing the content,

master students need to complete the following tasks: 1.

Develop a training program for 1 month (mesocycle) to educate

the various types of endurance that you detcided for this age

group. Justify the selected tools and methods. Plan your classes

at least 3 times a week (the duration of the lesson (or part of the

lesson aimed at developing endurance) is from 20-30 minutes).

of endurance with the procedure and units, justify their choice.

Tests must meet the requirements of information content and

reliability. Table 5 presents the assessment scale for the context

task, where the maximum score for the case is 15 points, the

minimum score is 12 points.

. Conclusion

To sum up, the need to build the ability of teachers to

complete the labor functions presented by the professional

standard of a teacher and additional education teacher for

master degree students require the formation of professional

competencies developed by the educational establishment itself

and which are compulsory for the educational programs of

higher education establishments in the educational program

“Pedagogical Education”.

Formation of the competency PC - 1 - “Able to justify and

implement modern physical education teaching technologies

for training and developing children and adults, to analyze the

process of their effective use in organizations engaged in

educational activities” within the discipline of the educational

program “Pedagogical education” with the major “Educational

technologies in the field of physical training” will contribute to

the formation of skills in the practical implementation of the

basic theoretical and methodological principles in professional

activities, use the psychophysiological, sociopsychological and

biomedical laws of the development of physical abilities and

motor skills of students, the principles and methods of physical

education for various contingents involved in the learning

process, as well as generate knowledge on the use of modern

educational technologies for various contingents of students,

projecting skills, implement and determine the effectiveness of

modern physical education teaching technologies and

development of children and adults.

. Describe the means, methods and select the load for each

training day. Select control exercises (tests) to assess the level

Table 3: Levels of competency formation PC-1 and labor activities A / 01.6.1, A / 03.6.3

Code

PC-1

ICA

decomposition

I semester

PC-1.1.

Credit test

II semester

PC-1.2

Grades

Levels of competency formation

Ideal

Satisfying

Critical

Not satisfying

Less 25

45-70

10-30

42-46

33-41

25-32

45-70

10-30

42-46

25-32

Less 25

Exam

Table 4: Criteria and scale for the evaluation of the project.

Criterion of the project assessment / Indicators

Grade points

. The methodological apparatus of project activities possession, 0 – 6

) The relevance of the project idea substantiation

) correct formulation of goals, objectives and expected project results

) the content of the project idea corresponds to the problematic of the task

. The quality of the content of the project task, 0 – 8

0 – 2

) a technology for the development of physical qualities for the academic year was developed in accordance with 0 –2

the physical education program implemented in the educational establishment

) means of physical education selected in the technology and the load are adequate to the age characteristics of 0 –2

the contingent

) work load regulation during the academic year meets the specific principles of physical education 0 – 2

) the methods used to assess physical qualities are informative and correspond to the age characteristics of the 0 – 2

contingent

. The quality of the presentation of the project assignment products (presentations, handouts, photo-video reporting), 0-4

) compliance of the presented materials content with the topic, type and content of the project

) originality and presentability of positioned products of activity

0 – 1

0 - 1

) conciseness and maximum information content of the text in the slide

) presentation material: fluency in the content, communication with the audience

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 750-755

Table 5: Criteria, levels and scale assessment.

Assessment criteria

Markers

Grade

.The degree of the task

The correct and complete answer to each task is received.

The correct answer to one question is received.

Only scattered answers to questions are given.

accomplishment

The arguments are logically structured, the statements are justified with the help

of existing knowledge in the field of professional activity.

.Answer validity

There are mistakes in the logic of constructing arguments, statements are either

not sufficiently substantiated with the help of existing knowledge in the field of

professional activity, or some of the arguments given and their justifications do not

correspond to the tasks.

Misunderstanding of the professional situation, professional knowledge in the

field of professional activity corresponding to the tasks has not been demonstrated.

The assessing forms for professional competence

developed and presented in the article will allow you to assess

objectively the degree of formation of this competency in

students studying for master's degree in the course of studying

the discipline "Modern educational technologies in the physical

education of children and adults", students of the educational

program 04.04.01 Pedagogical education, in the basic

curriculum module "Management Technologies in Physical

Education and Sports Organizations".

Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology.2018;

(22):213-216.

7] Fedorov AA, Paputkova GA, Samerkhanova EK, Filchenkova IF,

Demidova NN. Projecting a new design of the educational

ecosystem of the university in the context of the modernization of

national education. Psychological Science and Education, 23(1),

[

2–63. 2018.

[8] Ivanova SS, Bystritskaya EV, Burkhanova IY, Stafeeva AV,

Vorobyov NB, Dreiko NY, Bobyleva LA. Rhizome model of

formation of the need for the self-realization of a future physical

education teacher. International Journal of Applied Exercise

Physiology.2019;8(2):21-36.

9] Perevoshchikova EN, Lekomtseva AA. Designing a case study as

an evaluation tool. Modern problems of science and

education.2016;3. URL: http://www.scienceeducation.ru/en/ar-

ticle/view?id=24851.

[10]Professional standard. Teacher (Pedagogical activity in preschool,

primary general, basic general, secondary general education).

Approved by order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection

of the Russian Federation of October 18, 2013 N 44n. Moscow:

Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation.

Recommendations

[

When developing the content of the main professional

educational programs in accordance with Federal State

Educational Standard three plus plus of the educational prigram

4.04.01 Pedagogical education, it is necessary to take into

account the requirements of professional standards for the type

of activity. Professional competencies can be established as

coppulsory or recommended by the main educational program.

It is recommended to analyze and select the following

professional standards for the formation of compulsory

professional competencies: professional standard “Teacher”,

professional standard “Teacher of professional training and

further professional education”. As a result of such an analysis

and the correlation of types of professional activity, to

formulate professional competencies that allow to form

professional skills that correspond to the main types of

activities indicated in the Principle Professional Educational

Program and labor activities presented in professional

standards.

013.

[

11]Professional standard. "The teacher of professional training and

additional professional education" Approved by order of the

Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation

of 08.09.2015 N 608n. Moscow: Ministry of Labor and Social

Protection of the Russian Federation. 2015.

[12]Federal State Educational Standard. Federal State Educational

Standard for Higher Education in the educational program

4.04.01 Pedagogical education, approved by order of the Ministry

of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of 02.22.2018,

No. 126. Moscow: Education and Science of the Russian

Federation. 2018.

[

13]Perevoshchikova EN, Kudryavtsev VA, Lekomtseva AA, Stafeeva

AV, Koroleva EV, Egorova AO. Modernization of the educational

process: the technology of designing assessment tools for assessing

educational results: a teaching aid. Nizhny Novgorod: Minin

University. 2016.

References

[

1] Markova SM, Narkoziev AK. Methodology for the study of the

content of professional education. Vestnik of Minin University.

019;7(1):923-937.

[

2] Filchenkova IF, Paputkova GA, Grishina AV. Organizational

methods of involving teaching staff in the process of transforming

educational programs of teacher education. Scientific Opinion

[14]Gusev AN, Stafeeva AV. Applied physical training of students at

the university as the basis for the concept of developing the content

of the discipline “Physical Culture” within the framework of FSES

3 +. Baltic Humanitarian Journal.2016; 2(15):146-149.

[15]Kuryatnikov DS, Stafeeva AV, Zhemchug YuS. Improving the

professional competence of students in the process of mastering

the discipline "Physical education in high school". Azimuth of

scientific research: pedagogy and psychology.2019;1(26):186-

189.

(Pedagogical,

psychological

and

philosophical

sciences).2015;10(2):178-184.

[

3] Gruzdeva ML, Tukenova NI. Analysis of the current state of

research and development in the field of building information and

educational environments of higher educational institutions.

Vestnik of Minin University. 2019;7(2):718-723.

[

4] Shabalina EP, Dovidova MV. Designing a fund of assessment tools

for the formation of competencies of applied undergraduate. World

of Science, Culture, Education. 2015;1(50):134-136.

5] Stafeeva AV, Voronin DI. Theoretical and methodological

prerequisites for the use of eastern health systems in solving the

problems of preserving the health of students. Higher Education

Today.2013;10:153-164.

6] Stafeeva AV, Grigoryeva EL, Gusev AN. The methodology of

using recreational walking in physical education classes in a

special medical group with students with chronic diseases.

[16]Perevoshchikova EN. Conceptual framework for the design of

tools for assessing educational results. Vestnik of Minin

University.2016a;2.URL:http://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/upload/ibl

ock/07a/perevoshikova.pdf 2016a.

[17]Perevoshchikova EN. Conceptual framework for the design of

tools for assessing educational results. Vestnik of Minin

University.2016b;2.URL:

http://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/uploa-

[

d/iblock/07a/perevoshikova.pdf.

[18]Vorobyov NB, Voronin DI, Burkhanova IY, Ivanova SS, Stafeeva

AV, Kiseliv YV, Bocharin IV (2019) Ways of improving the

success of sportsmen in educational and sports activities.

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques

2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 750-755

International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology.

018;8(2).URL: http://www.ijaep.com/index.php/IJAE/issue/v-

iew/21

[

19]Larionova AA, Zaitseva NA, Anoshina YF, Gaidarenko LV,

Ostroukhov VM. The modern paradigm of transforming the

vocational education system. Astra Salvensis. 2018;6:436-448.

20]Yadryshnikov KS, Bystritskaya EB, Burkhanova IY, Ivanova SS,

Stafeeva AV, Vorobyov NB. Case-Technology Functions in

College Student Vocational. Modern journal of language teaching

methods.2018;8(3):305-316.

[

21]Magsumov TA, Artemova SF, Balanyuk LL. Regional problems

of public schools in the Russian Empire in 1869-1878 (using an

example of the Vyatka Province). European Journal of

Contemporary Education. 2018;7(2): 420-427.

22]Molchanova VS, Artemova SF, Balaniuk LL. Teaching singing in

the Russian empire educational institutions: Importance and

results. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2018;7(1):

20-225.

23]Razumovskaya M, Zaitseva NA, Larionova AA, Chudnovskiy

AD, Breusova EA. Prospects for applying various forms of

organizational integration to improve the quality of education.

Astra Salvensis. 2018;6:348-362.

24]Salimyanova IG, Novikov AA, Novikova EV, Lushchik IV,

Savderova AF, Berezina NV, Rudenko LG, Allalyev RM.

Economy digitalization: Information impact on market entities.

Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques. 2019;7(4): 654-

58.

[

25]Zaitseva NA, Larionova A, Zhukov V, Pervunin S. Role of

employers in the formation of educational programs and resources

for training of specialists in service sphere. The International

Journal of Educational Management. 2017;31(1): 3-11.

26]Zatsepin AM, Zatsepin MN, Filippova OV, Allalyev RM,

Fatkullina AA. The influence of addiction to gambling on the civil

capacity of citizens. European Research Studies Journal.

018;21(4):588-599.