2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 634-638  
J. Environ. Treat. Tech.  
ISSN: 2309-1185  
Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com  
Risk Characterization and Quantification of  
Medical Waste in Qom Province  
1
1
1
1*  
Y. Ghafuri , R. Shiri , N. Jafari. Afzal , H. Izanloo  
Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran  
Received: 10/12/2019 Accepted: 14/03/2020 Published: 20/05/2020  
Abstract  
The term healthcare waste includes all the waste generated within healthcare facilities, research centers, and laboratories of  
medical procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the the quantities and composition of waste generation and evaluate  
the hospital waste management and hazard analysis by preliminary risk analysis (PRA) in all hospitals in Qom province, Iran.  
Results showed that the production of sharp, pharmaceutical, cytotoxic, chemical, pathological, and heavy metals wastes is  
estimated to be 3.6%, 2.5%, 0.18%, 0.11%, 0.3%, and 0.01% of total wastes, respectively. Analysis and partitioning of heavy metal  
and cytotoxic waste was reported in this study. Events such as segregation and color-coded containers for pharmaceutical waste,  
especially cytotoxic waste and heavy metals, and unsupervised waste offsite transport in a hospital without safe facilities were  
identified as high-risk events. In addition, other events were identified as medium risk. Administrative procedures, maintenance,  
training treatment plant operators, and integrating training with public education on risks of healthcare waste are among the other  
issues that should be considered in providing strategies in hospital waste management.  
Keywords: Qom; Waste; Risk; Assessment; Hospital  
1
Introduction1  
2 Materials and Methods  
Public interest in emerging and developing countries to  
The hospitals of Qom province include seven public  
hospitals (i.e., Kamkar, Shahid Beheshti, Forghani, Hazrat  
Masoomeh, ImamReza, and Izadi) and tree private hospitals  
(i.e., Valiasr, Aliebn Abitaleb, andGolpaygani) that location  
of study area was shown in the figure1. In the first phase of  
the study, the quantities of waste generated in the hospitals  
were determined through a 30-day monitoring of the related  
data. For this purpose, waste records of eight categories of  
hospital waste components (i.e., infection, sharps,  
pharmaceutical, cytotoxic, chemical, heavy metals, and  
pathological and compressed containers) were considered.  
For all eight categories of waste, labeled sample bags were  
provided separately. The samples were daily collected and  
weighted using a digital mass balance. Considering the  
importance of health impact and environmental hazards of  
heavy metals and cytotoxic drugs in terms of fate and  
environmental behavior as well as different treatment and  
disposal methods depending on the physico-chemical  
properties of each of these compounds, the composition of  
cytotoxic waste and heavy metal is checked in this research.  
The quantity and composition of cytotoxic waste includes  
vials and cytotoxic drug residues as the most important part  
of cytotoxic waste was assessed in oncology wards of  
selected hospitals.  
improve health services is growing. In this regard, poor  
medical waste management within healthcare facilities have  
been challenged increasingly by several interest groups and  
communities (1). The term healthcare waste includes all the  
waste generated within healthcare facilities, research  
centers, and laboratories of medical procedures. Medical  
waste is highly “hazardous” and may pose a variety of  
environmental and health risks. Knowing the types and  
quantities of waste produced in a healthcare facility is an  
important first step in safe disposal (2, 3). Waste-generation  
data are used in estimating the capacities required for  
containers, storage areas, and transport and treatment  
technologies. Waste-generation data can be used to establish  
baseline data on rates of production in different medical  
areas and for procurement specifications, planning,  
budgeting, calculating revenues from recycling,  
optimization of waste-management systems, and  
environmental impact assessments (4). The aim of this study  
is the risk characterization and quantification of medical  
waste in public and private hospitals of Qom province (Iran)  
by a specific method to evaluate the composition of hospital  
waste and assess the health and environmental risks  
associated with medical waste management  
Corresponding author: H. Izanloo, Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom,  
Iran. Tel: +9832536602040. E-mail: h-izanloo@muq.ac.ir.  
6
34  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 634-638  
Figure 1: Location of Studied Area  
Table 1: Risk Assessment Matrix  
Hazard Severity  
No effect(1)  
Minor(2)  
Major(3)  
Fatal(4)  
Catastrophic(5)  
Likelihood  
of  
occurrence  
Very likely (5)  
1
2
3
4
5
2
4
6
8
10  
3
6
9
12  
15  
4
8
12  
16  
20  
5
Likely  
(4)  
(3)  
(2)  
10  
15  
20  
25  
Possible  
Unlikely  
Very unlikely (1)  
Low risk 1-4  
Medium risk 5-12  
High risk 15-25  
The rate of generation and Percentage of heavy metals  
component (Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Zn and Pb) in the hospital’s  
waste were determined, the composition analysis of waste  
containing heavy metals segregated into a plastic container  
and identification of heavy metals types was carried by the  
survey team who had experience in medical waste  
management.In the next stage, a questionnaire about medical  
waste management was prepared. This data collection tool,  
which was based on the order of the Iranian Ministry of  
Health, includes the process of waste management in the  
stage of segregation and storage, collection and  
transportation, treatment, and final disposal (5,6,7).  
4
Results and Discussion  
Waste estimation of the hospitals was performed  
according to eight types of medical waste. The average daily  
medical waste generated in the hospitals of Qom province  
are presented in Table 3. These data are shown according to  
the number of each hospital from 1 to 10, in the order of the  
hospital listed in the previous section. The results of waste  
generation in hospitals show that about 2363 kg/day medical  
waste is produced and, accordingly, the rate of hospital  
waste generation per bed is 1.2 kg/bed/day. About 93% of  
the province’s special medical waste is dedicated to the  
production of infectious waste. Other results also showed  
that the production of sharp, pharmaceutical, cytotoxic,  
chemical, pathological, and heavy metal wastes is 3.6%,  
3
Risk assessment  
In the second phase of the study, hazard analysis and risk  
2
.5%, 0.18%, 0.11%, 0.3%, and 0.01% of total wastes,  
respectively. The findings of this study are like those of  
Ghafuri and Naizadeh about the composition and quantity of  
cytotoxic waste from oncology wards. They showed that the  
mean production rate of medical waste in two hospitals of  
Qom province was 1.73 kg/bed/d, including 92% infection  
waste (1.67 kg/bed/d), 2.5% sharp, 5% pharmaceutical  
waste, and cytotoxic waste was 293.5(gr/d), which is equal  
to 0.07% of total medical waste generation (4). Compared  
with these studies, other reports from Iran showed different  
results. Farzadkia et al. reported hospital waste as 2.3  
Kg/bed/day; Askarian et al. reported a medium rate of 8.025  
Kg/bed/day at private hospitals of Shiraz, Iran; Alimohamad  
et al. estimated a medium rate of 4.38Kg/bed/day at Shariati  
Hospital of Tehran; Overall, these results show that medical  
waste rates vary widely and must be estimated by local  
measurements (10,11,12). Results about partitioning of  
assessment by using the preliminary risk analysis (PRA)  
were considered. This is a semi-quantitative technique for  
risk assessment based on the identification and ranking of  
potential hazards and risks related to all processes of medical  
waste management. The level of risk is according to the  
multiplication of severity and likelihood criteria, presented  
in Tables 1 and 2 (8, 9).  
Table 2: Severity of Consequence Criteria  
No effect  
Minor  
Major  
Has no effect on health  
Minor injury  
Injury  
Hazardous  
Catastrophic  
Serious or fatal injury  
Death  
6
35  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 634-638  
heavy metals and cytotoxic drugs in hospital wastes is  
indicated in Figure 1 and 2. Figure 1 demonestrated that the  
highest percentages of ferrous metals in hospital wastes in  
Qom province are related to Zn and Cu however, other  
amounts of Hg and P are also not negligible.this results is  
Comparable with study results of liu et al about  
Characteristics and evalution of heavy metals concentration  
in the Medical Waste Incinerator Fly Ash (13). Results of  
Partitioning of cytotoxic drugs in figure 3 was show that  
maximum percentage of drug cytotoxic wastes is related to  
Cyclophosphamide. The results of the risk analysis of  
hospital Waste Management in hospitals of Qom province  
are shown in Table 4.  
Table 3: Average Daily Generation (kg/day) of Hospitals Waste in Qom province  
Pressurized  
Container  
Hospital  
No  
Beds  
Number  
Heavy  
metals  
Infection  
Sharp  
Pharmaceutical  
Cytotoxic  
Chemical  
Pathological  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
234  
540  
245  
158  
110  
100  
110  
158  
118  
233  
2012  
240  
400  
300  
167  
233  
263  
90  
187  
95  
224  
2200  
5.5  
24  
1.7  
12  
6
-
2.5  
-
0.16  
-
-
-
1.7  
-
-
0.18  
-
1.5  
0.2  
-
-
-
-
-
0.006  
0.0025  
-
4.5  
0.0026  
-
1.33  
1.26  
-
-
0.12  
-
8.4  
8.5  
5.8  
5.6  
7.5  
4.3  
8.68  
6
6.7  
7.5  
4
4.1  
3.6  
9.15  
4.41  
59  
0.012  
-
0.27  
-
-
-
-
-
0.09  
-
0.02  
0.035  
-
-
0.5  
0.2  
-
1
0
-
-
total  
85  
4.36  
2.63  
0.282  
9.55  
0.255  
other  
Cu  
Zn  
Hg  
Pb  
Cd  
Cr  
0
10  
20  
30  
40  
50  
60  
70  
80  
partitioning of heavy metal(%)  
Figure 2: Partitioning of heavy metals in hospital wastes (%)  
IFOSFAM IDE  
14.1  
L-ASPAR AGIN ASE  
M ETHOTER EXATE  
DAC AR B AZIN  
M ESNA  
6.6  
8.3  
6.6  
12.5  
ER INOTEC AN  
B LEOM YC IN  
10  
5.8  
C YC LOPHOSPHAM IDE  
C ISPLATIN  
15  
2.5  
1.2  
2.2  
7.5  
6.6  
5
FLUOUR AC IL  
OXALIP LATIN  
C AR B OPLATIN  
VINC R ISTINE  
ETOPOSIDE  
C YTAR AB INE  
6.6  
PARTITIONING OF CYTOTOXIC DRUGS %  
Figure 3: Partitioning of cytotoxic drugs in cytotoxic wastes (%)  
6
36  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 634-638  
Table 4: Risk Analysis of Hospital Waste Management  
Stage of  
Risk Analyze  
waste  
management  
Events  
Hazard Identification  
Control of Risk  
Likelihood  
Severity  
Risk  
Segregation and color-  
coded containers for  
pharmaceutical waste  
especially cytotoxic  
waste and heavy metals metals  
is not predicted  
-pharmaceutical and cytotoxic  
- Hazards from genotoxic waste should be separated and  
and cytotoxic waste  
- hazard from heavy  
stored carefully away from  
other waste  
- Modification and  
improvement of Interim storage  
sites with the national  
regulation  
Segregation  
and Storage  
4
4
16  
- Incidence of  
contamination by  
biohazards  
Interim storage does  
not comply with the  
national regulation  
Lack of planning and  
forecasting of  
3
3
3
4
9
collection routes in  
hospital unit  
- The spread of infection  
in the sensitive area of  
-Collection routs of waste must  
be start from the most sensitive  
12  
Transport trolleys  
Are not appropriately  
sized according to the  
volumes of waste  
generated and  
periodically  
disinfected.  
Unsupervised waste  
offsite transport in  
hospital without safe  
facilities  
hospital and increase risk areas and follow a fixed route  
of disease  
around other medical areas and  
interim storage locations  
-Waste containers, trolleys and  
vehicles are maintained and  
cleaned regularly.  
Collection  
and  
Transport  
- Unsupervised waste  
management poses a  
high risk of disease  
transmission among  
health-care workers,  
waste workers and the  
general public  
3
4
3
4
9
Develop active monitoring  
program for offsite transport of  
waste  
16  
location and  
surroundings of the  
treatment site and  
disposal facility is not  
appropriate  
Improper disposal of  
sharps In hospitals  
without disposal  
facilities  
3
4
3
3
9
-Spread of contamination Development of a hospital  
and health threats  
waste  
Treatment  
and Final  
Disposal  
-Survival of pathogenic  
microorganisms and  
increase of needle stick  
for worker and public  
management plan that should  
comply with national  
regulations  
- Treatment plant operators  
Cleaning staff  
12  
Lack of sufficient  
knowledge in the  
operators of disposal  
facilities  
Employees to be trained  
3
3
9
The risk assessment process reported in this table relates  
to each of the waste management processes including  
segregation and storage, collection and transportation,  
treatment, and disposal; however, the waste management  
situation investigated in the hospital did not comply with  
Iranian regulation. Based on the results, events including  
segregation and color-coded containers for pharmaceutical  
waste (especially, cytotoxic waste and heavy metals) and  
unsupervised waste offsite transport in a hospital without  
safe facilities were identified as high-risk events and other  
events were identified as medium risk. According to the  
results of Farzadkia et al. about Management of Hospital  
Waste in Tehran, Iran, conditions of waste storage systems  
and collection planning were unsuitable; also, the reported  
results are consistent with the present study (11). Moreover,  
the study of Mansouri on the preliminary hazard analysis as  
a tool for risk assessment of sari hospital waste indicates the  
high risks in the hospital waste management system [14,15].  
In another study, Sefuhi conducted a risk assessment on the  
healthcare waste in the Hospital of Batna City (Algeria).  
According to the results of the preliminary hazard analysis  
and Risk Assessment Matrix, this researcher reported that  
sharps, infectious waste, and human anatomical waste are in  
the area of high risks. This result is different from the results  
of this study. However, it is consistent with the results of a  
study of Alwabr with the subject of medical waste in  
6
37  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 634-638  
hospitals of Yemen, where it was reported that the events of  
waste handling processes were in high-risk levels by the  
PRA analysis technique (8,9).  
Tehran, Iran” Health Scope. 2018, 7(2), e61412, doi:  
1
0.5812/jhealthscope.61412.  
[
11] Farzadkia, M., Moradi, A., Shah Mohammadi, M., Jorfi, S.,  
Hospital waste management status in Iran: a case study in the  
teaching hospitals of Iran University of Medical Sciences.  
5
Conclusion  
Based on the results of the present study, setting a plan  
that involves a strategy for implementing improved waste  
management and the allocation of roles, responsibilities, and  
resources is of high necessity. Such a plan would lead to  
developing a policy on regional and cooperative methods of  
healthcare waste treatment with considering minimization,  
separation, handling, transport, treatment, and final disposal  
[12] Susi A Wilujeng, Enri Damanhuri and Mochammad Chaerul  
medical waste management in private clinics in surabaya and  
factors affecting it,International Journal of GEOMATE, 2019,  
,
Zeng, Gui-Sheng Liu and Jian-Hua Zhou , Characteristics and  
Treatment Methods of Medical Waste Incinerator Fly Ash: A  
Review, Processes 2018, 6, 173, doi:10.3390/pr6100173  
(
16). One of the important results of this study is the  
composition of hospital waste and heavy metal content and  
the genotoxicity of oncology wastes released into the  
environment (17). Administrative procedures, maintenance,  
training treatment plant operators, and integrating training  
with public education on risks of healthcare waste are among  
the other subjects that should be considered in providing  
strategies in hospital waste management.  
[14] Tayebeh Mansouri, Mahmood Alimohammadi,Ramin  
Nabizadeh Nodehi,Kamyar Yaghmaeian, AliAzari, Risk  
Assessment of Sari Fatemeh Zahra Hospital Using Failure  
Mode Effect Analysis, Individualized Rapid Assessment Tool  
and Preliminary Hazard Analysis, J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci  
2
018, 28 (161), 89-107 (Persian).  
[
15] C. Bokhoree,Y. Beeharry,T. Makoondlall-Chadee,T. Doobah  
and N. Soomary ,Assessment of Environmental and Health  
Risks Associated with the Management of Medical Waste in  
Mauritius, APCBEE Procedia, 2014, 9 ,36  41.  
Acknowledgment  
[
16] I Gusti Ngurah Gede Putra, Sang Putu Kaler Surata, Gusti Ayu  
Ari Agung , Medical waste management strategy in the  
inpatient primary health care center with system approach: a  
SWOT Analysis” 2017, Bali Medical Journal (Bali Med J) 3(3)  
This project has been supported by the Qom University  
of Medical Sciences Health Services. The authors would like  
to thank environmental health engineering’s of Qom  
hospitals.  
2
017  
[
17] Y. Ghafuria, M. Yunesian, R. Nabizadeh, A. Mesdaghinia,M.  
H. Dehghani• M. Alimohammad ,Environmental risk  
assessment of platinum cytotoxic drugs,a focus on toxicity  
characterization of hospital effluents, , Int. J. Environ. Sci.  
Technol, (2017) 14:2783, DOI 10.1007/s13762-017-1586-6.  
Reference  
[
1] WHO, Safe management of wastes from health-care activities,  
2
014.  
[
2] A. Pruss, Safe management of wastes from health-care activities,  
Department of Protection of the Human Environment World  
Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland -1999.  
[
[
3] ICRC ,medical waste management ,2011, www.icrc.org.  
4] Y. Ghafuri and R. Nabizadeh, Composition and quantity of  
cytotoxic waste from oncology wards:  
A survey of  
environmental characterization and source management of  
medical cytotoxic waste, Biosci. Biotech. Res. Comm. (2017) ,  
1
0(3) 438-444 , DOI: 10.21786/bbrc/10.3/17.  
[
[
[
[
5] A.T. Lando, S. H. Aly, A. Zubair, I.R. Rahim,M. Hustim, I.  
Djamaluddin, R. Ibrahim, R. Zakaria, M.A. Caronge  
,
Evaluation Study of Medical Solid Waste Management in  
Syekh Yusuf Gowa Hospital, International Journal of  
Engineering and Science Application, 2017, 4 (2) .  
6] Sh Mardani, Kh Alimohammadzade, A Maher, SM Hoseini, K  
Yaghmaeian ,Ranking the hospitals in terms of hospital waste  
reduction criteria case study: educational hospitals of Shahid  
Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBUMS)Iran, J.  
Health & Environ, 2019, 12(2) .  
7] Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Hassanvand MS, Mesdaghinia AR,  
Yaghmaeian K, Momeniha F. Investigation of existing status of  
hazardous wastes management in central campus of Tehran  
University Medical Sciences, Iran. Iranian Journal of Health  
and Environment, (2009), 2(3) 214-23 (in Persian).  
8] Gawad M. A. Alwabr , Ahmed S. Al-Mikhlafi , risk assessment  
of the current handling of medical waste in hospitals of sana'a  
city, yemen, International Journal of Science and Technology,  
(2017)  
3(1)  
01-09,  
DOI  
https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/Mijst.2017.31.0109.  
[
[
9] L. Sefouhi, M. Kalla, L. Bahmed, and L. Aouragh ,The Risk  
Assessment for the Healthcare Waste in the Hospital of Batna  
City, Algeria, International Journal of Environmental Science  
andDevelopment,2014,4(4),DOI:10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.390.  
10] Mahdi Farzadkia, Hamideh Akbari, Hamid Gholami, and Adel  
Darabi “Management of HospitalWaste: A Case Study in  
6
38