Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 643-64ꢀ
depend on the stereotypesand cliches of mass consumer
consciousness, inherited from the past and emerging in the
present tense. In other words, any territorial brand is a vital
metaphor that represents a unique synthesis of the magic of a
geographical place, its history, modernity and future,
combined with the reproduction of local distinctive and
unique marketing products: goods, services and technologies.
Due to the synthesis of favorable causes and conditions, some
territorial brands become megabrands, cross regional, country
and continental borders, turn into global brands, high-value
brands that are recognized and consumed everywhere.
A lot of factual evidence can be given illustrating these
conclusions. For example, at the beginning of the Cold War in
the 1950s, the US Information Agency (USIA) funded
pavilion expositions in the USSR and Eastern Europe, which
attracted huge crowds of people seeking to look at life hidden
outside the "Iron Curtain". In 1959, on the day the USIA
exposition opened in Moscow, visitors stole dozens of books
from display cases representing the products of US publishers.
The organizers of the exhibition rejected the requirement of
the Kremlin authorities to nail the second copies laid out as a
replacement to the display cases with nails [9].
The conditions of the “closed and besieged fortress” in
which the Soviet Union existed during the Cold War era were
supplemented by mechanisms of directive planning and
command and administrative management of the economy,
the main function of which was to ensure the accelerated
development of the production of means of production in
comparison with the production of goods, services and
technologies to meet mass consumer demand. While this
function was historically and politically justified during the
period of industrialization and strengthening the defense
capability of the state, then during the achievement of nuclear
missile parity with the United States, the development of the
scientific and technological revolution, the growth of
industrial and agricultural production, it was transformed into
a dysfunction, turned into an obstacle and a brake on social
and cultural development of society.
The shortage of goods in the USSR not only increased in
the 70s and 80s of the XX century, it led to deformations of
the country's territorial structure. The systems of economic
and geographical planning and distribution were not just
flawed, they were destructive and targeted. All regions of the
country were strictly differentiated according to industrial and
defense criteria. In other words, Moscow and Leningrad, the
capitals of the Union republics, millionaire cities and closed
cities, profiled for the development and production of nuclear,
chemical and bacteriological weapons, was given priority to a
centralized supply of consumer goods, services and
technologies.
elected President of the Russian Federation. In the next film,
which film director released, the territory of the Urals began
to be flattering and respectfully called the “magical country of
malachite,” but the prevailing public opinion did not change
this.
After the collapse of the USSR, in January 1992, thanks to
the signing of the presidential decree “On Freedom of Trade”,
entrepreneurial activity was officially legalized in the country.
According to experts, the food shortage in Russia as a result of
the earned mechanism of market demand and supply was
overcome in 1993, the saturation of the consumer market with
import marketing products was recorded in 1995. The results
of sociological surveys of the population over a quarter of a
century record that majority of Russians surveyed recognize a
qualitative and quantitative improvement in the supply and
provision of goods, services and technologies compared to the
Soviet period [15].
At the same time, the new socio-economic realities in
Russia associated with the transition to a multistructure
economy indicate that despite the improvement in supplying
and providing local consumers with marketing products, the
influence of territorial brands continues to have an
unfavorable effect on them. If during the years of Soviet
power food delicacies, fashionable, stylish and high-quality
clothes, shoes, hats, cosmetics, perfumes, underwear,
furniture, motor vehicles, books and records were in short
supply, in modern Russia, thanks to liberal market reforms,
the main scarce resource became a “commodity of goods,” the
universal equivalent of value – money.
At the end of 2018, Russia ranked only 67th in the global
salary rating, which was compiled by the International Labor
Organization (ILO). For comparison: Switzerland takes the 1st
place in the indicated ranking, Luxembourg – 2nd, Qatar –
3rd, Australia – 4th, United Arab Emirates – 5, USA – 9th,
nd
Canada – 22 .
In this regard, it is no coincidence that more than a third –
39% of Russian workers are not satisfied with the level of
their wages and, accordingly, their current consumption
structure. According to a representative sociological survey of
1,500 respondents across Russia conducted by the Public
Opinion Foundation (FOM) in August 2019, median wage
values amounted to 21 thousand rubles. According to most
Russians, although they have adapted to live "within their
means", their earnings do not correspond to the volume and
level of difficulty of the work they face. Fair, from their point
of view, would be wages one and a half – two times higher –
in the range of 25 – 45 thousand rubles.
According to official statistics from Rosstat, the number
of citizens with incomes below the subsistence level in the
second quarter of 2019 amounted to 18.6 million people –
12.7% of the total population of the Russian Federation: in
fact, compared with the second quarter of 2018, this indicator
increased by 0.2%. In this regard, the Ministry of Economic
Development of the Russian Federation was forced to revise
its forecast for the growth rate of real disposable expenditures
of the population to 0.1% compared to 1.0% previously
projected.
In July 2019, Sberbank Life Insurance company carried
out a telephone survey in 37 large Russian cities with a
population of more than 500 thousand people, as well as in the
cities of Grozny and Sevastopol [16]. A total of 13,650
respondents were interviewed. In their opinion, fair wages
averaged 66 thousand rubles. per month – this money is
enough to not only satisfy current needs, but also save up for
large purchases, as well as save money for the future [17]. In
the number of territories, for example, in the cities of Lipetsk,
Penza, Barnaul and Ryazan, residents agree to earn in the
In everyday life, this was manifested in the fact that
residents of small non-industrial cities and rural settlements
were forced to travel to the capital, republican and regional
centers for goods, services and technologies. Many large
regions of the country in terms of customer satisfaction in the
informal rating of mass consciousness became backward,
uncompetitive, not comfortable and not suitable for permanent
residence [14]. In a metaphorical form, the prevailing
territorial disparities in the status distribution and
consumption were voiced in 1985, when the feature film “The
Most Charming and Attractive” was released on the screens of
Soviet cinemas.In this film, the Ural region was represented as
a wild and uncivilized geographical place. For a joke sounded
in the movie –“Is she from the Urals?” – directed and the
leadership of the Goskino of the USSR were forced to
apologize to the head of the Sverdlovsk regional committee of
the CPSU B.N. Yeltsin, who later became the first popularly
6
36