Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
J. Environ. Treat. Tech.  
ISSN: 2309-1185  
Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com  
Development of an Analytical Method for  
Determination of Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin in  
Resource Water, Prediction and Environmental  
Risk Assessment  
M. Alimohammadi 1,2, M. Asadi-Ghalhari , Y. Ghafuri *  
3
3
1
Department of Environmental Health Engineering , School of Public Health , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran  
2
Center for Water Quality Research, Institute for Environmental Research (IER), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran  
3
Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran  
Received: 21/05/2020  
Accepted: 16/07/2020  
Published: 20/09/2020  
Abstract  
Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin as cytotoxic drugs have developed in recent years as a group of antineoplastic agents, have the ability  
to kill or stop the growth of certain living cells and are used in chemotherapy of cancer. That their function is through the disruption of  
cell division. This study aimed to determine carboplatin and Oxaliplatin in wastewater samples by the characterization of the LC-MS/MS  
method. The method was carried out on ODS C18 (250 mm, 3.5 µm) in which the mobile phase was A = Water +0.1% formic acid, B=  
methanol +0.1% formic acid, (A / B) = 20:80(V/V), flow rate: 0.3 mL/min, and injection volumes: 5 µL. The method was validated for  
LOD, LOQ, accuracy and precision. Results of environmental risk assessment showed that RQ (risk quotient) for Carboplatin and  
Oxaliplatin were 0.51 and 0.038 respectively that indicates all of platinum compounds had low environmental exposure risk . In this  
regard, studies should be carried out to evaluate the toxicity and genotoxicity effects of the metabolites of cytotoxic platinum compounds  
and strategies to removal of these compounds.  
Keywords: Carboplatin, Oxaliplatin, Risk, Assessment  
Introduction1  
especially for platinum ion, in environmental samples, and  
1
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV  
detection, to measure the complexity of the platinum drug has  
applied. Of course, the above methods are about the relatively  
high levels of platinum in environmental samples. HPLC  
coupled with triple quadrupole (QqQ) mass spectrometry (MS)  
is a commonly used method with high effectiveness for  
measurement of pharmaceutical residues in various  
environmental samples (7, 8, and 9). Currently, in all oncology  
wards of hospitals in Qom Province in the central part of Iran,  
platinum complexes containing carboplatin and oxaliplatin are  
widely incorporated. This study aimed to develope of an  
analytical Method for determination of Carboplatin and  
Oxaliplatin in resource water, prediction and environmental  
risk assessment.  
Very low levels of drug combinations in water and  
wastewater environments around the world have been widely  
considered (1). Cytotoxic drugs have developed in recent years  
as a group of antineoplastic agents, have the ability to kill or  
stop the growth of certain living cells and are used in  
chemotherapy of cancer. That their function is through the  
disruption of cell division (2). Most of the anticancer drugs are  
classified as mutations or teratogenic for humans. According to  
guidelines and regulations for the safe handling of anticancer  
drugs, many studies have shown that the staff and the medical  
staff are exposed to these drug (3). Carboplatin and oxaliplatin  
are complexes of Pt that utilize anticancer drug and are  
effective in the treatment of testicular and ovarian cancer.  
Anticancer drugs are also very effective in the treatment of  
many malignant tumors, lymphomas, and so on (4). Anticancer  
Platinum complex drugs have important antitumor activity  
caused particularly by the Cross-linking of DNA and formation  
of DNA adducts, subsequently triggering apoptosis and leading  
to cell death. Platinum complex drugs are excreted by patients  
and released to the urban wastewater system. Health impacts  
are considerable with the incomplete removal of  
pharmaceutical compounds, especially the platinum complex  
2 Materials and Methods  
2.1 Chemicals and reagents  
Analytical standards of platinum complexes carboplatin  
(Car-pt, Cas 41575-94-4) and oxaliplatin (Oxa-pt, Cas 61825-  
94-3) were provided by Sigma-Aldrich with the highest  
percentage of purity (>99%). All solvents were of HPLC grade,  
and all chemicals were of analytical reagent grade. Formic acid  
(98100%), ammonium hydroxide (25%), methanol, and  
HPLC-water were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt,  
Germany). The selected platinum, according to some  
environmental fate and chemical structure, is shown in Table 1.  
(
5, 6). Several methods for determining of platinum complex  
drugs were provided containing Atomic absorption  
Spectrometry (AAS), inductively coupled plasma (ICP),  
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)  
Corresponding author: Y. Ghafuri, Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.  
Tel: +9832536602040, E-mail: yadollahghafuri@yahoo.com  
1
168  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
Individual solutions of each compound, including Car-pt (4000  
µg/mL) and Oxa-pt (2200 µg/mL) were prepared and stored in  
the dark at −20ºC.  
2.4 Lc-Ms/Ms instruments  
Samples were analyzed by an Agilent Technologies  
separation module, ZORBAX, SB, C18 column (250 mm, 3.5  
µm)in the liquid chromatography/auto-sampler system with a  
5mm particle size in which the mobile phase was A= Water  
+0.1% formic acid, B= methanol +0.1% formic acid, (A / B) =  
20:80 (V/V), flow rate: 0.3 mL/min, and injection volumes: 5  
µL. Mass spectrometry was performed using an Agilent G6410  
2
.2 Stability tests  
Stability of each analyte in biological matrix should be  
confirmed, minimally at low and high short term storage at  
room temperature. The storage time should be based on the  
expected duration test that samples are maintained at this  
temperature during the intended study (4-24 hr).  
Triple Quadrapole Mass spectrometer equipped with  
a
commercial ESI source. For ESI-MS experiments, nitrogen was  
used as the sheath gas (100 psi) at the drying gas flow of 6  
ml/min. An electro spray voltage of 4.5 kV and a capillary  
temperature of 3500 °C with dwell time of 500msand mass  
range of 180-1000 amu were used. Multiple reaction  
monitoring (MRM) was performed for detection. For  
2
.3 Sample preparation and SPE extraction of carboplatin  
and oxaliplatin  
For the measurement, monitoring, and extraction of  
carboplatin and oxaliplatin in water and wastewater samples,  
samples were collected from wastewater treatment plant and  
water distribution stations in Qom which serve a population of  
+
carboplatin and oxaliplatin, the [M+H] ions were monitored  
at m/z 372.0 and m/z 396.0 as the precursor ion and a fragment  
at m/z 355 and 96.0 as the product ion, respectively. Results are  
presented in Table 2 (3).  
1
200000. All analytical standard solution samples were  
vacuum-filtered through 0.7m-pore size fiber glass filters,  
followed by Cellulose acetate circles (OE 67), 0.45 µm, ester  
+
membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA).ENV SPE cartridges  
2.5 Calibration standards / quality control  
were considered in this study. To improve recovery extraction,  
Standard stock solutions of carboplatin (4000 µg/mL) and  
oxaliplatin (2200 µg/mL) were prepared in methanol. Standard  
stock solutions at the concentration level of 1, 5, 10, 25, and  
50ng/mL were prepared for analytical standards and quality  
control standards of carboplatin and oxaliplatin in methanol and  
then injected. These standard solutions were stored at −20ºCin  
a freezer until analyzed.  
5
mL of the sample was acidified to pH 2.5 with hydrochloric  
acid, and 1 mL of 5 % (w/v) EDTA was added to obtain an  
EDTA concentration of 0.1 % (w/v). The samples were loaded  
+
in an ENV SPE cartridge previously conditioned with 5 mL of  
methanol and 5 mL of ultrapure water at the flow rate of 5  
mL/min. After conditioning, 5 mL of spiked sample was passed  
through the cartridges. The sample flasks were then rinsed with  
6
mL of ultrapure water, and the rinsate was also loaded onto  
the cartridges. The samples were eluted of the cartridges with  
.5 mL of methanol and acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) and transferred  
to HPLC sample vials for analysis.  
2.6 Method validation  
2.6.1 Linearity, precision, and accuracy  
0
The analytical curves were provided by concentration  
levels of carboplatin and oxaliplatin which were previously  
described. Correlation coefficients > 0.9998 and 0.999 were  
obtained for carboplatin and oxaliplatin, respectively. Precision  
and accuracy for the concentration of the calibration point (n =  
5
) of below 15% were considered.  
Table 1: Characteristics and some environmental fate of carboplatin and Oxaliplatin extracted by a theoretical model (EPI Suite 4.1)  
10)  
(
Physico-chemical properties  
Compound  
Structure  
Molecular  
mass  
Boiling  
Point  
vapor  
pressure  
Logkw  
Solubility  
p
ka  
3
78  
-1.78  
Carboplatin  
11.7  
6.6  
772  
780  
4.59e -0.19  
4.8e-0.19  
Oxaliplatin  
Compound  
397  
-1.65  
7.9  
6.1  
Table 2: MRM setting for Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin  
Retention Time  
Segment  
ESI  
Product Ion  
MS/MS transition  
372 > 355.0  
[
[
M+H]+  
M+H]+  
Carboplatin  
Oxaliplatin  
5.3  
5.3  
1
1
ESI+  
ESI+  
398 > 96.0  
1
169  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
2
.6.2 Recovery  
values of Carbolatin and Oxaliplatin in the wastewater effluent  
was considered. For the worst case scenario for PEC  
calculation, the highest concentration of Carboplatin and  
Oxaliplatin in the measured environmental concentration from  
influent of municipal waste water (MEC) were considered as  
PEC [3]. The reliability of the PEC value that is a key point for  
the assessment of environmental risks for aquatic organisms is  
based on the ratio of PEC/MEC estimated with an acceptable  
consistency for the ratio 0.24 range (13, 14, and 15).  
The absolute recovery of carboplatin and oxaliplatin was  
determined from the labeled five concentrations standard (1.5,  
0.25, and 50.00 ng/mL) of carboplatin and oxaliplatin using  
1
+
SPE cartridge (ENV ) as the extraction sorbent for analytes  
with a wide range of polarity characteristics. The results were  
expressed using the equation below:  
퐂 spiked−퐂 unspiked  
Recovery =  
%
퐂 added  
2
.9 Hazard characterization  
In this study, recovery of more than 50% was considered as  
the required sensitivity.  
For hazard characterization, PNEC (predicted no effect  
concentration) of Carbolatin and Oxaliplatin for aquatic  
animals were taken from literature data were selected 1.22 µg/l  
2
.6.3 Limit of quantification (LOQ) and detection (LOD)  
[
16].  
For LOD determination, the minimum amount of  
compound analyzed in the lc-ms/ms that product a signal-to-  
noise (S/N) ratio of 3, was defined and for LOQ, a minimum  
amount of compound that produced an S/N ratio of 10, was  
considered. The limits of detection (LOD) and the limits of  
quantification (LOQ) were calculated using the following  
equations:  
2
.10 Risk characterization  
The risk quotient (RQ), is used to express the risk  
characterization it is calculated by combining the results of  
PEC with PNEC (RQ =PEC/PNEC). In this method,  
interpretation of data on probable ecological risk effects of  
contaminated water contain: RQ <1.0 indicates no significant  
risk; 1.0 ≤ RQ <10 indicates a small potential for adverse  
effects; and 10 ≤ RQ< 100 indicates significant potential for  
adverse effects (13, 14, and 15).  
LOD = 3:3σ/ S  
LOQ =10σ/S  
3
Results and Discussion  
where σ is the standard error of the intercept and S is the slope  
of the standard additionscalibration curve (11, 12).  
3
.1 LC-MS Results  
The analysis of carboplatin and oxaliplatin using the  
multiple reactions monitoring (mrm) function was highly  
selective with no interfering compound and no internal  
standards. Because of the polar, hydrophilic nature of platinum  
complexes (oxaliplatin and carboplatin) in the lc-column, we  
first investigated the use of reversedphase C18 for analysis  
which showed that the analyte was not retained in the column.  
Figures 1 to 8illustrate the chromatograms and mass spectra  
obtained from concentrations (10and 50.00 ng/mL) in spiked  
samples.  
2
.7 Ecological risk assessment  
In this study ecological risk assessment is the process for  
evaluating and predict how likely it is that the environment may  
be impacted as a result of exposure to Carbolatin and  
Oxaliplatin from wastewater effluent that is carried in three  
stage approach including determination of PEC, hazard  
characterization and risk characterization.  
2
.8 Determination of PEC  
Determination of predicted environmental concentration  
(
PEC) based on the results of the study to measure residual  
Figure 1: Chromatogram of Oxaliplatin at 10 ng/ml  
1
170  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
Figure 2: Chromatogram of Carboplatin at 10 ng/ml  
Figure 3: Mass spectra for oxaliplatin showing tentative peak assignment at 10 ng/ml  
Figure 4: Mass spectra for carboplatin showing tentative peak assignment at 1 0ng/ml  
1
171  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
Figure 5: Chromatogram of oxaliplatin at 50 ng/ml  
Figure 6: Chromatogram of carboplatin at 50 ng/ml  
Figure 7: Mass spectra for carboplatin showing tentative peak assignment at 50 ng/ml  
1
172  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
Figure 8: Mass spectra for carboplatin showing tentative peak assignment at 50 ng/ml  
In the study by Burns et al. on liquid chromatographymass  
spectrometry for the detection of platinum antineoplastic  
complexes for an aqueous mixture of carboplatin, results  
indicated that the compound were well separated on the lc  
and oxaliplatin, respectively(Table4).In the study by Fleury–  
Souverain to provide an overview of analytical methods for the  
determination of the most commonly used anticancer drugs, for  
carboplatin and oxaliplatin in the pharmaceutical formulation  
or biological sample lc-ms/ms have been pointed. In  
environmental studies (air, surface, and wastewater),  
voltammetry and ICP-MS with a LOD of 0.1ng/mL was  
reported. Therefore, in this study, considering the determined  
LOD, can be successfully approved for measurement of  
carboplatin and oxaliplatin in water and waste water samples.  
+
column and molecular ion (MH )formation had occurred. In the  
noted study, ion peaks were observed at m/z 372 for carboplatin  
and LOD equaled 35 ng/mL. The results of the noted study  
were confirmed in the present work.  
3
.2 Quantification and Method Validation  
Linearity, recovery, precision, and accuracy were  
considered as the criteria for the validation of the analytical  
method. In the present work, calibrations were linear in the  
investigated range with the correlation coefficient of greater  
than 0.99 for both analytes. As explained in the Materials and  
Methods section, instrumental LOD and LOQ were calculated  
and, on that basis, LOD and LOQ equaled 0.013ng/L and 0.4  
ng/L for carboplatin and 0.09 ng/L and 0.027 ng/L for  
oxaliplatin, respectively. Results are presented in Table 3. The  
precision and accuracy (analysis with spiking samples for this  
method were assessed by QC sample in six replicate at five  
concentration (1.5.10.25.50) for carboplatin and oxaliplatin  
according to recovery (%) via SPE extraction. A recovery of  
more than 50% was considered to obtain the required  
sensitivity. This method demonstrated that the recovery (%) of  
carboplatin and oxaliplatin equaled 0.78 and 0.74, respectively.  
RSD% ranged from 6 to 8.9% and 7.5 to 7.9% for carboplatin  
3.3 Estimation of ecological risk assessment  
For environmental risk estimation with considering PEC  
scenario, PNEC criteria of Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin, RQ  
was calculated. The results of the RQ value are represented in  
Table (5).  
In this study RQ in process of estimation of risk were  
determined. The RQ calculated for Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin  
(0.51 and 0.038 respectively) showed that these platinum  
complex drugs could have no significant risk on aquatic  
organism. In the study of Daouk and et al about Dynamics of  
active pharmaceutical ingredients loads in a Swiss university  
hospital wastewaters and prediction of the related  
environmental risk for the aquatic ecosystems, And  
determining the values of PEC, confirmed the results of the  
current study (16).  
Table 3: Calibration curves (n = 6) for Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin  
Analyte  
Spiking Concentration (ng/ml)  
Concentration measured (mean ± SD ng/ml)  
Accuracy (%)  
102  
1
5
1.02 ± 0.19  
5.14 ± 0.62  
9.96 ± 0.17  
25.1 ± 0.04  
50.4 ± 0.06  
1.05 ± 0.08  
4.97 ± 0.14  
10.22 ± 0.21  
25.3 ± 0.06  
50.3 ± 03  
102.8  
100.4  
100.4  
100.8  
105  
1
2
5
1
5
1
2
5
0
5
0
Carboplatin  
100.6  
102.2  
101.2  
100.6  
0
5
0
Oxaliplatin  
1
173  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
Table 4: Precision and quality control parameters (analysis with spiking samples and recovery extraction %) for Carboplatin and  
Oxaliplatin  
Analyte  
Spiking Concentration (ng/ml)  
Concentration measured in SPE ( mean ± SD ng/ml)  
1
5
0.78 ± 0.06  
4.09 ± 0.064  
7.89 ± 0.078  
19.86 ± 0.069  
40.4 ± 0.089  
0.74 ± 0.075  
4.04 ± 0.077  
7.81 ±0.099  
19.76 ± 0.088  
40.3 ± 079  
1
2
5
1
5
1
2
5
0
5
0
Carboplatin  
0
5
0
Oxaliplatin  
Table 5: Results of ecological risk assessment of Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin in resource water  
Environmental Concentration (µg/L)  
Elements  
PEC/MEC(mean)  
PNEC  
µg/L)  
RQ  
Mean  
0.38  
Typical range  
0.63 - < LOQ  
0.048 - < LOQ  
PEC  
0.63  
(
Carboplatin  
Oxaliplatin  
1.65  
0.43  
1.22  
1.22  
0.51  
0.039  
0.048  
0.038  
Results in this study were reasonable to those Cunningham,  
et al related to human health risk assessment from the presence  
of human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment that the  
values of drug residues and comparison with PEC  
environmental concentration report the risk of exposure to  
negligible (17). A survey on anticancer drugs in surface waters  
and occurrence and environmental significance of cytotoxic by  
Besse et al the PEC values for, platinum drug combinations  
including Carboplatin and Oxaliplatin was 0.52 ng/L and 0.72  
ng/L respectively, which approved the results of present study  
Authors’ contribution  
All authors of this study have a complete contribution for  
data collection, data analyses and manuscript writing  
Reference  
[
1] World Health Organization (WHO). Pharmaceuticals in Drinking-  
Water, 2011, WHO/HSE/WSH.  
[2] Y. Ghafuri M.,YunesianR. ,Nabizadeh , A. Mesdaghinia , M. H.  
Dehghani , M. Alimohammadi, Environmental risk assessment of  
platinum cytotoxic drugs:a focus on toxicity characterization of  
hospital effluents, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol , 2017, DOI  
(13, 18).  
1
0.1007/s13762-017-1517-6.  
[
3] Y. Ghafuri, M. Yunesian, R. Nabizadeh, A. Mesdaghinia, M. H.  
Dehghani & M.Alimohammadi, Platinum cytotoxic drugs in the  
municipal wastewater and drinking water,a validation method and  
health risk assessment, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment:  
4
Conclusion  
The present study examined the utility of lc-ms/ms for the  
detection and possibility of method validation for platinum  
complex drugs (carboplatin and oxaliplatin). This is one the  
most concise SPE-LC-MS/MS studies reported so far in the  
literature. Platinum-based anticancer drugs play an important  
role in the chemotherapy of various tumor diseases. The  
significance of this study is helping decision-making regarding  
and the study of pharmaceutical emerging pollutants as well as  
the release and fate of these compounds in hospital wastewater  
and ground water.  
AnInternational  
Journal,  
(2017),  
DOI:  
1
0.1080/10807039.2017.1400372.  
[
[
4] Zhang, J.; Victor, W.C. Chang, Removal of cytostatic drugs from  
aquatic environment: A review, Science of the Total Environment,  
(2013), 19, 445446, 281298.  
5] Vyas, N.; Turner,A.; Sewell,G ,(2014), Platinum-based anticancer  
drugs in waste waters of a major UK hospital and predicted  
concentrations in recipient surface waters ,science of total  
environment, 493,324-329.  
[
[
[
[
6] Lenz, K.; Koellensperger, G., Fate of cancerostatic platinum  
compounds in biological Wastewater treatment of hospital  
effluents. Chemosphere, (2007), 69, 17651774.  
7] Turner, A., Particlewater interactions of platinum-based anticancer  
drugs in river water and estuarine water, Chemosphere, (2015),  
Acknowledgement  
The authors of the article thank of Qom University of  
Medical Sciences for supporting and production of data.  
1
19, 415422.  
8] Frederic O, Yves P, Pharmaceuticals in hospital wastewater: their  
ecotoxicity and contribution to the environmental hazard of the  
effluent. Chemosphere, (2014), 115:3139.  
9]- Noelia Nigeria, MirenLópez de Alda. Cytostatic drugs and  
metabolites in municipal and hospital wastewatersIn Spain:  
Filtration, occurrence, and environmental risk, 2014, Science of  
the Total Environment 497498.  
Ethical issue  
Authors are aware of, and comply with, best practice in  
publication ethics specifically with regard to authorship  
(avoidance of guest authorship), dual submission, manipulation  
of figures, competing interests and compliance with policies on  
research ethics. Authors adhere to publication requirements  
that submitted work is original and has not been published  
elsewhere in any language.  
[10] U.S. EPA, Exposure Assessment Tools and Models. EPI Suite  
v4.1., 2013,  
http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuitedl.htm〉  
accessed 1.11.13).  
(
Competing interests  
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that  
would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.  
[
11] Farida W. Rabii, Pedro A. Segura,PaulB.Fayad, Sébastien Sauvé ,  
Determination of six chemotherapeutic agents in municipal  
wastewaterusing online solid-phase extraction coupled to  
liquidchromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,Science of the  
Total Environment, ,(2014),487.788-800.  
1
174  
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques  
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1168-1175  
[
12] NoeliaNegreira, MirenpezdeAlda,DamiàBarc, , On-line Solid  
phase extractionliquid chromatographytandemmass  
spectrometry forthe determinationof17cytostatics and metabolites  
inwaste,surfaceandgroundwatersamples,  
Chromatography A, (2013), 8,65-74.  
[
[
[
[
13] Besse, J.P.; Latour, J.F.; Garric.J., Anticancer drugs in surface  
waters, what can we say about the occurrence and environmental  
significance of cytotoxic, cytostatic and endocrine therapy  
drugs,Environment International, (2012), 39 , 7386.  
14] Franquet-Griell, H.; Gomez-Canela, C, Predicting concentrations  
of cytostatic drugs in sewage effluents and surface waters of  
Catalonia (NE Spain), Environmental Research, (2015), 138, 161–  
1
72.  
15] Ferrando-Climent, L.; Rodriguez-Mozaz, S.; Barcel, D, Incidence  
of anticancer drugs in an aquatic urban system: From hospital  
effluents through urban wastewater to natural environment,  
Environmental Pollution, (2014), 193, 216-223.  
16] Daouk,S.; Chevre,N.; Vernaz,N.; Widmer,C.; Daali,Y.; Fleury-  
Souverain,S, Dynamics of active pharmaceutical ingredients loads  
in a Swiss university hospital wastewaters and prediction of the  
related environmental risk for the aquatic ecosystems, Science of  
the Total Environment, ,(2016), 547,244-253.  
[17] Virginia L. Cunningham, Stephen P. Binks, Michael J. Olson ,  
Human health risk assessment from the presence of human  
aquatic  
environment,Regulatory  
Toxicology and Pharmacology, (2009), 53, 39-45.  
[
18] Cidlinová A, Petruzelkova A, Mateju L, Wranova k. Health and  
environmental risks of cytostatics platinum group residues.  
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM.  
2
012 Sep 1;5:471.  
1
175