Journal
of Environmental Treatment Techniques, Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 58-61,
Download
PDF format
Removal and
Recovery of Pollutants from Wastewater by Using Continuous Liquid Membrane
System: A Review
Alif Azwan Abdul Wahab
Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Pulau Pinang) 13500 Permatang Pauh, Penang, Malaysia
Received: 01/12/2015 Accepted: 07/02/2016 Published: 30/06/2016
Abstract
Liquid membrane has received significant interest among the
researchers as it provides efficient technology in treating wastewater. However
the used of liquid membrane only available in batch and laboratory scale and
only a few can be found in the industries. The restriction were related to the
instability of liquid membrane such as small interfacial area for bulk liquid
membrane (BLM), membrane swelling for emulsion liquid membrane (ELM) and membrane
breakthrough for supported liquid membrane (SLM). Thus, this review will
discuss on the work of researchers to overcome those problems mostly in batch
and laboratory scale. A few applications on continuous liquid membrane in
industry application also will be addressed. Eventually, this review will
provide the prospective of liquid membrane as the future continuous treatment
method in wastewater treatment.
Key words: Continuous liquid
membrane, emulsion liquid membrane, supported liquid membrane, bulk liquid
membrane, and future prospect
1 Introduction[1]
The rapid industrialization and globalization have caused various environmental
issues such as water pollution which containing organic matters, toxic
elements, and heavy metals. These pollutants will pose a significant threat to
the environment and even to human health. Industries that are producing a large
amount of these pollutants-containing wastewater include electrical and electronics, metal plating and
finishing, textiles and dyes, pulp and papers, automotive, foundries, oil
refining and fertilizers (Bilal
et al., 2013; Minhas, Memon, Qureshi, Mujahid, & Bhanger, 2013). The large amount of wastewater
effluents containing toxic pollutants discharged into waterways pose a significant threat to groundwater
which may cause acute or chronic
poisoning to human health. However,
these toxic pollutants, if recovered properly from wastewater prior to
discharge, will not only prevent environmental pollution but will also help to
reduce the disposal cost of industries through recycling and reusing.
Conventional methods for treating toxic pollutants from wastewater
include adsorption, floatation, coagulation-flocculation, chemical
precipitation, membrane filtration, electrochemical processes and ion–exchange (Bilal
et al., 2013; Chang, Teng, & Ismail, 2011; Minhas et al., 2013). These methods have their own
limitations such as produce secondary sludge, high capital and operating cost,
inefficiency and difficulty in operating procedures (Wijers,
1996). Recently, considerable scientific attention
has been devoted to liquid membrane due to its unique features such as
simultaneous removal and recovery of solutes in a single unit operation, high
selectivity and fluxes, less energy consumption and non-equilibrium mass
transfer (Kocherginsky,
Yang, & Seelam, 2007; Teng & Muthuraman, 2013). Liquid membrane consists of three
main types which are Bulk Liquid Membrane (BLM), Emulsion Liquid Membrane
(ELM), and Supported Liquid Membrane (SLM).
Liquid membrane can be operated in batch and continuous mode (Kislik,
2009). Almost all types of liquid
membranes are still operating in batch system and laboratory scale because of
membrane instability encountered (Kislik,
2009). Continuous system usually carried
out in large scale production and designed for 24 h production throughout the
year (Sinnot,
2005). However, only a few of liquid
membrane operate in the continuous system in the industry. At present, emulsion
liquid membranes (ELM) has been commercially available in the industries to
remove and recover zinc from wastewater such as in the viscous fiber plant at
Lenzing, Austria with the capacity of 75m3/hr. Other industrial
level plants in removal of zinc are located at Glanzstoff, AG, Austria (700
m3/h capacity) and CFK Schwarza, Germany (200 m3/h capacity) ( a.
L. Ahmad, Kusumastuti, Derek, & Ooi, 2011; Kamiński &
Kwapiński, 2000; Kislik, 2009). However, according to
Kocherginsky et al. (Kocherginsky
et al., 2007), those three prominent types of
liquid membranes are mostly under study in laboratory and batch scale. This is
caused by some factors such as BLM which demonstrate small contact area and low
process kinetics (Kamiński
& Kwapiński, 2000; Kislik, 2009; Talebi, 2012). Second one, SLM faces the
long-term stability due to support body and membrane breakage (Kislik,
2009; Talebi, 2012), and third one, ELM which has the
big possibility of osmotic pressure and swelling ( a.
L. Ahmad et al., 2011; Sulaiman, Othman, & Amin, 2014). To be operated in the continuous
mode, the formulation which are consist of carrier, stripping agent, diluents,
phase modifier and surfactant for ELM system have an important effect on the
mass transfer efficiency and continuous and stable operation of the liquid
membrane (Othman,
Goto, & Mat, 2004). Besides that, in SLM system,
membrane support bodies also play an important role in maintaining a good
operation and system stability. Continuous liquid membrane (CLM) provide higher
recovery rate, more economic due to constant removal and recovery of selected
solutes, less residence time and give less total operating cost for large scale
and 24 h production when compare to the batch process (Kislik,
2009; Sinnot, 2005). Recent development of the CLM are
the design of rotational and vibrational membrane devices, use of
taylor-Couette column and the use of low-cost and good membrane support body (Kislik,
2009).
Most of the previous studies reported the possibility to recover
solutes efficiently with CLM system but they still highlighted the need for
further study to optimize the mass transfer for BLM, the condition and design
of system to balance enrichment ratio, and degree of emulsion swelling for ELM
and the proper type of support body to prevent membrane breakthrough for SLM.
Then, the objective of this paper is to provide an overview on the removal and
recovery of toxic pollutants from aqueous solution by using CLM system. A
comparison of different types of CLM systems is outlined and their applications
in removal and recovery of the pollutants are properly discussed. Major
challenges and future prospects towards the utilization of CLM systems in
removal and recovery of pollutants are also addressed.
2
Types and application of CLM system
Researchers have
conducted many studies to develop an effective and cost-saving CLM. The
attempts are being made by designing the reactors or columns that can give
higher recovery rate, combination of the good characteristics of liquid
membrane with one another and formulation of the good membrane phase and
support body. All these attempts were reported to be under study or in
laboratory scale. The first factor to be highlighted is the new design and
modification of equipment. Fournier-Salaun et al. (Fournier-Salaün & Salaün, 2009) have proposed the new design of
bulk liquid membrane to remove and recover chromium by using double extraction
modules with rotating disc. Each module has two compartments of extracting and
striping agent and continuously driven by peristaltic pumps. These compartments
are equipped with rotating discs to increase mass transfer rate. They confirm
the possibility of chromium recovery until 1 mole/L and made the conclusion
that the volume of membrane and rotating discs speed did not have influence on
percentage of chromium recovery. They also insisted that a rise of the flow
rate will decrease the percentage of extraction due to less contact time. Lee
et al. (Lee & Kim, 2011) also published a work about
recovery of acetic acid by continuous emulsion liquid membrane by using the
extraction column of Oldshue–Rushton type (multistage mixer column). The best
effect of their study in batch process is applied in this continuous system.
They obtained the percentage of acetic acid recovery as 93% and its enrichment
ratio 4.2 under a specific operating condition because the total
interfacial area for reaction capacity between feed phase and stripping phase
was larger. They suggested the further study to optimize operating condition in
this system and a better designed of extraction column for practical purpose.
Besides that, the another work have been done by Ahmad et al. (A. L. Ahmad, Kusumastuti, Shah Buddin, Derek, &
Ooi, 2014) to remove and
recover cadmium from wastewater by using ELM in counter rotating Taylor-Couette
column. This equipment will provide low and uniform fluid shear, help to
stabilize the emulsion droplets and prevent membrane breakage and swelling.
This equipment was found to recover more than 96% of cadmium by using high
angular frequency ratio which provides high mixing activity with low shear
stress.
The works to
combine the good characteristics of several types of liquid membrane also have
been conducted by the researchers. Recently, Belova et al. (Belova, Kostanyan, Zakhodyaeva, Kholkin, &
Logutenko, 2014) have invented
multistage three-phase extraction which consist of bulk and supported liquid
membrane techniques and can be known as bulk-supported liquid membrane. This
system was operated with three phases of mass transfer stages which
interconnected with contact chambers which were extraction chamber and
stripping chamber. The membrane phases were acted as mass transfer medium which
counter currently in contact with feed and stripping phases in those chamber in
closed circuit operation. The liquid membrane was held stationary circulating in
the system while feed and stripping phases were flowing through all the stages
as the mobile phase. This technique could help to improve the extraction and
stripping processes of the metals. They found that the increasing flow rate of
the membrane phases with respect to the flow of feed phase and the number of
contact chambers will significantly increase the degree of recovery of metals.
Meanwhile, Zheng et al. (Zheng, Chen, Wang, & Zhao, 2013) studied the effect of incorporating
the hollow fiber supported liquid membrane with emulsion liquid membrane. The
feed phase was pumped into the shell side of the hollow fiber membrane device
with properly adjusted pH while the emulsion phase (containing H2SO4
solution with organic phase after treated with ultrasonic vibration) was pumped
into tube side of the membrane device. The analyses outcome showed that, the
stability of the emulsion phase was poor without any surfactant and the
suitable phase ratio between organic and stripping phases to obtain the maximum
recovery of copper was 1.0. Meanwhile, the pH of the feed stream required to
achieve the maximum extraction of copper was determined as 3.0. With all
supported result data, they claimed that this hollow fibre supported emulsion
liquid membrane design gave an effective treatment technique in the recovery of
copper-containing wastewater.
Other factors that
contribute to development of continuous liquid membrane are the good
formulation on the membrane phase and appropriate support body. Agtmaal et al. (Agtmaal, 2013) studied the effect of the extraction efficiency of phenol in
continuous operation by using two type of supported liquid membrane which are
PP (propylene) and PVDF (polyvinylidenefluoride). They found that using the
membrane with less pore thickness will increase the extraction rate and
minimize the drain of membrane solvent. Besides that Bhowal et al. (Bhowal, Bhattacharyya, Inturu, & Datta, 2012) have studied the removal of chromium (VI) from wastewater by
using rotating spray column in continuous mode. They discovered that the volumetric
mass transfer coefficient is depending on the emulsion (oil-in-water emulsion)
flow rate, the rotational speed of column and flow rate of feed phase. From
those results, they concluded that the preparation of emulsion reagents was
important in order to increase the efficiency of the system as long as the smaller
size of the rotating contactor was installed.
3 Application of
continuous liquid membrane in wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment is
the major problem of the most proportion of the industrial sectors. Liquid
membrane is seen to be promising technology in wastewater treatment since it
has the similar established working principle with
solvent extraction but provide the advantage of cost reduction and recovery
process. There are a number of on-going research studies to employ liquid
membrane in continuous mode for wastewater treatment. Only a few of those works
have been reported and applied for continuous application either in the pilot
plants or industrial applications such as the recovery of zinc, phenol and
copper. For an instance, the removal and recovery of zinc have been introduced
by using ELM pertractions at the several plants in the district of Galvano
Techniek Veenendaal and Loko Gramsbergen, Netherlands by a research company (Kislik, 2009). The treatment plant
can be operate at the maximum capacity of 1500dm3/h. The operation
of this plant has lower down the volume of wastewater produced to six fold
reduction and saving the company operation cost totaling 30,000 Euros per year (Kislik, 2009). This ELM pertraction
technology offers a good potential for commercialization in the future. Another
industrial plant have been built in China which can treat about 0.5tons/h
wastewater that containing approximately 1000mg/L of phenol (Kamiński & Kwapiński, 2000). This system was described as permeation column which consists
of kerosene, extractants and surfactant as organic phase and sodium base as a
receiving phase. Wastewater has to be maintained in the range of pH 9 to
achieve the good separation (Kamiński & Kwapiński, 2000). The inventor has claimed that the recovery of phenol in the
receiving phase was good as 0.5mg/L (Kamiński & Kwapiński, 2000). Besides that, Yang et al. (Yang & Kocherginsky, 2006) have developed the pilot plant to recover the copper from the
industrial spent etchant (Cu2+ in aqueous solutions with ammonia).
They manage to build the efficient and economic system to regenerate the spent
etchant for reuses while simultaneously recover the copper product. The system
consists of hollow fiber supported liquid membrane with 130 m2
effective surface area. That pilot plant could offer the recovery of copper as
much as 60 kg/day while regenerated back the spent etchant up until 100 L/day.
However to the best author knowledge there is still lack of CLM application
neither in the public wastewater treatment nor industrial wastewater treatment.
4 Major
challenges and future prospects
Liquid membrane is the treatment method that has been
widely study and extensively investigate in various fields of industries such
as industrial wastewater, metal recovery, bio-separation, gas separation,
pharmaceutical and food and beverage production (Kislik, 2009; Pabby, Rizvi, & Requena, 2008). Since the treatment of industrial
wastewaters required the good promising technique, liquid membrane can be
regarded as potentially powerful solution for removal and recovery of
pollutants in this context. However, most of the researchers faced the
difficulties on the application and commercialization of liquid membrane due to
instability of membrane occurs. Thus, most of the recent research studies have
been focusing on the minimizing those problems. Their research studies mainly
involve in maximizing the contact area to increase the mass flux, minimizing
the membrane leakage or rupture, and improving the pore support structure to
avoid the loss of carrier and solvent which are associated to BLM, ELM and SLM
respectively. Besides that the successful application of liquid membrane in
continuous mode is also related to good membrane formulation and proper
operating conditions. These can be achieved from suitably designed
computer–aided flow system to fully control the whole extraction and recovery
processes (Ma, Shen, Luo, & Zhu, 2004). With full commitment from
researchers to further the research studies, it is undeniable that CLM will be
extensively used in future either in public domain or industrial sectors.
5 Conclusions
The development of science and technology
around the world in positive way undeniable, but at the same time it will
produce the side effect to the environment. The discharge of wastewater
containing hazardous pollutants without proper treatment will result the future
generations into environmental red zone. Liquid membrane is the prospective
treatment method in the removal and recovery of the pollutants from wastewater.
The use of liquid membrane in continuous mode is more preferred as it provide higher and
constant recovery rate, more selectivity, less residence time and less
operating cost compared to the batch mode. Nevertheless, there are a number of
obstacles that encountered by researchers to commercialize liquid membrane as
it demonstrate the instability problems. Thus, many studies have been conducted
to find the solutions regarding to those problems such as combination of the
good characteristics of liquid membrane with one another, formulation of the
good membrane phase and support body and modification on the reactors or
columns. These studies were mostly available in batch or laboratory scale. Only
a few industrial applications of CLM can be found the industrial scale such as the recovery of zinc,
phenol and copper. As the recent studies on CLM were showing the positive and
concrete results, it has a bright future to be use in the wastewater treatment.
Aknowledgment
The author is gratefully thanks to
Universiti Teknologi MARA under Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia for their continuous support.
References
1 Agtmaal, S. van. (2013). The Effect of Supported
Liquid Membrane and Liquid Membrane Phase on the Extraction Efficiency of Coal
Gasification Wastewater. Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology, 2(3),
191–197. Retrieved from http://lifescienceglobal.com/pms/index.php/jmst/article/view/1221
2 Ahmad, a. L., Kusumastuti, a., Derek, C. J. C., & Ooi, B. S. (2011).
Emulsion liquid membrane for heavy metal removal: An overview on emulsion
stabilization and destabilization. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171(3),
870–882. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.102
3 Ahmad, A. L.,
Kusumastuti, A., Shah Buddin, M. M. H., Derek, C. J. C., & Ooi, B. S.
(2014). Emulsion liquid membrane based on a new flow pattern in a counter
rotating Taylor-Couette column for cadmium extraction. Separation and
Purification Technology, 127, 46–52.
doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.029
4 Belova, V. V.,
Kostanyan, a. E., Zakhodyaeva, Y. A.,
Kholkin, a. I., & Logutenko, O. a.
(2014). On the application of bulk-supported liquid membrane techniques in
hydrometallurgy. Hydrometallurgy, 150, 144–152.
doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.10.011
5 Bhowal, a., Bhattacharyya, G., Inturu, B., &
Datta, S. (2012). Continuous removal of hexavalent chromium by emulsion liquid
membrane in a modified spray column. Separation and Purification Technology,
99, 69–76. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.08.026
6 Bilal, M., Shah,
J. A., Ashfaq, T., Gardazi, S. M. H., Tahir, A. A., Pervez, A., … Mahmood, Q.
(2013). Waste biomass adsorbents for copper removal from industrial
wastewater--a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 263 Pt 2,
322–33. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.071
7 Chang, S., Teng,
T., & Ismail, N. (2011). Soybean Oil-Based Bulk Liquid Membrane for Simultaneous
Extraction and Stripping of Cu (II) from Aqueous Solutions. Ijesd.org, 2(5),
2–6. Retrieved from http://www.ijesd.org/papers/156-L10012.pdf
8 Fournier-Salaün,
M.-C., & Salaün, P. (2009). Influence of operating parameters on chromic
ions removal from aqueous solution by liquid membranes. Desalination, 249(2),
549–553. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2008.07.032
9 Kamiński,
W., & Kwapiński, W. (2000). Applicability of liquid membranes in
environmental protection. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 9(1),
37–43. Retrieved from http://pjoes.com/pdf/9.1/37-43.pdf
10 Kislik, V. (2009). Liquid membranes: principles and
applications in chemical separations and wastewater treatment (1st ed.).
Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53218-3.00010-6
11 Kocherginsky, N.
M., Yang, Q., & Seelam, L. (2007). Recent advances in supported liquid
membrane technology. Separation and Purification Technology, 53(2),
171–177. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2006.06.022
12 Lee, S. C., & Kim, H. C. (2011). Batch and continuous
separation of acetic acid from succinic acid in a feed solution with high
concentrations of carboxylic acids by emulsion liquid membranes. Journal of
Membrane Science, 367(1-2), 190–196.
doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.057
13 Ma, M., Shen, A., Luo, X., & Zhu, X. (2004). Solvent
Extraction and Liquid‐Membrane
Transport for Separation and Purification of Rutaecarpine from E. rutaecarpa
var. officinalis. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 22(3),
511–525. doi:10.1081/SEI-120030639
14 Minhas, F. T., Memon,
S., Qureshi, I., Mujahid, M., & Bhanger, M. I. (2013). Facilitated kinetic
transport of Cu(II) through a supported liquid membrane with
calix[4]arene as a carrrier. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 16(8),
742–751. doi:10.1016/j.crci.2013.02.004
15 Othman, N., Goto,
M., & Mat, H. (2004). Liquid membrane Technology for precious metals
recovery from industrial waste. In Regional Symposium on Membrane Science
and Technology 2004 Malaysia. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/1064/
16 Pabby, A., Rizvi,
S., & Requena, A. (2008). Handbook of membrane separations: chemical,
pharmaceutical, food, and biotechnological applications. CRC Press.
Retrieved from
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3QaUuTg6L1cC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Handbook+of+Membrane+Separations+Chemical,+Pharmaceutical,+Food,+and+Biotechnological+Applications&ots=1hMMcrZzt-&sig=zj-YGIAnW6_9L1J_00bJsZUnkic
17 Sinnot, R. K.
(2005). Chemical Engineering Design, Volume 6 (4th ed.). Coulson &
Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Series.
18 Sulaiman, R. N. R.,
Othman, N., & Amin, N. A. S. (2014). Emulsion liquid membrane stability in
the extraction of ionized nanosilver from wash water. Journal of Industrial
and Engineering Chemistry, 20(5), 3243–3250.
doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.005
19 Talebi, A. (2012).
Green Liquid Membrane: Development and Challenges. Journal of Membrane
Science & Technology, 02(03), 2–3.
doi:10.4172/2155-9589.1000e106
20 Teng, T., & Muthuraman, G. (2013). Emulsion Liquid
Membrane: Removal and Recovery of Organic and Inorganic Ions. Journal
Membrane Science & Technology, 3(2), 3–4.
doi:10.4172/2155-9589.1000e117
21 Wijers, C. (1996).
Supported Liquid Membranes for Removal of Heavy Metals Permeability,
Selectivity and Stability (1st ed.). Ponsen & Looijen B.V.
22 Yang, Q., &
Kocherginsky, N. M. (2006). Copper recovery and spent ammoniacal etchant
regeneration based on hollow fiber supported liquid membrane technology: From
bench-scale to pilot-scale tests. Journal of Membrane Science, 286,
301–309. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.012
23 Zheng, H., Chen,
J., Wang, B., & Zhao, S. (2013). Recovery of Copper Ions from Wastewater by
Hollow Fiber Supported Emulsion Liquid Membrane. Chinese Journal of Chemical
Engineering, 21(8), 827–834. doi:10.1016/S1004-9541(13)60547-9